Republican tax plans to date in one convenient graphic
from David Ruccio
Kevin Drum has collected charts showing all the Republican tax plans to date in one convenient graphic.
It’s really pretty spectacular seeing them all together like this. It’s not just the amount of pandering to the super-rich that’s so breathtaking, it’s the lockstep unanimity. At all costs, every single Republican candidate knows that he has to promise the ultra-wealthy a huge tax break as the price of staying in the race. This, ladies and gentlemen, is the modern Republican Party in a nutshell.
The Tax Policy Center recently released its formal analysis of Mitt Romney’s tax plan (which is discussed by Linda Beale) and provided a preliminary analysis of the tax agenda of flavor-of-the-day Rick Santorum.
We all know what the Republican tax policy looks like. The real question is, what’s their agenda for the pretax U.S. economy, where the real inequalities in the distribution of income and wealth are generated?
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Real World Economics Review
Real World Economics Review
WEA – May 2011 – 11,500+ members
5600 people follow this blog on Twitter
Recent Comments
- paul davidson on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- davetaylor1 on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- Fred Zaman on Creating an Economics for the 21st Century
- lyonwiss on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- Michael Lucas Monterey on The state of economics: Krugman is wrong
- Michael Lucas Monterey on The state of economics: Krugman is wrong
- paul davidson on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- davetaylor1 on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- davetaylor1 on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- Robert Locke on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- paul davidson on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- Garrett Connelly on The state of economics: Krugman is wrong
- lyonwiss on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- scottonthespot on The state of economics: Krugman is wrong
- Robert Locke on The state of economics: Krugman is wrong
Top Posts and Pages- last 48 hours
- The state of economics: Krugman is wrong
- Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- FROOPP - or understanding peoples perceptions of inflation (1 graph)
- Connecting the dots—or not (Stiglitz or Krugman)
- "The upper class has a higher propensity for unethical behavior."
- Emerging vs. developed countries' GDP growth rates 1986 to 2015
- IS-LM is bad economics no matter what Krugman says
- Creating an Economics for the 21st Century
- issue no. 63 of real-world economics review
- Graphs of the day - the investment slump in the Eurozone (3 graphs)
Revere Award in Economics
Dynamite Prize for Economics
Blog Authors
- anmayhew
- Lewis L. Smith
- bruceedmonds
- Kevin P. Gallagher
- deanbaker1
- Steve Keen
- Deniz Kellecioglu
- David F. Ruccio
- donaldgillies
- Peter Dorman
- Editor
- frankackerman
- frankrotering
- Edward Fullbrook
- iettogg
- jamieamorgan
- Jim Stanford
- julieanelson
- Mark Weisbrot
- merijnknibbe
- paul davidson
- Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra
- Peter Earl
- pesod
- peterradford
- paul ormerod
- Peter Earl
- staveren
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
RWER Contributors
Editor: Edward Fullbrook. Associate Editor: Jamie Morgan. PAST CONTRIBUTORS: James Galbraith, Frank Ackerman, André Orléan, Hugh Stretton, Jacques Sapir, Edward Fullbrook, Gilles Raveaud, Deirdre McCloskey, Tony Lawson, Geoff Harcourt, Joseph Halevi, Sheila C. Dow, Kurt Jacobsen, The Cambridge 27, Paul Ormerod, Steve Keen, Grazia Ietto-Gillies, Emmanuelle Benicourt, Le Movement Autisme-Economie, Geoffrey Hodgson, Ben Fine, Michael A. Bernstein, Julie A. Nelson, Jeff Gates, Anne Mayhew, Bruce Edmonds, Jason Potts, John Nightingale, Alan Shipman, Peter E. Earl, Marc Lavoie, Jean Gadrey, Peter Söderbaum, Bernard Guerrien, Susan Feiner, Warren J. Samuels, Katalin Martinás, George M. Frankfurter, Elton G. McGoun, Yanis Varoufakis, Alex Millmow, Bruce J. Caldwell, Poul Thøis Madsen, Helge Peukert, Dietmar Lindenberger, Reiner Kümmel, Jane King, Peter Dorman, K.M.P. Williams, Frank Rotering, Ha-Joon Chang, Claude Mouchot, Robert E. Lane, James G. Devine, Richard Wolff, Jamie Morgan, Robert Heilbroner, William Milberg, Stephen T. Ziliak, Steve Fleetwood, Tony Aspromourgos, Yves Gingras, Ingrid Robeyns, Robert Scott Gassler, Grischa Periono, Esther-Mirjam Sent, Ana Maria Bianchi, Steve Cohn, Peter Wynarczyk, Daniel Gay, Asatar Bair, Nathaniel Chamberland, James Bondio, Jared Ferrie, Goutam U. Jois, Charles K. Wilber, Robert Costanza, Saski Sivramkrishna, Jorge Buzaglo, Jim Stanford, Matthew McCartney, Herman E. Daly, Kyle Siler, Kepa M. Ormazabal, Antonio Garrido, Robert Locke, J. E. King, Paul Davidson, Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra, Kevin Quinn, Trond Andresen, Shaun Hargreaves Heap, Lewis L. Smith, Gautam Mukerjee, Ian Fletcher, Rajni Bakshi, M. Ben-Yami, Deborah Campbell, Irene van Staveren, Neva Goodwin, Thomas Weisskopf, Mehrdad Vahabi, Erik S. Reinert, Jeroen Van Bouwel, Bruce R. McFarling, Pia Malaney, Andrew Spielman, Jeffery Sachs, Julian Edney, Frederic S. Lee, Paul Downward, Andrew Mearman, Dean Baker, Tom Green, David Ellerman, Wolfgang Drechsler, Clay Shirky, Bjørn-Ivar Davidsen, Robert F. Garnett, Jr., François Eymard-Duvernay, Olivier Favereau, Robert Salais, Laurent Thévenot, Mohamed Aslam Haneef, Kurt Rothschild, Jomo K. S., Gustavo Marqués, David F. Ruccio, John Barry, William Kaye-Blake; Michael Ash, Donald Gillies, Kevin P.Gallagher, Lyuba Zarsky, Michel Bauwens, Bruce Cumings, Concetta Balestra, Frank Fagan, Christian Arnsperger, Stanley Alcorn, Ben Solarz, Sanford Jacoby, Kari Polanyi, P. Sainath, Margaret Legum, Juan Carlos Moreno-Brid, Igor Pauno, Ron Morrison, John Schmitt, Ben Zipperer, John B. Davis, Alan Freeman, Andrew Kliman, Philip Ball, Alan Goodacre, Robert McMaster, David A. Bainbridge, Richard Parker, Tim Costello, Brendan Smith, Jeremy Brecher, Peter T. Manicas, Arjo Klamer, Donald MacKenzie, Max Wright, Joseph E. Stiglitz. George Irvin, Frédéric Lordon, James Angresano, Robert Pollin, Heidi Garrett-Peltier, Dani Rodrik, Marcellus Andrews, Riccardo Baldissone, Ted Trainer, Kenneth J. Arrow, Brian Snowdon, Helen Johns, Fanny Coulomb, J. Paul Dunne, Jayati Ghosh, L. A Duhs, Paul Shaffer, Donald W Braben, Roland Fox, Marco Gillies, Joshua C. Hall, Robert A. Lawson, Will Luther, JP Bouchaud, Claude Hillinger, George Soros, David George, Alan Wolfe, Thomas I. Palley, Sean Mallin, Clive Dilnot, Dan Turton, Korkut Ertürk, Gökcer Özgür, Geoff Tily, Jonathan M. Harris, Thomas I. Palley, Jan Kregel, Peter Gowan, David Colander, Hans Foellmer, Armin Haas, Alan Kirman, Katarina Juselius, Brigitte Sloth, Thomas Lux, Luigi Sapaventa, Gunnar Tómasson, Anatole Kaletsky, Robert R Locke, Bill Lucarelli, L. Randall Wray, Mark Weisbrot, Walden Bello, Marvin Brown, Deniz Kellecioglu, Esteban Pérez Caldentey, Matías Vernengo, Thodoris Koutsobinas, David A. Westbrook, Peter Radford, Paul A. David, Richard Smith, Russell Standish, Yeva Nersisyan, Elizabeth Stanton, Jonathan Kirshner, Thomas Wells, Bruce Elmslie, Steve Marglin, Adam Kessler, John Duffield, Mary Mellor, Merijn Knibbe, Michael Hudson, Lars Pålsson Syll, Korkut Erturk, Jane D’Arista, Richard Smith, Ali Kadri, Egmont Kakarot-Handtke, Ozgur Gun, George DeMartino, Robert H. Wade, Silla Sigurgeirsdottir, Victor A. Beker, Pavlina R. Tcherneva, Ali Kadri, Egmont Kakarot-Handtke, Ozgur Gun, George DeMartino, Robert H. Wade, Silla Sigurgeirsdottir, Victor A. Beker, Pavlina R. Tcherneva
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
Family Links
- David Ruccio’s Blog
- Dean Baker Op-Eds and Columns
- Global Development and Environmental Institute
- Mark Weisbrot Op-Eds and Columns
- No Apparent Motive
- Real Climate Economics
- real-world economics review
- Richard Wolff
- Steve Keen’s Debtwatch
- The Progressive Economics Forum
- The Radford Free Press
- Triple Crisis
- Walking Against Australia's Property Mania
Contact
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009

What about Ron Paul’s tax policy?
I would not mind these tax advantages for the rich. IF AND ONLY IF they would not hide their wealth in offshore accounts. So, I think it is a right policy to reduce the % tax but put the IRS to full access to offshore accounts. Or abolish the offshores – at least make them transparent in fiscal reporting.
It is obvious the reason to start decreasing or level the % for the rich. It is not fair to be forced to pay more than you will practically use in terms of public services: military, police, public health. At some point, your income will raise but you will not need proportionally more public emergency health or policing to justify paying the same or higher % of your income than those with smaller income.
You can’t hide land in a tax haven. Why not tax that?
It would be far simpler to go back to the tax rates of the 1950s than attempt to chase every offshore tax haven. You might actually get better entrepreneurs that can survive higher tax rates than those who just “pass by”..and pay little tax (really do we need those people?)
A sensible view sees an obvious need to redistribute away from the wealthy now (given the level of inequality).
A cynical view also sees a need to redistribute away from the wealthy now – maybe as pay back to all those they may have fleeced or treated badly on the way eg Goldman Sachs..
Either way raising taxes on the rwealthy to 1950s levels might just shock a few people and you may just get rid of a few leeches (hopefully from Wall Street).
The purpose of tax is not just to implement user pays of government services (yet another neoliberal silly idea).
Alice, Your heart is in the right place, but your proposal is really no more practicable than the others. The rulers of the plutonomy, the Big Winners of Plutonomy, the End Game scenario of the unFree world game are not going to let such a radical change occur in their lifetimes. Why do you think they rigged the game to let themselves win? Then we also have all the Dupes to consider, about 70% percent of the population is not only clueless, they are obsessed with believing that they are not slaves, socioeconomic droids. Over 20% are Glorps, willing co-conspirators who know enough to know better, but they have no hope of changing the game. So, they try to enjoy their crumbs & perqs & not think too much nor too deeply. Many of them are either Fox News junkies or Faux Progressives with mutual funds & multiple pensions to consider.
Furthermore, the population is growing at about the same rate that automation is eliminating jobs, which ensures exponential growth of unemployment. Short of a miracle or global doom, China’s market economy will equal and surpass the USA’s in 2016 if not sooner. The strength of the relatively healthy economies of the Southern Hemisphere + Southeast Asia + India + Germany will also surpass the USA’s economic clout. China has already matched or exceeded the USA’s talent & interest in innovation and they have all the positive & negative incentives necessary to keep innovating & developing far beyond the crippled, retarded USA. So, the inescapable conclusion is that the Big Winners of Plutonomy no longer need or care about bleeding heart Faux Liberals, sleepwalkers, the US Constitution, etc.
The dumbing down of America worked — as planned since before the Constitution was signed and as implemented from the inception of the Fed.
Actually, the process probably started before the rise of Babylon, but was systematically perfected from the beginning of the “Holy Roman Empire” — which was noticed by the clever and ruthlessly greedy of all other persuasions ever since. So, like, duh…..
So, if anyone has a Real SOLUTION better than my plan, I’d love to see it. If not, you might want to check mine at The Greenbook > mm-greenbook.blogspot.com > and be sure to join the Facebook groups > Green Community Credit System & TheFREEparty
Whatever you do or don’t do, I sincerely hope you enjoy the ride to wherever you wind up.
Michael says
“Alice, Your heart is in the right place, but your proposal is really no more practicable than the others. The rulers of the plutonomy, the Big Winners of Plutonomy, the End Game scenario of the unFree world game are not going to let such a radical change occur in their lifetimes.”
Actually its my head thats in the right place – re going back to the tax rates of the 1950s (plus a good shot of “you aint going anywhere” to the free movement of capital – no offshore tax havens and if they dont like it – move out.)
Short of this sensible idea, the US will continue going down (its population is just too big not to fail) and any entrepreneurs will move anyway once they have impoverished and cannibalised their own markets in the US. Nice place to visit but you dont want to run a business where not many can buy. There is only one thing that can reverse this trend and thats government policy, but seeing as the plutocrats have a firm hold on who gets into power for the puppet show at voting time that is not likely either. Politics has been captured.
My heart tells me that no one is going to listen to my head any time soon and they will have to be dragged to the idea of higher taxes on the wealthy and corporates (and higher regulation) kicking and screaming…and it may eventually come to that after a lot of unnecessary hardship anyway, but its the only way the US will improve, sadly.