Home > The Economics Profession > Thought for the day: on scarcity (of clothes)

Thought for the day: on scarcity (of clothes)

from  Merijn Knibbe

Nowadays we’ve got these DSGE models. DSGE: that’s Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium. Part of the rhetorics of these intensely neo classical articles is a ritual phrase that they have ‘sound’ or ‘non trivial’ micro foundations. As ‘micro’ in economics means: the individual man of woman, the individual household or the individual company one might expect models which, though neo-classical and therefore not allowing for lasting connections between atomistic individuals, still start at the individual level – to work their way up to the macro level. Wrong.  They just superimpose, with only this ritual phrase as justification, the neo-classical choice model upon the sector households, firms and the like. DSGE models do not have sound micro foundations. But they also do not have unsound micro foundations. They have no micro foundations at all. 

Real micro foundations of aggregate variables and developments are possible. They can even be exciting (Braun, 1990 (1960)). Economic Historians have for quite some time used ‘agent based statistics’, i.e. different sets of aggregate data based upon the exactly same set of individual persons or households  (Levine, 1987). Economic statisticians are following suit, at the moment. That’s sound, that’s non-trivial. That’s scientific.

A really good micro/meso level history book:  Braun, R., ‘Industrialisation and everyday life’ (Cambridge, 1990, original Swiss edition in 1960).

Levine, D., Reproducing families. The political economy of english population history, Themes in the Social Sciences (Cambridge 1987).

About these ads
  1. November 1, 2010 at 1:30 am | #1

    In the old days the Catholic Clergy used to bamboozle their flocks with Latin verbiage. I think contemporary economists have picked up on that practice.

  2. antonio garrido
    November 1, 2010 at 9:50 am | #2

    Not easy to see the advantages of having micro-fundations. Neo-clasicals claims they got it, but what really got is many households and many firms which have, all of them, the same behaviour…!!!.
    The important is to have a model able to explain past and predict future. This done, nobody will ask for micofundations of macro relatonships (or for macro fundations of micro ones for that matter).

  3. antonio garrido
    November 1, 2010 at 10:01 am | #3

    By the way, where the clothes came in this history?.
    Maybe “the emperor have no clothes?”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,305 other followers