Not a Recession? Then what do we call it?
from Edward Fullbrook
Below is a graph from the New York Times.

Sources: Analysis of Current Population Survey data by Gordon W. Green Jr. and John F. Coder, Sentier Research
Median real household income in the United States is now over ten percent lower than what it was at the end of the last century. And over 60% of that decline has taken place since “the end of the recession” in June 2009.
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books

follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- The big three’s CEOs are ripping off their companies
- Chicago economics — nothing but pseudo-scientific cheating
- What is heterodox economics?
- Keen, Roubini and Baker win Revere Award for Economics
- Rizzo goes for the guild
- There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- The difference between logic and science
- Re-thinking the Definition of “Public Goods”
- Comments on RWER issue no 107
- The current state of game theory
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Ilcd on There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- FROMTINATOTARA on Rethinking public debt
- David Harold Chester on What is heterodox economics?
- David Harold Chester on Rethinking public debt
- metaecongary on What is heterodox economics?
- Dr Keith McNaughton on What is heterodox economics?
- FROMTINATOTARA on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rizzo goes for the guild
- David Harold Chester on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rethinking public debt
- John Hermann on The Chinese threat in critical minerals
- graziaiettogillies on Diverting class warfare into generational warfare
- ghholtham on Casino capitalism
- Meta Capitalism on Cochrane on PRICE-GOUGING
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)

























a recession is when your neighbo is out of work. A depression is when you are out of work.
More evidence that the 99% dont matter…it must be the consumption of the 1% that is keeping us out of a technical depression. The plutonomy is saved again by the sleight of hand of statistics.
Ed et al, Thanks. Now, I’m going to have to look up that brilliant RWE guy who “discovered” the truth about “recessions” which he correctly identified as the aftermath of “fleecing the wee sheeple” or “big feeding frenzy” if you prefer a more apt analogy. Alice, good call, but a bit broad and I see no indication that the “new” interpretation of cooked books is either new or an end of the End Game scenario, the twilight of the false gods & demi-gods of the Big Game. What I mean is, who believes the happy talk or the Pimp & Ho Show now?
I’m in Seattle, which is way better off than almost everywhere other than North Dakota, and I have yet to meet anyone who sees the Emperor’s New Clothes. Paul, that’s a cool joke, but as you know, about 60% to 70% of the wee adult sheeple can have jobs during a depression — so what? It’s quality of life, standard of living, cultural progress, and creative evolution that really matter to most human beings I know.
I think I need to talk to Dr. Amertya Sen about all this. I’d bet that his assessment and suggestions are worth considering. Have you discussed the current phase of the process with him yet?
Agree Michael – “cooked books” is indeed nothing new at all but at least in the past they just conveniently dropped a few of the minority groups out of the stats to make the odd pollitician more comfortable until his time was up – now the book cooking is really really hot so as to convince the majority via mass msm “nothing wrong here in this economy folks – move right along”.
Just a tad blatant isnt it?
Michael.
What Dr Amartya Sen might say is this
“The Athenian intellectuals discussing equality did not find it particularly obnoxious to leave out the slaves from the orbit of discourse and one reason why they could do it was because they could get away with it.” (On Economic Inequality – 1972)
Well the 1% got away with telling governments how to run policy (to suit themselves) for decades and then how to solve the crash (ditto) and the rest is.. history.
They got away with it.