Euro area and E27 unemployment rates
from David Ruccio
The euro area1 (EA17) seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was 11.0 percent in April 2012. It was 9.9 percent in April 2011. The EU27 unemployment rate was 10.3 percent in April 2012. It was 9.5 percent in April 2011.
In April 2012, 5.462 million young people (under 25) were unemployed in the EU27, of whom 3.358 million were in the euro area. Compared with April 2011, youth unemployment rose by 268 000 in the EU27 and by 214 000 in the euro area. In April 2012, the youth unemployment rate was 22.4 percent in the EU27 and 22.2 percent in the euro area. In April 2011 it was 20.9 percent and 20.4 percent, respectively. The lowest rates were observed in Germany (7.9 percent), Austria (8.9 percent) and the Netherlands (9.4 percent), and the highest in Greece (52.7 percent in February 2012) and Spain (51.5 percent).
Update
Here, from the same source, are the rates for individual countries:
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
RWER 26,369 subscribers
WEA Books
“a conceivably seminal contribution to this debate on economic systems and their place in human and natural systems.” – Steve Keen

“Some of his insights will no doubt become the key building blocks of the new economics the world needs so desperately today.” – Richard Koo

“This remarkable volume presents the full range of opinions on MMT, from its enthusiastic proponents to its severest critics” – John King

Regular Contributors
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Weekend read - MMT, post-Keynesians and currency hierarchy: Notes towards a synthesis
- Crypto-crash: graph
- Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Lock Step: How the Rockefeller Foundation wants to implement its autocratic pandemic scenario
- Formalizing economic theory
- The threat of a pharma-dictatorship
- Gödel and the limits of mathematics
- Statistical inference and sampling assumptions
- Oligarchs—American style
- Weekend read - Has economics — really — become an empirical science?
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- scottonthespot on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Meta Capitalism on Statistical inference and sampling assumptions
- Meta Capitalism on Statistical inference and sampling assumptions
- ghholtham on Statistical inference and sampling assumptions
- evidencebasedeconomics on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Romar Correa on Weekend read – MMT, post-Keynesians and currency hierarchy: Notes towards a synthesis
- yoshinorishiozawa on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Hepion on The magnitude of the required reductions
- Meta Capitalism on Gödel and the limits of mathematics
- Meta Capitalism on Gödel and the limits of mathematics
- Edward Ross on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Meta Capitalism on Gödel and the limits of mathematics
- Econoclast on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Romar Correa on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Kevin Cox on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
The steady rise in unemployment in 2011-12 is a bad omen. However, these are averages. How about a graph for individual countries?
A graph of individual countries is somewhat beside the point, in that the ECB should be responding to EU-wide unemployment. Instead, it is largely responding unemployment in Germany, which is causing damage to the people of many other countries.
The people in the Eurozone need jobs. The governments in the Eurozone need money. Why not answer the combined two needs by issuing debt-free money apart from the central banks, directly into the economy through a series of public works projects, doing what needs to be done, putting people to work, and doing it without debt?
In the U.S. we do this with every coin – for which no debt is created, unlike Federal Reserve money. In the past, we did this with U.S. Notes (14 times – 1862-1972). Then, when the economy is robust again, the tax* revenues (and taxes are optional under a Greenbacking system anyway, but should be collected to promote fairness and to discourage speculative and resource-hoarding behavior) could eventually pay off the debt. Ironically, going to direct currency issuance, at least in part, would make it easier to pay off the debt created under the current debt-money system.
* The only fair tax is a Land Value Tax
Unemployment rates these days are so high. we really need some economic bailout. ‘
<a href="Look at our very own homepage too
http://www.foodsupplementdigest.com/niacin-flush/