Home > Uncategorized > Links. Drowning job seekers, fuzzy asset prices, the trouble with real estate banking.

Links. Drowning job seekers, fuzzy asset prices, the trouble with real estate banking.

1) More than 300 people searching for work and a better life drown in the Mediterranean.

“The UN’s refugee agency, UNHCR, says more migrants are dying because search and rescue efforts have been reduced. Italy’s major patrol and rescue operation ended last year. A smaller scale EU operation, Triton, took over. The UNHCR says about 3,500 migrants died trying to cross the Mediterranean Sea to Europe in 2014.”

2) The problem with NIIP (Net International Investment Position). Does running a current account surplus for decades make a country richer? Not necessarily so. For one thing, it is quite difficult to estimate the value of ‘NIIP’. For another, the net position is the result of large gross positions, which means that a limited decline of the value assets may turn a positive net position into a negative position despite positive current account flows, which is what happened in the Dutch case. For quite some time, the decline of the value of international financial assets was larger than the (whopping) current account surpluses of the Netherlands.

3) Real-estate banking crowds out productive investment: “We also find some evidence of a financial Dutch disease – the faster the growth of financial services and the larger the lending-deposit interest spread, the slower the growth of the manufacturing sector”.

4) During the housing busts the number of houses sold often declined faster and more than prices. Why? According to Moen, Nenov and Sniekers this is about the balance between ‘buyers’ and ‘sellers’. When the ratio of sellers vs. buyers reaches a threshold, many people who wanted to buy first and sell their own house later change their mind and want to sell first, therewith increasing the ratio and pushing the housing market to a new, much lower equilibrium.

5) For quite some time, many pension funds assumed an 8% a year nominal return on investment (ROI) ‘forever’. Which was daft: way too high. It however seems that, at this moment, we are making the opposite mistake. The Dutch ABP pension fund (one of the largest in the world) had 14,5% ROI in 2014, an average of 6,5% between 2007 and 2014 (i.e. including the 20% setback in 2008) and between 1993 and 2014  – 7,9%. For the future, it is however forced to calculate with about 1,9% ROI (and declining)… which means that despite the 14,5% real ROI in 2014 pensions are not indexed. Nobody of course expected negative consumer price inflation in 2015, so I do not know if that’s a problem, but the point is that this 1,9% is equal to the ECB inflation target and it’s not too much to expect that long run ROI will be at least slightly above this. This, of course, does ad to the deflationary pressures in the economy. And maybe, just maybe the ECB target is not credible.

 

  1. Marko
    February 15, 2015 at 9:27 pm

    3) “ We also find some evidence of a financial Dutch disease…..”

    In the US , the Great Depression resulted from a particularly virulent strain of financial Dutch disease. We successfully ( and sensibly ) inoculated ourselves against a repeat occurrence by bombing the finance sector back to the Stone Age. By ~1945 the finance sector was about the size it was in the the early 1900s as a share of gdp :

    By 1980 it had recovered to about the 1920 level. During those 35 years , we seemed to have more than enough finance to support healthy economic growth , but somebody decided we needed more finance – much more. They also decided we needed smarter and more highly compensated financiers :

    They also decided that we needed to reverse all those finance-repressing regulations that had been put in place post-Depression :

    I suppose you could argue that this all made sense. After all , if your goal is to saturate the globe with a $quadrillion in complex WMD financial derivatives , and you want to be able to steal investor and government funds by manipulating markets – like Libor , forex , commodities , etc. – then you need a bunch of really smart bankers to do so. And they’d have to be well-paid since , as Piketty noted , they tend to have ravenous appetites for consumption – of regulators , politicians , think tanks , economists , and such.

    Still , given that bombing finance back to the Stone Age worked so well after the Depression , and given the Dutch disease similarities of the Depression to the recent GFC , wouldn’t another bombing campaign be worth a shot ?

    Starting , let’s say , tomorrow ?

    • Marko
      February 15, 2015 at 9:31 pm

      Let me try that first link again :

    • Marko
      February 15, 2015 at 9:47 pm

      BTW , these guys have mapped out where we need to drop the bombs , as well as the required tonnage so as to avoid “collateral damage” ( i.e. achieve only bankster casualties ) :

      http://whitepapers.stern.nyu.edu/home.html

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s