RWER issue 58: Peter Radford
Ethics in economics – Where is it?
Peter Radford download pdf
Read and leave comments here
And register for the WEA online conference: Economics in Society: The Ethical Dimension
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
RWER 26,498 subscribers
Regular Contributors
Comments on recent RWER issues
Real World Economics Review
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
Edward Fullbrook and Jamie Morgan
————— Michael Hudson ————–
Maria Alejandra Madi / Jack Reardon
—————— Steve Keen —————–
————— Richard Smith —————
————– Gustavo Marques————
– Victor Beker and Beniamino Moro –
————– Lars Pålsson Syll ————-
—————– Stuart Birks —————-
Edward Fullbrook and Jamie Morgan
————- Edward Fullbrook ————-
follow this blog on Twitter
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Craig on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- Craig on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- Risk Analyst on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- peggydobbins on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- Pavlos Papageorgiou on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- Pavlos Papageorgiou on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- Craig on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- peggydobbins on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- peggydobbins on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- Michael Kowalik on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- Craig on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- Michael Kowalik on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- Frans Doorman on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- Econoclast on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- peggydobbins on Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- Forthcoming WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-
Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan
————— Mauro Gallegati ————–
————— Herman Daly —————-
————— Asad Zaman —————
—————– C. T. Kurien —————
————— Robert Locke —————-
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Top Posts and Pages- last 48 hours
- Mainstream monetary theory — neat, plausible, and utterly wrong
- What do unions do?
- Summary of the Great Transformation by Polanyi
- Bread and roses
- The 15 largest arms exporters per capita
- Brexit, don’t forget how we got here
- Paul Krugman, Bernie Sanders, and the Experts
- 25 graphics showing upward redistribution of income and wealth in USA since 1979
- Re-thinking the Definition of “Public Goods”
- Discussing "Can we avoid another financial crisis?"
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
Family Links
- C. P. Chandrasekhar’s Blog
- David Ruccio’s Blog
- Dean Baker – Beat the Press
- Jayati Ghosh’s Blog
- Lars Syll's Blog
- Mark Weisbrot
- Norbert Haering' Blog
- real-world economics review
- Steve Keen’s Debtwatch
- The Progressive Economics Forum
- The Radford Free Press
- Thomas Palley
- WEA Pedagogy Bog
- WEA Young Economists Network
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
Revere Award in Economics
Dynamite Prize for Economics
Blog Authors
- anmayhew
- Asad Zaman
- Lewis L. Smith
- bruceedmonds
- Kevin P. Gallagher
- deanbaker1
- Steve Keen
- Deniz Kellecioglu
- David F. Ruccio
- donaldgillies
- Peter Dorman
- Editor
- frankackerman
- frankrotering
- Edward Fullbrook
- iettogg
- jamieamorgan
- Jim Stanford
- julieanelson
- Lars Syll
- Maria Alejandra Madi
- Mark Weisbrot
- merijntknibbe
- njhaering
- paul davidson
- Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra
- Peter Earl
- pesod
- peterradford
- paul ormerod
- Peter Earl
- staveren
Bravo Peter Radford!
Economics without ethics is an empty mental exercise. The ethics of economics are exceedingly simple. They can be reduced to this one maxim: Do not steal.
If you do not pay taxes on land and natural resources that are under your exclusive command, you steal from members of your community who will have to pay correspondingly higher taxes.
If you enjoy exclusive use of access to national credit, a common good, you steal from others in your community who will to pay you interest for their loans.
If you pay wages, you steal from your workers the fruits of capital appreciation.
If you agglomerate wealth into your hands using unethically acquired financial resources, you steal future capital appreciation from existing owners.
Yay!!! Bravo & kudos, Peter. Yet, let’s not forget the Golden Rule (not the plutocrat version): “Treat others as you would have them treat you.” – King Yshuah
Carmine, notions about taxation lacking comprehensive grounding in a big picture view of all the negative factors in a commercialized economy or plutonomy are inherently deficient. In a valid, viable, nonprofit money system managed by a government of, by, and for We the people, personal income tax and most other taxes are worse than unnecessary. It’s like robbing Peter to pay Paul, then robbing Paul to pay Peter, over and over and…
The current socioeconomic paradigm makes tax a way to get the 99% to pay double for everything while interest on debts drains the culture of its vitality and strength. Letting sociopathic privateers control the money system is exactly what Jefferson, among others, warned would enslave the world.
The cure is the whole truth + pure credit. See:
>> mm-greenbook.blogspot.com
Michael, it is good to see how much we agree. May I encourage you to contribute a Buddhist perspective on ethics in economics?
Dave, Friends & Allies, Season’s greetings & Christmas blessings to all. Now, Schumacher did an essay on Buddhist economics that probably covers the subject pretty well from the conventional standpoint. Yet, knowing what he never covered helped to inspire an exploration of the deepest, source level, causal principles & governing dynamics that led to my Fundamental Theory of Economics & Natural Values.
You can review the final final draft at EcotectureNOW.wordpress.com/unmoney along with some relevant posts from RWER blogs & comments that follow the theory.
I look forward to your feedback. If I continue getting no response, then I will have to assume that RW economists are as autistically egoic as the average plutonomist. After all, the only thing that could possibly prevent a co-creative response would be ethical shock & paralysis and/or neurotic/psychotic denial, right?