Sometimes a graph says more than a thousand words (25 countries – inequality and mobility)
from Lars Syll
you thought that inequality was no problem, I think you should take a look at this graph:

The vertical axis shows how much a one percent rise in the income of your father affects your expected income (the higher the number, the lower is the expected social mobility). On the horizontal axis is the Gini coefficient, which is a measure of inequality (the higher the number, the higher is the inequality).
Sometimes a graph says more than a thousand words …
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books

follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Chicago economics — nothing but pseudo-scientific cheating
- The big three’s CEOs are ripping off their companies
- What is heterodox economics?
- Keen, Roubini and Baker win Revere Award for Economics
- Rizzo goes for the guild
- There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- Rethinking public debt
- Re-thinking the Definition of “Public Goods”
- Comments on RWER issue no 107
- The difference between logic and science
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Ilcd on There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- FROMTINATOTARA on Rethinking public debt
- David Harold Chester on What is heterodox economics?
- David Harold Chester on Rethinking public debt
- metaecongary on What is heterodox economics?
- Dr Keith McNaughton on What is heterodox economics?
- FROMTINATOTARA on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rizzo goes for the guild
- David Harold Chester on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rethinking public debt
- John Hermann on The Chinese threat in critical minerals
- graziaiettogillies on Diverting class warfare into generational warfare
- ghholtham on Casino capitalism
- Meta Capitalism on Cochrane on PRICE-GOUGING
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)

























Inverting the Y-axis and labeling it “social mobility” would make more sense.
How about this for an explanation? The Scandinavian countries had land reforms at different times in the past 350 years and supported these with some form of land value taxation. Probably the same has happened in Germany. The UK has a concentration of land ownership – aristocratic families and indirectly through the banks, and the rents flow into a few hands, often under the heading of mortgage interest payments. The countries at the extreme end have mineral and other natural resources which also yield rents which are appropriated by a handful.
Norway’s resource rents are collected and put into a national wealth fund.