Home > The Economy > The problem is not globalization, it is selective protectionism

The problem is not globalization, it is selective protectionism

from Dean Baker

In an interesting piece on the decline of the political center, E.J. Dionne wrongly lists globalization as a villain. He tells readers:

“Globalization weakens the ability of moderate governments of both varieties to deliver on their promises. Capital can flee easily to more congenial climes, undercutting a nation’s tax base and its regulatory efforts.”

Globalization should also have the effect of reducing inequality by making it easier to take advantage of lower cost professional services (e.g. physicians services, lawyers’ services, dentists’ services) except that the United States has acted to maintain or even increase barriers to trade in these areas. It should also make it easier to circumvent patent and copyright monopolies that redistribute income upward, except we have consciously pursued policies to strengthen these forms of monopolies to limit the extent to which developing countries might provide vehicles for avoidance (in contrast to tax policy).

Also, governments with their own currency (e.g. the United States, the U.K., and the euro zone collectively) need not be restricted by their tax take in terms of spending, as long as they are below full employment. The decision not to use fiscal policy to bring economies to full employment is due to superstitions, not actual limits imposed by globalization.

 


advertisement    WEA eBooks

The Scientist and the Church

by Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan    $20    337 pages

IntroductionBichlerNitzan1
1. Capital as Power: Toward a New Cosmology of Capitalism
2.  The Asymptotes of Power
3. The Capitalist Algorithm
4. How Capitalists Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Crisis
5. Still About Oil?
6. Imperialism and Financialism: The Story of a Nexus
7.  No Way Out: Crime, Punishment and the Capitalization of Power
8. The 1%, Exploitation and Wealth
9. Capitalism as a Mode of Power
10.  Aki and Friends
11. The Scientist and the Church

  1. August 19, 2015 at 7:08 am

    I like the words “selective protectionism”. Globalisation is not bad policy but it has been discontented.

  2. mike
    August 19, 2015 at 4:12 pm

    “The problem is not communism. It is selective individualism.”

  3. paul davidson
    August 19, 2015 at 4:17 pm

    Globalization reduces the price of dental services? Really? Should I send my teeth to India to have a cavity filled or a cap put on a tooth? Or send the hold mouth in order to have a tooth implanted??

    Or should I take an airline to India or China every time I need some dental work or even a dental check up?? And what about braces on children’s teeth? Should the children be send to India or China for braces to be installed and then every couple of weeks for adjustment to braces? And children should not travel by themselves over such distances so the whole family (or at least one parent) should but airline tickets, hotel accomodations, etc.

    What a price to pay???

    And as someone who had his first book that was published here in the USA, pirated by some Chinese publisher and sold in China — I can assure you that this prevented me from joining the top 1% from all the royalties I otherwise would have earned –)..

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s