Home > Uncategorized > A 1963 critique of neoclassical economics. Did anything change?

A 1963 critique of neoclassical economics. Did anything change?

In 1963 Hans Alberts, Darrell Arnold and Frank Maier-Rigaud published a ‘critique’ of neoclassical economics which recently has been translated into english. It’s depressing: despite all the valid points they make the dominance of neoclassical economics has only increased – remember that before around 1963 Arrow still dared to publish his ‘Arrow-paradox‘ of social indifference curves (adding different neoclassical individual indifference curves does not lead to a neoclassical social indifference curves) while even Gary Becker published an article which implicated that we do not need neoclassical indifference curves to derive the downward sloping demand curve… After around 1963, however, the ranks closed.

And despite such devastating criticisms from their own ranks, despite the criticisms voiced in the Alberts e.a. article, despite overwhelming new neurological evidence that neoclassical ‘utility’ is a figment of the ‘left brain interpreter‘ made up after our choices and despite all these neoclassical economic historians which, after carefull study of real people and real societies, left the neoclassical building, Robert Lucas style ”We are the Borg’ social indifference curves and money and debt does not matter’ kinds of thinking still rules. Well, the example of the historians show that not all is lost. Sometimes, resistance is not futile. So, here a snippet from the article:

In my view, it should not have only been possible for us to have learned from Max Weber that the dominant style of economic activity in many parts of the world is a social product,that it has a traceable historical development, and that it may be subject to great alterations in the future. It should also have been possible for us to have drawn the obvious consequence of his studies for theory formation; namely that it will only lead to general insights if it penetrates behind the quasi-invariances of the economic style that began with the industrial economy. Changing economic studies in accord with these insights would require a decisive shift in theoretical perspective, a shift that would perhaps resemble traditionally heterodox currents of economic thought more than the pure economics of the neoclassical variety
  1. February 26, 2014 at 8:46 am
    • davetaylor1
      February 26, 2014 at 11:50 am

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_brain_interpreter.

      “In 2002 Gazzaniga stated that the three decades of research in the field had taught him that the left hemisphere is far more inventive in interpreting facts than the right hemisphere’s more truthful, literal approach to information management.[8]”

      Misinterpretations come easily, but facts don’t lie.

      • February 26, 2014 at 11:59 am

        Do you mean that leftists can’t think, in the same way that “white men can’t jump”? :-)

      • davetaylor1
        February 26, 2014 at 1:47 pm

        Rather the opposite, though it is a question of left brain (indicated by right hand) dominance rather than “can’t” think, and there are different types of thinking. Symbolic mathematics involves left-brain thinking; the Euclidian way of doing geometry uses diagrams via which the right brain can unambiguously and verifiably relate the mathematics to reality. In computing we talk about object-oriented programming as against number-crunching. reality which structures which

      • February 26, 2014 at 2:02 pm

        But what exactly do you mean about my post? You make it more complicated than you have to

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: