The Supercommittee should go really big and turn against The One Percent

from Dean Baker

It looks the supercommittee is about to throw in the towel. Since the potential deals that had been discussed would have meant large cuts to Social Security, Medicare and other programs that the 99 percent depend upon, we should all be thankful.

In the world of the 1 percent that the supercommittee types inhabit, the big villains in the U.S. economy are not the rich who are pulling down an ever-larger share of national income, but rather the country’s older workers. 

“Can Pharma Thrive With a Plutonomy Strategy?”

from Edward Fullbrook

In May of this year The Economist had a an article http://www.economist.com/node/18743951 describing how in the United States plutonomy was causing

a shift in how big drug firms do business. For years they have relied on blockbusters that treat many people. Now they are investing in more personalised medicine: biotech drugs that treat small groups of patients more effectively.

It explained how

new cancer drugs offer small benefits at an exorbitant price. Provenge costs $93,000 for a course of treatment and extends life by an average of four months. Yervoy costs $120,000 for three-and-a-half months.

Obviously only the ultra-rich will genrally be able to afford them.

This week members of the US medical profession have reacted.

The efficiency of the US health-care system relative to those of other wealthy countries

from John Schmitt

Lane Kenworthy has posted two extremely helpful graphs that try to gauge the efficiency of the US health-care system relative to those of other wealthy countries. The first shows life expectancy in each country, in 2007, against per-capita health expenditures in the same year.