5 graphs on income inequality and the Great Recession
The report,” Income inequality and the Great Recession released last week by the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee begins:
Income inequality has worsened in the U.S.Over the past three decades, income inequality has grown dramatically. After remaining relatively constant for much of the post‐war era, the share of total income accrued by the wealthiest 10 percent of households jumped from 34.6 percent in 1980 to 48.2 percent in 2008. Much of the spike was driven by the share of total income accrued by the richest 1 percent of households. Between 1980 and 2008, their share rose from 10.0 percent to 21.0 percent, making the United States as one of the most unequal countries in the world.2 Moving even further up the income distribution, the share of income accruing to the wealthiest 0.1 percent of households – those with incomes of at least $1.7 million in 2008 – has grown sharply as well. In short, the evolution of income inequality in the United States is largely driven by the trends at the very top of the income distribution, as very wealthy households have continued to accrue an ever‐greater share of the nation’s total income.
The report includes the following graphs.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Real World Economics Review
Real World Economics Review
WEA – May 2011 – 11,500+ members
5600 people follow this blog on Twitter
Recent Comments
- paul davidson on Further suggestions for Krugman’s IS-LM reading list
- Paul Grignon on Graphs of the day – the investment slump in the Eurozone (3 graphs)
- Herb Wiseman on Sweden’s 30 years of income redistribution
- Mike Meeropol on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- Gunnar Tómasson on Further suggestions for Krugman’s IS-LM reading list
- ezra abrams on Sweden’s 30 years of income redistribution
- Robert Locke on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- lyonwiss on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- davetaylor1 on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- lyonwiss on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- paul davidson on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- lyonwiss on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- davetaylor1 on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- paul davidson on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- davetaylor1 on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
Top Posts and Pages- last 48 hours
- Sweden's 30 years of income redistribution
- Graphs of the day - the investment slump in the Eurozone (3 graphs)
- Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- Further suggestions for Krugman’s IS-LM reading list
- The state of economics: Krugman is wrong
- Emerging vs. developed countries' GDP growth rates 1986 to 2015
- IS-LM is bad economics no matter what Krugman says
- Creating an Economics for the 21st Century
- FROOPP - or understanding peoples perceptions of inflation (1 graph)
- 20 graphs showing inequality in the USA
Revere Award in Economics
Dynamite Prize for Economics
Blog Authors
- anmayhew
- Lewis L. Smith
- bruceedmonds
- Kevin P. Gallagher
- deanbaker1
- Steve Keen
- Deniz Kellecioglu
- David F. Ruccio
- donaldgillies
- Peter Dorman
- Editor
- frankackerman
- frankrotering
- Edward Fullbrook
- iettogg
- jamieamorgan
- Jim Stanford
- julieanelson
- Mark Weisbrot
- merijnknibbe
- paul davidson
- Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra
- Peter Earl
- pesod
- peterradford
- paul ormerod
- Peter Earl
- staveren
Most downloaded RWER papers
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
RWER Contributors
Editor: Edward Fullbrook. Associate Editor: Jamie Morgan. PAST CONTRIBUTORS: James Galbraith, Frank Ackerman, André Orléan, Hugh Stretton, Jacques Sapir, Edward Fullbrook, Gilles Raveaud, Deirdre McCloskey, Tony Lawson, Geoff Harcourt, Joseph Halevi, Sheila C. Dow, Kurt Jacobsen, The Cambridge 27, Paul Ormerod, Steve Keen, Grazia Ietto-Gillies, Emmanuelle Benicourt, Le Movement Autisme-Economie, Geoffrey Hodgson, Ben Fine, Michael A. Bernstein, Julie A. Nelson, Jeff Gates, Anne Mayhew, Bruce Edmonds, Jason Potts, John Nightingale, Alan Shipman, Peter E. Earl, Marc Lavoie, Jean Gadrey, Peter Söderbaum, Bernard Guerrien, Susan Feiner, Warren J. Samuels, Katalin Martinás, George M. Frankfurter, Elton G. McGoun, Yanis Varoufakis, Alex Millmow, Bruce J. Caldwell, Poul Thøis Madsen, Helge Peukert, Dietmar Lindenberger, Reiner Kümmel, Jane King, Peter Dorman, K.M.P. Williams, Frank Rotering, Ha-Joon Chang, Claude Mouchot, Robert E. Lane, James G. Devine, Richard Wolff, Jamie Morgan, Robert Heilbroner, William Milberg, Stephen T. Ziliak, Steve Fleetwood, Tony Aspromourgos, Yves Gingras, Ingrid Robeyns, Robert Scott Gassler, Grischa Periono, Esther-Mirjam Sent, Ana Maria Bianchi, Steve Cohn, Peter Wynarczyk, Daniel Gay, Asatar Bair, Nathaniel Chamberland, James Bondio, Jared Ferrie, Goutam U. Jois, Charles K. Wilber, Robert Costanza, Saski Sivramkrishna, Jorge Buzaglo, Jim Stanford, Matthew McCartney, Herman E. Daly, Kyle Siler, Kepa M. Ormazabal, Antonio Garrido, Robert Locke, J. E. King, Paul Davidson, Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra, Kevin Quinn, Trond Andresen, Shaun Hargreaves Heap, Lewis L. Smith, Gautam Mukerjee, Ian Fletcher, Rajni Bakshi, M. Ben-Yami, Deborah Campbell, Irene van Staveren, Neva Goodwin, Thomas Weisskopf, Mehrdad Vahabi, Erik S. Reinert, Jeroen Van Bouwel, Bruce R. McFarling, Pia Malaney, Andrew Spielman, Jeffery Sachs, Julian Edney, Frederic S. Lee, Paul Downward, Andrew Mearman, Dean Baker, Tom Green, David Ellerman, Wolfgang Drechsler, Clay Shirky, Bjørn-Ivar Davidsen, Robert F. Garnett, Jr., François Eymard-Duvernay, Olivier Favereau, Robert Salais, Laurent Thévenot, Mohamed Aslam Haneef, Kurt Rothschild, Jomo K. S., Gustavo Marqués, David F. Ruccio, John Barry, William Kaye-Blake; Michael Ash, Donald Gillies, Kevin P.Gallagher, Lyuba Zarsky, Michel Bauwens, Bruce Cumings, Concetta Balestra, Frank Fagan, Christian Arnsperger, Stanley Alcorn, Ben Solarz, Sanford Jacoby, Kari Polanyi, P. Sainath, Margaret Legum, Juan Carlos Moreno-Brid, Igor Pauno, Ron Morrison, John Schmitt, Ben Zipperer, John B. Davis, Alan Freeman, Andrew Kliman, Philip Ball, Alan Goodacre, Robert McMaster, David A. Bainbridge, Richard Parker, Tim Costello, Brendan Smith, Jeremy Brecher, Peter T. Manicas, Arjo Klamer, Donald MacKenzie, Max Wright, Joseph E. Stiglitz. George Irvin, Frédéric Lordon, James Angresano, Robert Pollin, Heidi Garrett-Peltier, Dani Rodrik, Marcellus Andrews, Riccardo Baldissone, Ted Trainer, Kenneth J. Arrow, Brian Snowdon, Helen Johns, Fanny Coulomb, J. Paul Dunne, Jayati Ghosh, L. A Duhs, Paul Shaffer, Donald W Braben, Roland Fox, Marco Gillies, Joshua C. Hall, Robert A. Lawson, Will Luther, JP Bouchaud, Claude Hillinger, George Soros, David George, Alan Wolfe, Thomas I. Palley, Sean Mallin, Clive Dilnot, Dan Turton, Korkut Ertürk, Gökcer Özgür, Geoff Tily, Jonathan M. Harris, Thomas I. Palley, Jan Kregel, Peter Gowan, David Colander, Hans Foellmer, Armin Haas, Alan Kirman, Katarina Juselius, Brigitte Sloth, Thomas Lux, Luigi Sapaventa, Gunnar Tómasson, Anatole Kaletsky, Robert R Locke, Bill Lucarelli, L. Randall Wray, Mark Weisbrot, Walden Bello, Marvin Brown, Deniz Kellecioglu, Esteban Pérez Caldentey, Matías Vernengo, Thodoris Koutsobinas, David A. Westbrook, Peter Radford, Paul A. David, Richard Smith, Russell Standish, Yeva Nersisyan, Elizabeth Stanton, Jonathan Kirshner, Thomas Wells, Bruce Elmslie, Steve Marglin, Adam Kessler, John Duffield, Mary Mellor, Merijn Knibbe, Michael Hudson, Lars Pålsson Syll, Korkut Erturk, Jane D’Arista, Richard Smith, Ali Kadri, Egmont Kakarot-Handtke, Ozgur Gun, George DeMartino, Robert H. Wade, Silla Sigurgeirsdottir, Victor A. Beker, Pavlina R. Tcherneva, Ali Kadri, Egmont Kakarot-Handtke, Ozgur Gun, George DeMartino, Robert H. Wade, Silla Sigurgeirsdottir, Victor A. Beker, Pavlina R. Tcherneva
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
Family Links
- David Ruccio’s Blog
- Dean Baker Op-Eds and Columns
- Global Development and Environmental Institute
- Mark Weisbrot Op-Eds and Columns
- No Apparent Motive
- Real Climate Economics
- real-world economics review
- Richard Wolff
- Steve Keen’s Debtwatch
- The Progressive Economics Forum
- The Radford Free Press
- Triple Crisis
- Walking Against Australia's Property Mania
Contact
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009





It seems that the implication of the development in income distribution before and between the two crisis implies that for a more smooth economic activities there is a need for improvement in income distribution. I hope somebody would be able to verify this through an econometric analysis.
So much for free markets, deregulation and tax cuts for the rich Doh! Havent we been here before. In another time and place its called laissez faire economics (the economic policies favoured by the rich and powerful and the expense of everyone else). The only difference now is that they pay for their own “experts”, pay for their own “schools” and pay for their own “lobby groups” to convince everyone else its all a good idea….until it finally becomes obvious to those who make policy decisions (if there are any unpaid unvested interests left in the shells of government) that it was very bad policy. Perhaps when the ordinary man can no longer buy the goods the wealthy man has been subsidised (with our taxes) to produce…will the wealthy men wake up. That day is rapidly approaching.
Alice: I feel an affinity to your thinking… the way you seem to be thinking. I’m new to this site and how to negotiate it.. just that I caught your drift…
The data is good but when you read the Report you will find it is marred by ridiculous partisanship — making it seem like the Clinton years were “great” for ordinary middle class Americans. Yes, Clinton did raise marginal tax rates on the very rich — but not to as high as they were under Reagan between 1981 and 1987.
However, Clinton also re-created the Capital Gains preference for very rich taxpayers — This produced a temporary windfall of income for the Federal Government during the stock bubble but it also contributed to a continued growth in inequality.
Also, it was CLINTON who acquiesced in financial deregulation which paved the way for the HOUSING BUBBLE to replace the TECH bubble.
All of the Report’s efforts to make Clinton the good guy and Bush the bad guy attempts to obscure the fact that from the inception of neo-liberalism (which really begins to triumph with Carter’s last two years) as ruling macro-policy in the US, there has been a steady trend upward in inquality and de-regulation — which has in some ways (see Saez’ data) replicated the 1920s …
Here we are in our version of the 1930s — and we’ve got no FDR in the White House and a gathering storm of proto-fascists outside the gates ready to create an American version of Mussolini’s Italy or worse — And unlike the 1930s, there’s no Communist and/or Socialist presence to force the establishment in a better direction.
Very scary.
[PS: I recommend Bob Pollin's book CONTOURS OF DESCENT to show how Clinton's Administration helped continue the trends begun under Carter and Reagan -- my own book's title tells my view: SURRENDER, HOW THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION COMPLETED THE REAGAN REVOLUTION.]
Mike – well said. The trouble with the long sustained push towards more laissez faire economic policies is that it has been encouraged by political leadership of both persuasions over a long extended period of time. This is evident in the US and Australia and Im sure it would be seen in many countries. It has proved an insidiously tenacious belief set and still persists. Its been written into all the procedure manuals and no doubt “the guide to the would be political aspirant”….and it make take a awhile to shake yet.
Produce something Real; Sell something tangible – This is the Solution for USA. After that think of Saving.
Right on.
There are still many market fundamentalists around who are claiming that government intervention in the housing market precipitated the latest crisis.
I have seen the documentation against this version in links from various blogs and articles, but do you know of any peer-reviewed academic literature which has presented or refuted this lassez-faire tale?
Thank you for this information. I just posted my thoughts on this unfair inequality of wealth and income distribution. I agree that it is bad economic policy, but I would like for our political leaders to name it and frame it as what it is: immoral.
The Irish Potato famine is an interesting historical example of the triumph of stupidity over experience so far as free trade is concerned. As the death rate from starvation increased by thousands and many more thousands began the long trek to the USA, so movements were made to try and stop the export of Irish food from Ireland (as had been done in the previous century) to save lives. The British equivalent of the GOP, the Tories, insisted that restricting free trade would bring about an end to civilization and that free trade would take care of the problem if left to its own devices. Thus a million Irish are estimated to have died, even as boats laden to the gunwhales with Irish beef and grain left for London to fill the pockets of the Anglo-Irish elite, surely some of the worst specimens of humanity that ever crawled out from under a stone. Laissez-faire capitalism isn’t a theory, or really even an ideology, it’s a psychological illness or the most obvious symptom of a sociopathic personality.