The budget thugs: What do they know about the economy?
from Dean Baker
Ed Haislmaier, a senior scholar at the Heritage Foundation, made himself famous in this video where he appears to be assaulting people protesting a conference organized by Fix the Debt. While this act of bad temper may be uncharacteristic of the public behavior of this corporate-sponsored crusade to cut Social Security and Medicare, it does reflect the way in which they hope to bully their agenda through the political process.
The line from Fix the Debt, an organization that includes the CEOs of many of the country’s largest corporations, and allies like the Washington Post is that we better have cuts to Social Security and Medicare because they say so. Note that they did not try to push this line in the elections. Everyone knows that cuts to these programs are hugely unpopular across the political spectrum.
The Fix the Debt strategy was explicitly to wait until after the election. They would then go into high gear pushing their agenda of cutting Social Security and Medicare regardless of who won the elections. Remember, we need these cuts because they say so.
It is worth repeating the “they say so” part; because this is the only way we could know that cuts to Social Security and Medicare are necessary. It is possible to tell stories about countries where a meltdown in financial markets forced sharp budget cuts, but there is zero evidence of that for the United States. Investors are willing to lend the U.S. government vast amounts of money at extremely low interest rates. The only reason that we have for believing that financial markets will panic if we don’t have the Social Security and Medicare cuts the Debt Fixers want is because they say so.
For this reason it is worth considering what the Debt Fixers know or don’t know about the economy. This meaning bringing up a still fresh wound; why did none of these people see the housing bubble whose collapse wrecked the economy?
It is important to understand the bubble was not hard to see. Nor did it require much knowledge of economics to realize that its collapse would devastate the economy.
The bubble was an unprecedented nationwide run-up in house prices. For the 100 years from 1896 to 1996 nationwide house prices had on average just tracked the overall rate of inflation. In the decade from 1996 to 2006 house prices rose by more than 70 percentage points in excess of the rate of inflation.
How could anyone following the economy miss this? There are reports on house prices released every month; did none of the Debt Fixers ever look at them during the bubble years?
And there was no explanation for this extraordinary run up of prices in the fundamentals of the housing market. Population and income growth in the last decade were slow, not fast. And there was no corresponding increase in rents. If fundamentals were driving the explosion in house prices then there should have been some pressure on rents as well. And, vacancy rates were hitting all-time highs. How does that fit with a supply and demand story driving up house prices?
The fact that the housing bubble was driving the economy was also not hard to see. Typically housing construction is less than 4.0 percent of GDP. It peaked at more than 6.0 percent of GDP in 2005. Couldn’t the Debt Fixers find the GDP data released every month by the Commerce Department?
Housing wealth was also driving a consumption boom as the saving rate fell to nearly zero in the years from 2004-2007. Did the Debt Fixers think that people would keep borrowing against their homes when the equity in their homes disappeared?
The bursting of the bubble meant a loss in annual demand of more than $1 trillion when the construction and consumption boom both collapsed. What exactly did the Debt Fixers think would replace this demand?
Did they think that firms would suddenly double their investment as they saw their markets collapse? Did they think that consumers would just spend like crazy even as their housing wealth vanished? If they have a theory as to how the economy could quickly replace the demand generated by the housing bubble without large government budget deficits, it would be great if they would share.
The reality is that the Debt Fixers and their allied economists and policy wonks saw none of the above. They were completely out to lunch in their understanding of the economy.
The Debt Fixers and their allies will have to explain for themselves how they managed to miss something as huge and important to the economy as the housing bubble. However missing an $8 trillion housing bubble is not a small mistake. It is the sort of thing that in other lines of work gets you fired and sent looking for a new career.
What would Michelle Rhee, the hero of the “school reform” movement, do to a public school teacher if all their students had huge drops in scores from the prior year? The economic experts among the Debt Fixers all fit this failed teacher description.
This means that when we get a whole bunch of seemingly important and knowledgeable people telling us that we must cut Social Security and Medicare because the markets demand it, we have to remember that these are people who just recently were shown to be completely out to lunch in their economic judgment. If the Debt Fixers expect the country to take their pronouncements seriously, they should be forced to answer one simple question: when did you stop being wrong about the economy?
Real World Economics Review
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
- F. Beard on 4% in 40 years
- Macrocompassion on 4% in 40 years
- Macrocompassion on Mainstream economics teaching in the late 20th Century
- robert r locke on Mainstream economics teaching in the late 20th Century
- philippe101 on Unemployment: is there always a market clearing price? (Netherlands very long run edition).
- Hepion on Mainstream economics teaching in the late 20th Century
- Asad Zaman on Mainstream economics teaching in the late 20th Century
- Ken Zimmerman on Mainstream economics teaching in the late 20th Century
- Guerrien on Mainstream economics teaching in the late 20th Century
- Asad Zaman on Mainstream economics teaching in the late 20th Century
- Liam B Allone on Steve Hanke (Cato institute) acts like the Orwellian ‘minister of truth’
- BC on 4% in 40 years
- Asymptosis on Revealed preference theory — redundant fuss about almost nothing
- Garrett Connelly on 4% in 40 years
- chdwr on Krugman and Mankiw on loanable funds — so wrong, so wrong
Top Posts and Pages- last 48 hours
- Mainstream economics teaching in the late 20th Century
- Existence of transmission mechanisms
- Summary of the Great Transformation by Polanyi
- The French labour market: more flexibility led to petrification and a poverty trap
- 4% in 40 years
- Reflections on the “Inside Job”
- Emerging vs. developed countries' GDP growth rates 1986 to 2015
- The myth that sold the financial bailout
- The importance of rhetoric
- "Sack the Economists"
Recent books by RWER contributors
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
- Lewis L. Smith
- Kevin P. Gallagher
- Steve Keen
- Deniz Kellecioglu
- David F. Ruccio
- Peter Dorman
- Edward Fullbrook
- Jim Stanford
- Mark Weisbrot
- paul davidson
- Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra
- Peter Earl
- paul ormerod
- Peter Earl