Home > Uncategorized > Anti-cash warrior Summers finally discloses his enormous conflicts of interest

Anti-cash warrior Summers finally discloses his enormous conflicts of interest

from Norbert Häring

For years, former treasury secretary and Harvard-professor Larry Summers has been the most prominent voice in favor of getting rid of cash. For years, he has ignored all ethics rules of professional organizations, which demand of professional academics to disclose any information about potential conflicts of interest whenever they publish their findings or take a stand in public discussion. Now, finally he came clean.

When Larry Summers started the campaign for abolishing cash and moving to a cashless society, as in his speech in front of the IMF in 2013 the argument was, that cash was in the way of interest rates going as low as needed in a stubborn low-growth environment. In the current debate,  in which the German government and the ECB have chosen to use the argument of illicit financing of terrorism and tax evasion to justify a planned ban on larger cash transactions and the abolishment of the 500-Euro-note, Summers is opportunistically switching to the same argument in his quest for the cashless society. In a column that appeared on February 16  in the FT, the Washington Post and others, he argued for abolishing the $100-bill. He pointed to a “study” by a Harvard Professor Peter Sands, which purports to show, but simply claims with the most superficial evidence, that getting rid of large denomination banknotes would reduce crime significantly.

It turns out, if you look into it a little more closely, that Sands is a sacked former bank CEO with no academic credentials, who received shelter last summer in Summers Harvard-department and was quite obviously put to work by Summers to put together this piece of propaganda, which Summers then used to justify his push to “kill the $100-bill”. Neither in Summers blog, nor in the “study” do Summers or Sands disclose Sands’ recent role as the CEO of an institution, which might benefit from the move to a cashless society. However, one does learn in the acknowledgments, that “many politicians, central bankers and senior officials from various governments … were enormously generous with their time and wisdom as I prepared this paper.”

In a new column published on February 25, Sands and Summers jointly defend their proposal. This time, both the FT and the Washington Post run a disclosure that says that Sands was CEO of Standard Chartered and, even more interesting, that Summers  “serves as an adviser or board member to a number of financial technology and payments companies”.

The Washington Post on their website also retroactively included this disclosure as an addendum into the first column.

If had let it be known earlier, that the main proponent of moving to a cashless society is an advisor to or board member of “a number of” the institutions who stand to benefit the most financially from such an endeavor, many people would have seen his proposal in a whole different light.

Summers role in the tight inner circle of anti-cash-campaigners, all tightly linked to the Group of 30, Harvard, MIT and the International Financial Institutions in Washington is explored in my forthcoming book (in German on April 11 by Quadriga) “Die Abschaffung des Bargeld und die Folgen” (The Consequences of Abolishing Cash)

  1. avneroffer
    February 26, 2016 at 3:05 pm

    One issue that I haven’t seen mentioned in the cashless debate is the increased capacity for social control and tyranny. Quite apart from every single financial transaction being on record, it will be possible for the authorities to lock anyone out of the means of subisistence with or without reason or the possiblity of appeal. The UK government currently is quite relaxed about depriving welfare beneficiaries of the means of subsistence for months on end for small technical infringements (like failing to attend the benefit office, even for good reason). Now they want to deprive them of using cash.
    They won’t even be able to beg (plenty of beggars in my town).

    • Larry Motuz
      February 26, 2016 at 8:12 pm

      Thank you, Avneroffer.

      Also, negative interest rates on deposits would become unavoidable…and major sources of revenue for banks.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s