Home > Uncategorized > Why Jens Weidmann, president of the Bundesbank, is wrong about monetary financing and debt

Why Jens Weidmann, president of the Bundesbank, is wrong about monetary financing and debt

According to this speech, Jens Weidmann is obsessed with government deficits as a government deficit might entice politicians to use monetary financing to finance it. But it wasn’t the monetary financing of government deficits which got Europe in trouble. Monetary financing of real estate booms did, in combination with a flawed design of the monetary system, did. Monetary financing of real estate booms led to large deficits on current accounts, increases in private debts which were not matched by increases in wages, house price inflation and, when the bubble burst, house price declines without matching debt relieve. Debts are the largest rigidity in our economy – a flaw in the design of out monetary system.

And we all know the troubles this caused, for instance in Ireland.

Graph 1 shows Irish mortgage debt, comparable graphs can be made for Spain, the Netherlands, the Baltic states etcetera. Monetary financial institutions (MFI’s) have the remarkable prerogative to finance their loans with newly created money, other lenders (like pension funds) have to attract savings first. MFI’s have offloaded a lot of their mortgages to ‘Special Purpose Vehicles’, it is only since June 2010 that the ECB systematically monetary statistics take account of this in a systematical way (which might mean that they underrated pre June 2010 money growth).

Remember: Ireland has only about 4 million inhabitants…

Irish mortgage debt

About these ads
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. January 1, 2013 at 6:35 pm

    Non-monetary financing is monetary financing lent a second time as existing money. Now there are two debts of the SAME Principal. According to this chart, Total Principal debt owed is 190 Billion, which exceeds the Principal in existence (150 billion) by $40 billion Euro
    Any slowdown in the creation of new bank credit debt has the potential of causing up to 40 billion Euros in mathematically inevitable defaults because of “perpetual debt”, the same Principal lent multiple times. The only possible offsets are banks creating new money to buy equities and governments creating new money as national taxpayer debt.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 10,494 other followers