Home > Uncategorized > Factoid of the day: the closet Keynesians in Estonia

Factoid of the day: the closet Keynesians in Estonia

Estonia does reasonably well, compared with the other Baltic countries (and really well when we look at its government deficit). How is this possible, considering harsh austerity? Well, read this:

“When compared to the previous years, the share of foreign funds in the total expenditures of the budget will increase in years 2011 and 2012 due to the intensifying of the implementation of the structural funds of the EU programme period for years 2007-2013 and will comprise on average approximately 18% of the total expenditure volume. The total planned volume of foreign funds for years 2011-2014 is in excess of 50 bln EEK. One of the government priorities is to use the foreign funds as fast as possible, in order to contribute to enlivening the economy and to creation of jobs. This is why there is a forecast of relatively sharp decline of the volume of supports for years 2013-2014, due to depletion of the funds of the programme period.”

Here’s the link. (look at state budget strategy 2011-2014).

By the way – contrary to the other Baltic countries Estonia did not slash expenditures as much but increased taxes.

About these ads
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. henry1941
    May 19, 2012 at 8:25 pm | #1

    Estonia has some LVT, has it not?

    • merijnknibbe
      May 19, 2012 at 9:00 pm | #2

      It does have a little. But it’s only a relatively small part of total receipts, as far as I remember (I checked this out quite some time ago).

  2. Hepion
    May 20, 2012 at 4:20 pm | #3

    Estonias economy started to grow again (near the double digits, priefly!) as soon as the ABB decided to relocate some gear manufacturing from Sweden to Estonia. It is that tiny. Really.

    • merijnknibbe
      May 20, 2012 at 4:24 pm | #4

      Agree. I’ll soon present some comparable data for Lithuania and Latvia. It does have more than 1 million inhabitants, however, so I include it in the list of European countries which I investigate on an irregular basis on this blog. And indeed: the use of Iceland as an macro-economic example (400.000 inhabitants and rather unusual endownments of land, energy and fish) is sometimes less than convincing.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,287 other followers