Home > Uncategorized > Two books which I haven’t read, yet.

Two books which I haven’t read, yet.

Two books which I haven’t read (yet). Reviews welcome.

Piet Keizer (full disclosure: former teacher of mine):
Multidisciplinary Economics. A methodological account.

Part I: Science, Social Science, Economics
1: Introduction
2: The Character of Science
3: Genesis and Development of Economics and Sociology
Part II: Orthodox Economics
4: Orthodox Microeconomics
5: Orthodox Macroeconomics
Part III: Heterodox Economics
6: Evolution and Entrepreneurship, an Evolutionary and an Austrian View
7: Radical Economics
8: Post-Keynesian Economics
9: Social Economics
Part IV: Psychology for Economists
10: Psychology for Economists
Part V: Sociology for Economists
11: Macro and Micro Approaches in Sociology
12: The Historical Approach in Sociology
13: Multidisciplinary Sociology and The Social World
Part VI: Towards an Integration of the Three worlds
14: Integration of the Three Worlds
15: Applications of the Multi-motivational Framework of Interpretation
Part VII: Conclusions
16: Conclusions
A. The Logical World
B. Kant for Economists
C. Jung for Economists
D. Adam Smith as the Founding Father of Multidisciplinary Economics

And William Mitchell,

Eurozone Dystopia. Groupthink and Denial on a Grand Scale

Eurozone Dystopia traces the origin of the Eurozone and shows how the historical Franco-German rivalry combined with the growing dominance of neo-liberal economic thinking to create a monetary system that was deeply flawed and destined to fail. William Mitchell argues that the political class in Europe is trapped in a destructive groupthink. Based on a flawed understanding of macroeconomic fundamentals, groupthink extols the virtues of the erroneous concept of the self-regulating free market and prevents Europe from seeing its own policy failures. As a result, millions are unemployed, with imperilled member states caught in a cycle of persistent stagnation and rising social instability.

Providing a detailed historical analysis of the evolution of the Eurozone and its failings from the 1940s to the present day, the book argues that the Eurozone lacks the necessary monetary architecture, particularly the existence of a federal fiscal function which could have resolved the economic crisis quickly. The author examines the options available to Europe and concludes that an orderly abandonment of the euro and a return to national currencies is the superior option available. The justification for this conclusion is exhaustively argued within a Modern Monetary Theory framework.

This thoughtful and accessible account of Europe’s economic woes will appeal to all those who are seeking an explanation for the crisis and are receptive to sensible and credible alternatives to the current scenario.

  1. September 2, 2015 at 4:33 pm

    There is only one book that must be read:: ***** “Believe nothing merely because you have been told it…But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis,you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit,the welfare of all beings – that doctrine believe and cling to,and take it as your guide.”- Buddha
    Read and challenge:
    Frederick Soddy writings, namely “The Role Of Money”
    (Entire book as a free download…) http://archive.org/details/roleofmoney032861mbp

  2. louisperetzperetz
    September 2, 2015 at 6:10 pm

    A new book, (digital or paper), which brings Keynesian theory in the modern world : “Money, how to flip the table off”. The monetarism seen as a vector. Sold by Amazon.

  3. September 3, 2015 at 6:17 am

    Dear Merijn Knibbe, I have read the latter, but it is rather challenging to summarize his account. I would be interest though in reviewing the former book. If this post is meant as an invitation for reviews, then I’d gladly receive more information about timetables and such at paujon [at] utu.fi My background is in public administration (Europese bestuurskunde, Universiteit Twente) but I wrote my PhD for Sociology (University of Turku, Finland). My key interests are labour market relations and economic sociology, so I feel qualified for reviewing that book.
    Regards, Paul Jonker-Hoffrén

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s