Home > Uncategorized > Get ready for an Australian recession by 2017

Get ready for an Australian recession by 2017

from Steve Keen

For the last 25 years, Australian politicians of both Liberal and Labor hue have been able to brag that, under their stewardship, Australia has avoided a recession. Those bragging rights are about to come to an end. During the life of the next Parliament — and probably by 2017 — Australia will fall into a prolonged recession.

Whichever party is in opposition at the time will blame the incumbent, but in reality this recession has been set up by the sidestep both parties have used to avoid downturns for the past quarter century: whenever a crisis has loomed, they’ve avoided recession by encouraging the private sector to borrow and spend.

The end product of that is starkly evident in a new database on private and government debt published by the Bank of International Settlements. Australia’s most famous recession sidestep was during the GFC, when it was one of only two countries in the OECD to avoid experiencing two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth (the other country was South Korea). Since then, the private sectors of the advanced countries have collectively de-levered, reducing their debt levels from about 170 to 160 per cent of GDP. Australia, in stark contrast, has levered up. Our private debt to GDP ratio is now more than 20 per cent higher than when the GFC began, and more than 50 per cent higher than in the USA (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: Australia has borrowed its way out of recession for the last 25 years

160321Keen1-kjeC-GalleryLanscape650x488-650x488.jpg

This credit sidestep has worked because the extra debt-financed expenditure lifted aggregate demand and income well above what it would have been in the absence of a debt binge (see Figure 2).

Figure 2: Rising debt increases demand but falling debt reduces it

160321Keen2-kjeC-U502832327738vDI-650x488.jpg

Unfortunately for Australia’s next Prime Minister, there are two catches to this trick. The obvious catch is that getting that much extra demand out of credit necessarily increases debt much faster than it increases income — hence the runaway ratio of debt to GDP shown in Figure 1 — and this can’t go on forever. The less obvious one is that when debt is at stratospheric levels that apply in Australia today, total demand falls even if the debt ratio merely stabilises.

The logic is pretty simple: your spending in a year is the total of what you earn plus what you borrow, and the same maths applies to the economy as a whole.

If nominal GDP grows this year at the 2.8 per cent rate it has averaged for the last five years, then GDP in 2016 will be roughly $1,634 billion. If private debt continues to grow at its average rate of 6.9 per cent per year, it will reach $3,414 billion — an increase of $220 billion over the year. Total private sector demand (which is spent on both goods and services and asset purchases) will be $1,855 billion.

What about 2017, if private debt grows at the same rate as GDP itself, so that the debt ratio stabilises? Then GDP will be $1,680bn, and private debt will rise from $3,414bn to $3,509bn — an increase of just $96bn over the year (compared to $220bn the year before). The sum of the two will be $1,775bn — 4.3 per cent less than the year before.

This is the inevitable debt crunch coming Australia’s way, but conventional economists are oblivious to this danger because they’ve brainwashed themselves to ignore private debt as just a “pure redistribution”, to quote Ben Bernanke. This deluded textbook thinking is why Bernanke didn’t see the GFC coming.

The day of reckoning can be delayed by encouraging yet more private borrowing, which the RBA can attempt to do by cutting interest rates, and the government can reduce the crunch by running a large budget deficit. But these are likely to happen after a crisis rather than before it, because our Reserve Bank and our politicians are as oblivious to the dangers of private debt today as Bernanke was back in 2007.

The 2016 election could be a good one to lose.

  1. March 22, 2016 at 5:53 pm

    “The logic is pretty simple: your spending in a year is the total of what you earn plus what you borrow, and the same maths applies to the economy as a whole.”

    Sort of… There are capital requirements for creating products of consumption, but if you ignore those or just fold those into the consumption numbers, then the spending for the economy as a whole is equal to the inner product of the appetite of the members of the economy with their means of consumption.

    There is no such thing as not having enough money to grow because everybody’s debt is someone else’s assets, but there is such a thing as not having enough money falling under the satiation line of your consumers to grow. Note that money can be converted to goods in an inflation/deflation neutral manner by pretending that workers are paid as a percentage of the value they offer the ability to create instead of being paid in abstract dollars.

  2. Neville
    March 22, 2016 at 11:09 pm

    Steve Keen is on the money as at least three Australian states are in recession already. A significant proportion of mortgage loans are “interest only” with dubious ability to pay backing. Real incomes are in decline and real employment participation is over-stated. Construction is at the end of it’s cycle and no replacement for employment after the mining boom is in place. Traditional economics has let us down (except Minsky) and I welcome the attempts to instil an updated body of knowledge.

    • March 24, 2016 at 8:01 pm

      I agree with much of what you wrote.

      “(except Minsky)”

      …and possibly Arthur Pigou. Although I have a quibble with Minsky at least as his argument is usually presented. He talks about confidence creating artificial stability, leading to bigger crashes when they do come. I would replace confidence at least in part with bigger pockets among those seeking investments rather than consumption. Remember that the long bond since 1980 has been more a supply and demand story than a confidence story.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s