Joerg Asmussen and other people’s money
The news is already all over the place: total building costs of the new ECB buildings in Frankfurt won’t be about 850 million but about 1,2 billion (or about 700.000,– per employee, according to my data).
1. Oops. That’s about the same amount of money as in the original 2008 budget…
.
2. But the really interesting thing: Joerg Asmussen is the board member who’s responsible. Yes, the same Joerg Asmussen who, according to the speeches published by the ECB, is the board member most eager to cut other people’s wages, most scornful about over-optimistic government budgets and most enthusiastic about the blessings of austerity. Outside Frankfurt.
But at least the ECB is honest about it.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
RWER 26,369 subscribers
WEA Books
“a conceivably seminal contribution to this debate on economic systems and their place in human and natural systems.” – Steve Keen

“Some of his insights will no doubt become the key building blocks of the new economics the world needs so desperately today.” – Richard Koo

“This remarkable volume presents the full range of opinions on MMT, from its enthusiastic proponents to its severest critics” – John King

Regular Contributors
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Crypto-crash: graph
- Weekend read - MMT, post-Keynesians and currency hierarchy: Notes towards a synthesis
- Formalizing economic theory
- Lock Step: How the Rockefeller Foundation wants to implement its autocratic pandemic scenario
- Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- The threat of a pharma-dictatorship
- Gödel and the limits of mathematics
- Statistical inference and sampling assumptions
- Oligarchs—American style
- Economics phrasebook
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- scottonthespot on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Meta Capitalism on Statistical inference and sampling assumptions
- Meta Capitalism on Statistical inference and sampling assumptions
- ghholtham on Statistical inference and sampling assumptions
- evidencebasedeconomics on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Romar Correa on Weekend read – MMT, post-Keynesians and currency hierarchy: Notes towards a synthesis
- yoshinorishiozawa on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Hepion on The magnitude of the required reductions
- Meta Capitalism on Gödel and the limits of mathematics
- Meta Capitalism on Gödel and the limits of mathematics
- Edward Ross on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Meta Capitalism on Gödel and the limits of mathematics
- Econoclast on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Romar Correa on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
- Kevin Cox on Can you think of something snappier than “Understanding the Economy – A Learning System”?
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
That´s indeed quite interesting. Thank you for that little piece of information.
Greetings
SLE
Isnt that the case just so often?
Whats good enough for the goose just isnt good enough for the grander.
Nice – the ECB preaches the most austere of austerity measures for european nations but houses itself in luxury befitting traditional deficit hawks (who in IMHO should be shot out of the sky as traitors to most nations and most people just now.).
In thevery same way that neoclassical economists refuse to take repsonsibility for impoverishing nations, these members of the ECB can apparently applaud themselves for creating unnecessarily grandiose accommodation for themselves whilst preaching welfare cuts for the poor.
Maybe its really time to see who Central banks work for. Private baning institutions, not the people or the economy.
Central banks are a farce.
is 700,000 euros per employee a lot or a little ?
a la Kahneman, et al, you need the base rate and to avoid framing
I think the base rate or ref class would be, What is the cost of new office space, per employee, built recently in similar cities ?
without this info, we have no idea if 1.2 is a lot or a little
of course, this would require real work, as opposed to dashing off a quick blog post with some links
Also, for the last 2,000 years or so, gov’t buildings ahve been a symbol of gov’t strength and prosperity, as are Church buildings, that is, gov’t buildings in general cost more
P.S. – the 1200 mentioned in my earlier reply is full time units, the calculation in the blog is based upon about 1800 people. And yes, 1,2 billion is a lot. Anyway – “the hubris, the hubris…”.
Dear Ezra, thank you for putting me to work. It turned out that the building is slightly oversized:
“The new building will also contain space for at least 2,500 employees — nearly double the 1,300 who currently work at the bank (at this moment according to my information— as the ECB anticipates the day when the euro’s reach has expanded to Eastern Europe, all of Scandinavia and perhaps even Britain.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/16/news/16iht-ecb_ed3_.html?_r=0
At this moment, there seem to be about 1.200 full time staff.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/international-business/european-business/ecb-staff-warn-of-unsustainable-workload/article4387183/
I wonder what will be done with the building when the EMU folds – squatter housing?