United States of financial insecurity
from David Ruccio
The United States is becoming a nation of increasing financial insecurity.
According to a new survey by the Consumer Federation of America (pdf), more Americans find themselves living paycheck to paycheck, forced to reevaluate their expectations for retirement, and falling further behind in terms of their retirement savings.
Clearly, in the midst of the Second Great Depression, more and more Americans are being forced to walk a financial tightrope.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Real World Economics Review
Real World Economics Review
WEA – May 2011 – 11,500+ members
5600 people follow this blog on Twitter
Recent Comments
- lyonwiss on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- paul davidson on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- lyonwiss on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- davetaylor1 on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- paul davidson on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- davetaylor1 on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- Fred Zaman on Creating an Economics for the 21st Century
- lyonwiss on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- Michael Lucas Monterey on The state of economics: Krugman is wrong
- Michael Lucas Monterey on The state of economics: Krugman is wrong
- paul davidson on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- davetaylor1 on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- davetaylor1 on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- Robert Locke on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- paul davidson on Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
Top Posts and Pages- last 48 hours
- Graphs of the day - the investment slump in the Eurozone (3 graphs)
- Paul Davidson at University of chicago economics department seminar
- The state of economics: Krugman is wrong
- Emerging vs. developed countries' GDP growth rates 1986 to 2015
- Creating an Economics for the 21st Century
- IS-LM is bad economics no matter what Krugman says
- FROOPP - or understanding peoples perceptions of inflation (1 graph)
- Graph of the day. Unemployment as a 2 year leading indicator for bank's bad loans
- Connecting the dots—or not (Stiglitz or Krugman)
- Deutsche bank: fifteen shades of fraud
Revere Award in Economics
Dynamite Prize for Economics
Blog Authors
- anmayhew
- Lewis L. Smith
- bruceedmonds
- Kevin P. Gallagher
- deanbaker1
- Steve Keen
- Deniz Kellecioglu
- David F. Ruccio
- donaldgillies
- Peter Dorman
- Editor
- frankackerman
- frankrotering
- Edward Fullbrook
- iettogg
- jamieamorgan
- Jim Stanford
- julieanelson
- Mark Weisbrot
- merijnknibbe
- paul davidson
- Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra
- Peter Earl
- pesod
- peterradford
- paul ormerod
- Peter Earl
- staveren
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
RWER Contributors
Editor: Edward Fullbrook. Associate Editor: Jamie Morgan. PAST CONTRIBUTORS: James Galbraith, Frank Ackerman, André Orléan, Hugh Stretton, Jacques Sapir, Edward Fullbrook, Gilles Raveaud, Deirdre McCloskey, Tony Lawson, Geoff Harcourt, Joseph Halevi, Sheila C. Dow, Kurt Jacobsen, The Cambridge 27, Paul Ormerod, Steve Keen, Grazia Ietto-Gillies, Emmanuelle Benicourt, Le Movement Autisme-Economie, Geoffrey Hodgson, Ben Fine, Michael A. Bernstein, Julie A. Nelson, Jeff Gates, Anne Mayhew, Bruce Edmonds, Jason Potts, John Nightingale, Alan Shipman, Peter E. Earl, Marc Lavoie, Jean Gadrey, Peter Söderbaum, Bernard Guerrien, Susan Feiner, Warren J. Samuels, Katalin Martinás, George M. Frankfurter, Elton G. McGoun, Yanis Varoufakis, Alex Millmow, Bruce J. Caldwell, Poul Thøis Madsen, Helge Peukert, Dietmar Lindenberger, Reiner Kümmel, Jane King, Peter Dorman, K.M.P. Williams, Frank Rotering, Ha-Joon Chang, Claude Mouchot, Robert E. Lane, James G. Devine, Richard Wolff, Jamie Morgan, Robert Heilbroner, William Milberg, Stephen T. Ziliak, Steve Fleetwood, Tony Aspromourgos, Yves Gingras, Ingrid Robeyns, Robert Scott Gassler, Grischa Periono, Esther-Mirjam Sent, Ana Maria Bianchi, Steve Cohn, Peter Wynarczyk, Daniel Gay, Asatar Bair, Nathaniel Chamberland, James Bondio, Jared Ferrie, Goutam U. Jois, Charles K. Wilber, Robert Costanza, Saski Sivramkrishna, Jorge Buzaglo, Jim Stanford, Matthew McCartney, Herman E. Daly, Kyle Siler, Kepa M. Ormazabal, Antonio Garrido, Robert Locke, J. E. King, Paul Davidson, Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra, Kevin Quinn, Trond Andresen, Shaun Hargreaves Heap, Lewis L. Smith, Gautam Mukerjee, Ian Fletcher, Rajni Bakshi, M. Ben-Yami, Deborah Campbell, Irene van Staveren, Neva Goodwin, Thomas Weisskopf, Mehrdad Vahabi, Erik S. Reinert, Jeroen Van Bouwel, Bruce R. McFarling, Pia Malaney, Andrew Spielman, Jeffery Sachs, Julian Edney, Frederic S. Lee, Paul Downward, Andrew Mearman, Dean Baker, Tom Green, David Ellerman, Wolfgang Drechsler, Clay Shirky, Bjørn-Ivar Davidsen, Robert F. Garnett, Jr., François Eymard-Duvernay, Olivier Favereau, Robert Salais, Laurent Thévenot, Mohamed Aslam Haneef, Kurt Rothschild, Jomo K. S., Gustavo Marqués, David F. Ruccio, John Barry, William Kaye-Blake; Michael Ash, Donald Gillies, Kevin P.Gallagher, Lyuba Zarsky, Michel Bauwens, Bruce Cumings, Concetta Balestra, Frank Fagan, Christian Arnsperger, Stanley Alcorn, Ben Solarz, Sanford Jacoby, Kari Polanyi, P. Sainath, Margaret Legum, Juan Carlos Moreno-Brid, Igor Pauno, Ron Morrison, John Schmitt, Ben Zipperer, John B. Davis, Alan Freeman, Andrew Kliman, Philip Ball, Alan Goodacre, Robert McMaster, David A. Bainbridge, Richard Parker, Tim Costello, Brendan Smith, Jeremy Brecher, Peter T. Manicas, Arjo Klamer, Donald MacKenzie, Max Wright, Joseph E. Stiglitz. George Irvin, Frédéric Lordon, James Angresano, Robert Pollin, Heidi Garrett-Peltier, Dani Rodrik, Marcellus Andrews, Riccardo Baldissone, Ted Trainer, Kenneth J. Arrow, Brian Snowdon, Helen Johns, Fanny Coulomb, J. Paul Dunne, Jayati Ghosh, L. A Duhs, Paul Shaffer, Donald W Braben, Roland Fox, Marco Gillies, Joshua C. Hall, Robert A. Lawson, Will Luther, JP Bouchaud, Claude Hillinger, George Soros, David George, Alan Wolfe, Thomas I. Palley, Sean Mallin, Clive Dilnot, Dan Turton, Korkut Ertürk, Gökcer Özgür, Geoff Tily, Jonathan M. Harris, Thomas I. Palley, Jan Kregel, Peter Gowan, David Colander, Hans Foellmer, Armin Haas, Alan Kirman, Katarina Juselius, Brigitte Sloth, Thomas Lux, Luigi Sapaventa, Gunnar Tómasson, Anatole Kaletsky, Robert R Locke, Bill Lucarelli, L. Randall Wray, Mark Weisbrot, Walden Bello, Marvin Brown, Deniz Kellecioglu, Esteban Pérez Caldentey, Matías Vernengo, Thodoris Koutsobinas, David A. Westbrook, Peter Radford, Paul A. David, Richard Smith, Russell Standish, Yeva Nersisyan, Elizabeth Stanton, Jonathan Kirshner, Thomas Wells, Bruce Elmslie, Steve Marglin, Adam Kessler, John Duffield, Mary Mellor, Merijn Knibbe, Michael Hudson, Lars Pålsson Syll, Korkut Erturk, Jane D’Arista, Richard Smith, Ali Kadri, Egmont Kakarot-Handtke, Ozgur Gun, George DeMartino, Robert H. Wade, Silla Sigurgeirsdottir, Victor A. Beker, Pavlina R. Tcherneva, Ali Kadri, Egmont Kakarot-Handtke, Ozgur Gun, George DeMartino, Robert H. Wade, Silla Sigurgeirsdottir, Victor A. Beker, Pavlina R. Tcherneva
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
Family Links
- David Ruccio’s Blog
- Dean Baker Op-Eds and Columns
- Global Development and Environmental Institute
- Mark Weisbrot Op-Eds and Columns
- No Apparent Motive
- Real Climate Economics
- real-world economics review
- Richard Wolff
- Steve Keen’s Debtwatch
- The Progressive Economics Forum
- The Radford Free Press
- Triple Crisis
- Walking Against Australia's Property Mania
Contact
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009



First, I think the consumer federation deserves a great deal of credit for including in the report a lot of details on how the survey was carried out, and raw data, although its’ not clear if hte data is really raw of weighted.
Second,
i think the poster is remiss in not noting that this survey seems designed to help push financial planning.
third, there are bright spots; people are deducing credit card debt, and remarkably (question #39b, page53) almost no one reports an onerous level of college debt.
Actually, Mr. Ruccio, there are suveys, very good, reliable ones, going back to the early part of the last decade that mimic the data you suggest is a post-crisis phenomena. These charts are just the latest versions of similar data that existed for a decade, but was less newsworthy.
As early as 2005 (I’ll have to go back to my files) a consortium of financial planner organizations, insurance companies and financial institutions found that some 30% of the families, not individuals, families, in the U.S. considered themselves in ‘financial distress”.
Another point to consider is that those who felt ok about their retirement savings/investments are now 15 years older, with plenty of time in between to discover how hard it has been to actually make money in the 21st century. So of course those people would feel less secure about their retirement savings, as most people do. There is no state-or-municipal sponsored pension that is not underfunded and at risk. The assumed growth in the value of one’s house, the single largest investment for the middle class (see the fed’s paper on the latest survey of consumer finances, the average family is no better off than 1992), is now not just a myth, but a nightmare. People do not have “careers” anymore, they have “jobs”.
The most consistent issue for virtually all those not in the top 2% or so is that “Knightian Risk” now applies to virtually every financial aspect of most U.S. citizen’s lives. The “unknown unknowns” are the dominant issue in the decision models of most consumers. The implications are obvious.
Buy a house? For decades, it was the predictability of one’s working income that supported the decision to buy. (until the sub-prime jockey’s started convincing anyone still breathing that rising prices made it ok to buy that Rolls-Royce of a house with a teaser rate). Robert Schiller thinks it’s a 20 year downturn. That’s no cyle, eventually, that manifests as homes being bulldozed for lack of viable owners. Schiller knows more about U.S. housing markets than almost any home buyer. By the zip code, no less.
The average useful life of a college education is someting like 18 months, after that, it’s a credential, but not a meal ticket, except in certain very specific sciences. In 1983, one professor told me the “entry level degree” into the biz world had become the MBA. He was right, and “credential inflation” can be found throughout the biz world.
The point is that “uncertainty” has become a central feature to almost every important decision. The company that makes Apple computers in China plans to buy 30,000 robots over three years. Those folks sweating in the Foxconn factories today have no more job security than a Detroit auto worker did 10 years ago.
The crisis of 2008-2009 was just the tipping point in a 20+ year downtrend for income, job security, net worth, and potential lifetime earnings growth for those who would normally be considered “middle class”. Elizabeth Warrent, in “The Two-Income Trap”, documents the growth in family income from the early ’80s on was the result of both adults being wage earners. One result is that they bid up the price of housing in the better school districts, looking for the better life for their children that an integral part of every American parent’s hope for their children. Unfortunately, having a child increases the probability of divorce by a factor of 3, leaving far too many single mothers, and too many households not gaining the benefits of shared housing costs.
What most people do not understand, and economists never discuss, is that at the end of WWII, Americans held $187 Billion in War Bonds. Essentially deferred consumption accumulated as a result of wartime rationing limiting the availability of consumer goods of every kind. The total GDP in 1947 was about the same amount. This was not retirement money, college money, this was essentially forced savings. The bonds sold from 1941-1945 matured over the next ten years, fueling what Americans wistfully refer to as the “golden age of capitalism” (lets not discuss the pollutions, racism, sexism, etc of the era). $187 Billion in savings in 1946 was the equivalent of one full year’s GDP today, except in cash-equivalent savings. Think about the situation today if consumers had a year’s GDP sitting in their bank accounts, or in safe bonds maturing over the next several years. It’s unimaginable really. WWII was the last war that was actually paid for at the time (meaning no “guns and butter” simultaneously). Economists as eminent as Koo, Krugman, and others, recognize that the only thing that ended the Great Depression was wartime spending, starting years before the war in our support of Great Britain. None of them seem to recognize that the enormous amount of savings held by Americans, and the post-war Federal spending on the reconstruction of Europe and Japan had more to do with the economic growth during the post-war quarter century than any magic of “free markets”
This is not an argument against or for any particular economic system, it’s just an insignificant reality check on some part of the history that brought the U.S. to the point illustrated in the graphs in your post.
“This is not an argument against or for any particular economic system, it’s just an insignificant reality check on some part of the history that brought the U.S. to the point illustrated in the graphs in your post.”
I appreciate the statistics, but we knew all this, most of us who have been paying attentiion over the decades. It is policies within the system of capitalism, not historical statistics, that we mostly needed now. Duriing WWII wages increased significantly, consumption was delayed, hence the tremendous savhgs that fueled postwar expannion. So do you advocate a policy of wage expansion through redistribution of wealth or what?. The crisis does not seem to be in the economy but in the leadership classes of America, especially in the social scienttists with the economists leading the pact. The adverage person cannot solve the problems and is quite ready to rely on the economic experts. But from the experts we get mixed signals and confusion, little help. To have spend the past century building up the social sciences in higher education, with so much cluelessness as a result is scandalous. We need the visible hand of leadership expressed effectively through bureaucratic institutions; but the blog is silent about that.. We need government not the politics of cherry picked statistics and silly ideology..