Only three fields have a percentage of female authors lower than in Economics
from David Ruccio
Only three fields have a percentage of female authors lower than in Economics: Philosophy (12.1 percent), Mathematics (10.7 percent), and Operations Research (11.8 percent).
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
RWER 26,369 subscribers
Regular Contributors
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Labor’s share — the ‘stylized fact’ that isn’t a fact at all
- There are two price levels in capitalism
- How to make economics a relevant science again
- Uncertain
- Summary of the Great Transformation by Polanyi
- Wars have become too cheap to boost growth
- Beyond behavioral economics: the self-governance of nudging
- Reflections on the “Inside Job”
- A new mode of production?
- Problems with Pareto optimality
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- political economist on Beyond behavioral economics: the self-governance of nudging
- Ikonoclast on Your model is consistent? So what?
- Ikonoclast on How to make economics a relevant science again
- n8chz on A new mode of production?
- Ikonoclast on Uncertain
- Frank Salter on Labor’s share — the ‘stylized fact’ that isn’t a fact at all
- Mike Ryan on Labor’s share — the ‘stylized fact’ that isn’t a fact at all
- davetaylor1 on How to make economics a relevant science again
- Mike Ryan on Uncertain
- Robert Locke on How to make economics a relevant science again
- Rob Reno on Econometric beasts of bias
- Rob Reno on Your model is consistent? So what?
- davetaylor1 on How to make economics a relevant science again
- davetaylor1 on Uncertain
- davetaylor1 on Uncertain
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- Forthcoming WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
Family Links
- C. P. Chandrasekhar’s Blog
- David Ruccio’s Blog
- Dean Baker – Beat the Press
- Jayati Ghosh’s Blog
- Lars Syll's Blog
- Mark Weisbrot
- Norbert Haering' Blog
- real-world economics review
- Steve Keen’s Debtwatch
- The Progressive Economics Forum
- The Radford Free Press
- Thomas Palley
- WEA Pedagogy Bog
- WEA Young Economists Network
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
Revere Award in Economics
Dynamite Prize for Economics
Blog Authors
- anmayhew
- Asad Zaman
- Lewis L. Smith
- bruceedmonds
- Kevin P. Gallagher
- deanbaker1
- Steve Keen
- Deniz Kellecioglu
- David F. Ruccio
- donaldgillies
- Peter Dorman
- Editor
- frankackerman
- frankrotering
- Edward Fullbrook
- iettogg
- jamieamorgan
- Jim Stanford
- julieanelson
- Lars Syll
- Maria Alejandra Madi
- Mark Weisbrot
- merijntknibbe
- njhaering
- paul davidson
- Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra
- Peter Earl
- pesod
- peterradford
- paul ormerod
- Peter Earl
- staveren
















That is ironic considering the origin of the word economics – household management.
I was the only female in my cohort and the only person to make it through to the PhD…….but I was disappointed during my grad classes. I can do math but I complained that we lost the economics portions during those first two years of intensive solving of problems using calc etc…….by the end of it, I had no incentive to write papers that no one would read (I also did a master’s in Library Informations Systems and was told that 1/3 of one person reads any academic paper on average) and that explained nothing other than how clever I was at using mathematics…….I guess I am saying my graduate experience was eye opening and had I not been a persevering type I would have left as many others did.
Well I know what Larry Summers would say about this gender discrepancy. The disciplines listed are generally mathematical based. Larry Summers states that women are just not biologically equipped to do maths at a high level. I guess he thinks there is a ‘maths’ gene linked to the development of gonads.
http://web.archive.org/web/20080130023006/http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/2005/nber.html