Home > Uncategorized > Real world economists and the economics curriculum

Real world economists and the economics curriculum

from Maria Alejandra Madi and WEA Pedagogy Blog

Keynes’ attempt to re-shape the world order in the 1940s highlighted the need of an international currency system that might only work by means of a “wide measure of agreement”, that is, by means of the creation of a new international convention. In Keynes’ time, this convention would rely on multiple needs: an international currency, a stable exchange rate system, redistribution of international reserves, stabilizing mechanisms, sources of liquidity, besides a central institution to aid and support other international institutions related to the planning and regulation of the world economic life. In our times, new convention-conducing institutions could foster financial regulation.

As global finance has subordinated the outcomes of social reproduction, the main question is, as Hyman Minsky warned, Who will benefit? The recent global crisis has indicated that the structure and dynamics of current global finance, as a historical set of institutions, products, procedures, behaviors and policies have potentially materialized the risk of collapse of the financial system with deep negative consequences for the real economy and society. In order to support sustainable development, it’s time to stimulate students to rethink global finance, as well as its policy agenda about global and corporate governance, prudential regulation and supervision of systemic risk.   read more

  1. October 13, 2015 at 6:38 am

    Mady: I am in fully in agreement that this topic needs INTENSE study. Current financial system is DISASTROUSLY bad. To fix it will require HARD WORK in generating consensus — which will first have to break through a huge FOG of obfuscations which confuse people about the nature of money and finance. Many of these extremely bad theories are being taught as gospel truth in leading universities. The central myth about money is the Quantity Theory which suggests the money is veil, which we have to look through to get to the real economy. The strange thing is the Keynes clearly states that money is of importance in both short and long run, contrary to QTM. In fact the QTM itself is a veil — it hides the real nature and function of money and banks, which is essential to allow this highly unjust system to continue. This is just deals with the domestic creation of money — the international finance adds a substantial additional level of complexity. Again, current system is highly inequitable and provides huge powers to the big players — the top 85 people who own more than half the wealth of the entire planet.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s