Outsourcing grading
from David Ruccio
Every time I think I’ve seen it all in the new corporate university, they come up with another one. The latest is the outsourcing of grading.
I heard the story the other day on the radio (you hear a lot of news over the course of a 15-hour drive!) and then found it in the Chronicle of Higher Education. Apparently, Virtual-TA, a subsidiary of a company called EduMetry Inc., offers the service of grading exams and papers (the figure I heard was $12 a paper). The selling points are that “assessors” provide extensive comments and return the graded assignments in a timely manner.
What’s the alternative? To use the money to hire more classroom instructors and teaching assistants. But it seems that’s not part of the mission of the new corporate university.
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books

follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Chicago economics — nothing but pseudo-scientific cheating
- The big three’s CEOs are ripping off their companies
- What is heterodox economics?
- Keen, Roubini and Baker win Revere Award for Economics
- Rizzo goes for the guild
- There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- Rethinking public debt
- Re-thinking the Definition of “Public Goods”
- Comments on RWER issue no 107
- The difference between logic and science
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Ilcd on There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- FROMTINATOTARA on Rethinking public debt
- David Harold Chester on What is heterodox economics?
- David Harold Chester on Rethinking public debt
- metaecongary on What is heterodox economics?
- Dr Keith McNaughton on What is heterodox economics?
- FROMTINATOTARA on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rizzo goes for the guild
- David Harold Chester on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rethinking public debt
- John Hermann on The Chinese threat in critical minerals
- graziaiettogillies on Diverting class warfare into generational warfare
- ghholtham on Casino capitalism
- Meta Capitalism on Cochrane on PRICE-GOUGING
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)

























Is a corporate university mean a private university, or are governmentally owned universities included, and would a non-profit organization qualify? Does it mean that corporations provide grants or funding? Evidently the meaning in this piece differs from that in wikipedia:
“a corporate university typically limits scope to providing job-specific, indeed company-specific, training for the managerial personnel of the parent corporation…. Perhaps the best known corporate university is the Hamburger University operated by McDonald’s Corporation in Chicago.
The way I’m using the term, corporate university refers to any college or university, public or private, that has so been transformed that it operates more like a corporation than a university. The new corporate university is thus based on the commodification of research and teaching, and governance based on administrators instead of the faculty.
When I was a TA I could grade 5-10 papers/tests per hour, depending on the mix of questions. At $12/paper that’s $60 to $120 per hour for TAs. Even taking into account inflation no TA then or now is paid anywhere near this level. And TAs don’t have a choice about being timely in completing scoring. So tell me again why is this kind of over-priced outsourcing attactive? Or to be a lot more cynical who’s getting the kick-backs and how much are policy-makers being paid to adopt this “more competitive option?”
They could have paid me $12 a paper to grade years ago but the new coprate unis were too ctingy. What does “grade a paper pty ltd” have that I dont? Im a better marker. They wont be employing my quality.
Fine – go that way. Corporate unis already are a joke.