Home > The Economics Profession > Re-writing the history of the housing bubble and the economic crisis

Re-writing the history of the housing bubble and the economic crisis

from Dean Baker

The story of the housing bubble is an incredible tragedy. The collapse of the bubble has wreaked havoc on the lives of tens of millions of people by leaving them or family members unemployed, destroying savings and costing millions their homes.

The simple reality is bad enough, but what makes matters worse is that the whole episode was entirely preventable. As early as 2002 it was possible to recognize that house prices had sharply diverged from their long-term trend without any basis in the fundamentals of the housing market. 

Since we had just seen the rise and collapse of a $10 trillion bubble in the stock market it should have been apparent to economists that our economy can generate large bubbles. The collapse of that bubble had thrown the U.S. economy into a recession, from which we were having considerable difficulty recovering, so it should have occurred to economists that the collapse of the housing bubble would also be bad news for the economy.

At least a few of us did recognize the housing bubble, and the dangers it posed at the time, and did everything we could to try to warn the country. For this reason it was somewhat shocking to see a book review in the New York Times by Noam Scheiber, an editor at the New Republic, that longed for the day when we will have people who can use data to identify housing bubbles before they grow so large as to pose a serious danger to the economy.

The personal slight is beside the point; the issue is that our elites are being allowed to construct an alternative reality that absolves them of responsibility for the ruined lives all around us. The reality is that people in positions of authority chose to ignore the evidence of a rapidly growing bubble and those trying to call attention to the dangers it posed. Instead we have Scheiber giving us the “who could have known story?” His case is that the dynamics of the bubble were just too complicated for people to grasp given the tools available at the time. The people who clearly warned of the bubble, using data, simply did not exist in Scheiber’s universe.

If it were just Scheiber saying this on a rant somewhere, he could be easily dismissed as a crank. While he is a prominent writer on policy and politics, prominent writers say ridiculous things all the times.

But this was not just a random rant. It was a book review in the New York Times, by far the nation’s most prestigious newspaper. It is a paper that employs fact checkers and prides itself on accuracy. Would the NYT allow a book reviewer to bemoan the fact that no one had questioned the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq prior to the war?

And the bubble warners were not entirely below the NYT’s radar screen. In fact, several NYT reporters had picked up on warnings of the housing bubble (here and here). In fact, Paul Krugman, perhaps the most famous economist in the world, used his NYT column in 2002 to warn of the dangers posed by the housing bubble.

Given this history, how can an ill-informed book reviewer get away with making what is obviously an untrue assertion in an NYT book review? The simple answer is that Scheiber’s “who could have known” story is quite comforting to people with power in this country. The people in positions of authority who ignored the warnings of the dangers of the housing bubble would like the public to believe that there were no such warnings. It is much easier for them to act as though the state of economic knowledge was too primitive to allow them to see a bubble than to acknowledge that they simply did not feel like paying attention to the warnings.

It is important to their legitimacy to maintain this fiction, since with virtually no exceptions the people guiding economic policy today are the same people who ignored the growth of the bubble in the last decade. If everyone recognized the enormity of their failure they would be less likely to heed their calls for austerity: for example the cuts in Social Security and Medicare that virtually everyone in the higher circles of the policy establishment agrees are necessary.

That is why it is necessary to keep reminding the public that the policy elite blew it. The tools of economics were entirely adequate to see the housing bubble and the dangers that it posed to the economy. The problem is that the people who controlled economic policy at the time found it convenient to ignore the evidence. They still do.

See article on original website

  1. Douglas
    November 16, 2012 at 1:49 pm

    The hard part was not being able to see the housing bubble. Taxi drivers and cleaning ladies flipping houses? It was Tulip Mania all over again apparent to anyone who could fog up a mirror..

  2. PHayes
    November 16, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    Potentially a more believable reasoning is that the power elite were in denial – intentional or self-deceiving – about the bubble. And, after all, there are many among that group who have profited handsomely from the bubble… not all the generated wealth of the bubble disappeared…

  3. November 16, 2012 at 3:31 pm

    I have a PBS video in which Brooksley Born is trying to warn Paulsen and Bernanke etc of the dangers of the unregulated derivatives called CDS when she was head of the CFTC. The old boys club literally shut her down. So it wasn’t only about the bubble. The dangers were in the entire financial sector’s handling of that bubble……with no oversight/regulation.

  4. ezra abrams
    November 16, 2012 at 5:39 pm

    Dr Baker is mis representing what the book review said
    Here is the full quote from the NYT
    “That Silver is taking this on is, by and large, a welcome development. Few journalists have the statistical chops; most scientists and social scientists are too abstruse. Though his approach doesn’t apply to every issue, it’s not hard to imagine Silver and his ilk one day letting the air out of an inflating housing bubble, or unmasking tobacco-company spin, by appealing to nothing but the numbers. ”

    Perhaps Dr Baker should re read Dr Galbraith on reviewing, and consider that in the future, negative comments where he is personally involved are not a good idea

  5. November 16, 2012 at 10:18 pm

    I suggest that economists should become involved in the socially positive step to buy the mortgages and free the people by forgiving the debt. http://rollingjubilee.org/

    • November 17, 2012 at 4:38 pm

      Sounds about right to me, Garrett. Sadly, the way things are going I foresee a re-run of the story of the unforgiving debtor at Mark 18:23-35, who ends up deservedly handed over to the torturers, rather than that of the crafty steward at Luke 16, who when found out, made friends by writing down his customer’s debts.

  6. November 17, 2012 at 10:43 am

    Boom Bust: House Prices, Banking and the Depression of 2010. Published 2005. Puts the blame on economists who have forgotten about land.

  7. November 18, 2012 at 3:12 am

    Yay Dean. I, like many of the greenest most talented architectural designers, was an early victim, ruined of the crash. You see, companies and future custom home owners need plans in advance of loans and construction. Anyway, since the best of us are still suffering the aftermath and being prevented from contributing our best possible work to The Solution of the ecological [and integral energy] crisis, your simple explanation and revelations cannot be re-emphasized too much. Yet, it sure looks like we’re all in for much more of the Plutonomy world-game’s End Game scenario. Yep, fewer and bigger winners and WAAAAY more little losers losing WAY more than they thought possible. One of my few consolations is that it will inevitably catch up with even the economists who pimped it and the appeasers as well. Karma, the universal Law of Interdependent Interaction, is unbreakable. Thanks & Ciao

  8. November 19, 2012 at 9:35 am

    You don’t need to predict it, you need to prevent it. The only reliable way to do that is with a Land Value Tax that automatically adjusts to choke off land speculation before it can start, returning the wealth of the commons in location back to those who created it in the first place, the community, not the land owners. Do this, and you’ll put an end to land bubbles and busts forever, and generate so much revenue for government besides that you can untax all productive activity: wages, sales and true capital.

    • November 19, 2012 at 10:02 am

      Yes, that’s what I was going to say:o)

  9. November 19, 2012 at 4:13 pm

    Beyond the housing bubble, by 2004 it was painfully obvious to see in The Fed’s own reports that household debt had increased by triple-digit percentages from 1989-2004, while Census Bureau data showed for the same period household income for the lower 80 percentile had all but stagnated. Either Greenspan was being very obtuse, or he simply didn’t care, latching onto housing – anything – to sustain economic growth in the aftermath of the 2001 tech bubble bursting.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s