4 charts showing increasing inequality in the USA
from David Ruccio
Let’s end the year with some important charts assembled by Steven Rattner.
Yes, economic growth picked up and financial markets soared to new record highs. But—and it’s a big but—wages remained stagnant (barely budging in real terms), income inequality got worse (increasing from already grotesque levels), the tiny minority at the top made out like bandits (just as they were doing before 2007), and government programs (even with a Democratic president and Senate) did little to ameliorate the effects of stagnant wages and growing inequality.
That’s what 2014 looked like in the United States. And nothing about 2015 looks to change those trends.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books

follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Irrational Exuberance — Robert Shiller’s modern classic
- India’s central bank launches new campaign against cash
- In Thrall to the Infallible Hand
- Economic methodology — Lawson, Mäki, and Syll
- The Religion of Economics
- Comments on rwer issue no 93
- CO2 since the start of the Industrial Revolution
- The Keynes-Tinbergen debate on econometrics
- We can do better with a thousand years
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Ikonoclast on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Asad Zaman on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- George H. Blackford on Economic methodology — Lawson, Mäki, and Syll
- Ikonoclast on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Ikonoclast on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Steven Klees on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Asad Zaman on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Ikonoclast on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Asad Zaman on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Gerald Holtham on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Steven Klees on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Gerald Holtham on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Gerald Holtham on Economic methodology — Lawson, Mäki, and Syll
- Meta Capitalism on The Religion of Economics
- Meta Capitalism on In Thrall to the Infallible Hand
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
any data on France?
Whatever is happening to us David, is happening within the framework of a greater game plan. One that doesn’t favor the average individual. That’s the understanding that is missing from all this dialogue. When I read it, I’m reminded of the financial analysis that I hear on CNN and the other television stations with regard to the cause of current conditions. “This fluctuation in the market is due to the uneasiness of investors regarding this, or this or this, and etc. Our best advice is to just stay the course.” Why? Because you will suffer less by doing so than if you were invested elsewhere, even though more and more equity is being sucked out to the market by those manipulating it, reducing your position. That’s the nice thing about low interest rates. It gives the investor (suckers) legitimate cause to stay in the game and be taken advantage of.
Commentators and economists are always sucking “hind tit” in this equation, trying to make sense out of things from one perspective while the cause for what they see is actually driven by another. And don’t be fooled here, this is exactly what the elite want, everybody, reacting to what to what they do. If anything is going to turn around in this unjust equation, we need to seize the bull by the horns and figure out a way to make it happen. And, it doesn’t come through voting, the other big lie perpetrated on the public. Both candidates are already bought and paid for long before the public gets to select one off the back of negative campaign advertising.
Some of my colleagues believe that I am wasting my time preaching to the deaf, dumb and blind. However, I still maintain that everyone has something important to contribute to making a difference. So, I will ask again. Can we please come together here and try to figure out a tangible way to make a real difference in this world, before it is too late?