Home > Uncategorized > Betrayed again: TPP’s unconvincing economic and national security arguments

Betrayed again: TPP’s unconvincing economic and national security arguments

from Thomas Palley

Voters of all stripes have recognized the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) as another betrayal of working people, and they have resoundingly rejected it. Despite that, President Obama continues to push it, to the extent of possibly seeking passage in a “lame duck” session of Congress.

President Obama’s pushing of the TPP is recklessly irresponsible politics that benefits Donald Trump who is the outsider candidate. Hillary Clinton is the insider who has touted her links to President Obama, and she still lacks credibility regarding her TPP opposition because of her past endorsement.

In the current dangerous political climate there is no room for error. Yet, that is what we have. Clinton has refused to condemn the TPP in the Democratic Party platform, setting herself up for Trump. Not only does she risk handing the issue to Trump, giving him the economic high-ground, she also sets herself up as “crooked Hillary”. She was for the TPP, then she was against it, and now she is for it again? That plays into voters’ worst assessment of her character.

As for President Obama, he must be made to realize that every time he pushes the TPP, he might as well be campaigning for Donald Trump. 

Unconvincing economic arguments

The TPP’s economic arguments are unconvincing. Past agreements stand discredited, having resulted in lost manufacturing jobs; worsened trade deficits; and wage stagnation.

Economic models show trivially small estimated gains, despite the fact these models are rigged by assumption to show gains. The models assume full employment; deny negative demand effects of trade deficits; and deny costs from closing and offshoring factories. The trivial gains are tantamount to dis-proof.

Worse yet, the TPP’s extended drug patent and software copyright provisions will be like a massive tax on ordinary Americans and others, and will ultimately kill millions who cannot afford medications. These provisions are the opposite of removing barriers. They create barriers via government sponsored monopoly, lobbied for by corporations.

Lastly, the TPP fails to address the glaring problem of currency manipulation that has so injured American workers. Currency manipulation gives countries an unfair exchange rate subsidy. Even the world’s most efficient producers cannot compete when rivals get a 30 percent currency subsidy.

Unconvincing national security arguments

Unable to win the economic argument, the Obama administration is cynically pushing unconvincing national security arguments that the TPP is needed to hem in China.

Past agreements have already done great national security damage by hollowing the industrial base needed for military provisioning; by transferring that base plus technology to China, giving it industrial might and high-tech weaponry; and by creating a global supply-chain that runs through China, giving it power to choke off supply and also making countries further down the supply-chain beholden to China.

Worst of all, by eroding the US manufacturing base and making China the world’s factory, past agreements have massively increased China’s geopolitical power. In today’s world, commerce is the currency of power. China can now provide manufactured goods and investment capital in return for oil and commodities. That explains China’s power in Africa, Latin America, and Australasia. The US was preeminent, but it unilaterally deindustrialized at the request of multinational corporations which wanted cheap production platforms in China.

American workers have already paid massively for past agreements. Now, they are being asked to pay again to fix national security breaches those agreements created. However, there is zero evidence the TPP works as a fix and it could even backfire. Simultaneously, there is clear evidence of hypocrisy in the TPP’s lax “rules of origin” which will allow corporations to smuggle in Chinese products as “made in America”.

A final spurious argument is our allies expect the TPP to pass because they have negotiated in good faith, putting US credibility and face on the line. The world knows, or should know, that the US does not sign agreements of massive economic and possible national security import on the basis of saving-face.

Dangerous to democracy

Perhaps the most powerful argument against the TPP is its danger to democracy. Its investor – state dispute settlement gives foreign investors, including US-owned foreign corporations, rights to sue the US government in private courts under privately appointed arbitrators. Companies can sue for lost profits resulting from changes in regulation, non-exempted by the TPP, that voters want or governments deem needed.

That grants corporations a private judicial system which can over-rule US law and the will of the people. It is a colossal and terrifying surrender of sovereignty that promises to castrate democratic governance as we know it.

TPP is about global governance, not free trade

The TPP masquerades as a “trade agreement”, when it is in fact a “global governance agreement” that empowers and enriches corporations at the expense of voters and workers.

Corporations and establishment economists call it a trade agreement as that is favorable verbal terrain for business because the public is steeped in the loaded language of “free trade”. If the TPP were described as a “global governance agreement” that would immediately surface the enormity of the issues and the irresponsible undemocratic process pushing it.

A new world order is being smuggled in using the rhetoric of “free trade” and the economic zombie of comparative advantage. Today, trade is not driven by comparative advantage: it is driven by “Barge economics”. It is as if companies float their factories and offices around the world to get access to the cheapest most exploitable labor, to take advantage of under-valued currencies, and to take advantage of unregulated economies without standards. That is not comparative advantage: it is exploitation by global arbitrage.

TPP cannot be saved and must be stopped

The TPP cannot be saved because it is fundamentally flawed. It is not a matter of adding more generous trade adjustment assistance to compensate job losers. Nor is it a matter of sweetening the legislative pot by adding a large infrastructure package to the bill. Though both are desirable, that would be political bribery aimed at greasing a tragically bad bargain.

The TPP rests on faulty economics and leads in the wrong direction. Rather than fostering shared prosperity, it further locks-in the corporate globalization model that has already created grotesque income inequality and undermined our future.

It must be stopped. That is the only way to clear the political stage for a worker-friendly approach to global governance. Remaining “market access” negotiating leverage must not be squandered on the TPP. It must be used to reverse existing dire arrangements and shape a future global race to the top.

The TPP reflects the flawed economics and arrogant politics of Wall Street and the national security establishment that has betrayed working people. It must be rendered the economics and politics of the past, or else it could hand the future to Donald Trump. Mr. President, wake up and smell the coffee.

  1. Allan Sleeman
    July 12, 2016 at 6:22 pm

    You did not give links in your paragraph on the economics. If you have time I would like to see what the gains look like.

  2. July 13, 2016 at 9:44 am

    How can you say all these mean things about the TPP? According to the TPP’s official web site, the agreement would level “…the playing field for American workers and American businesses, leading to more Made-in-America exports and more higher-paying American jobs here at home. By cutting over 18,000 taxes different countries put on Made-in-America products, TPP makes sure our farmers, ranchers, manufacturers, service suppliers, and small businesses can compete — and win — in some of the fastest growing markets in the world. With more than 95 percent of the world’s consumers living outside our borders, TPP will significantly expand the export of Made-in-America goods and services and support American jobs.”

    As for regulation, “Through the Regulatory Coherence chapter, the United States is seeking to foster an open, fair, and predictable regulatory environment for U.S. businesses operating in Asia-Pacific markets, including through principles that are central features of the U.S. regulatory process, such as transparency, 140 impartiality, and due process as well as coordination across the government to ensure a coherent regulatory approach. The chapter does not affect the rights of the United States or other TPP Parties to regulate for public health, safety, worker and environmental protections, security, financial stability, and other public interest reasons, nor will anything in it require changes to U.S. regulations or U.S. regulatory procedures.”

    Even the TPP’s chapter on Investment doesn’t sound bad. It “…strengthens the rule of law in the Asia-Pacific region, deters foreign governments from imposing discriminatory or abusive requirements on American investors, and protects the right to regulate in the public interest. To this end, it ensures that American investors have effective remedies in the event of a breach of their rights, while reforming the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) system by providing for tools to dismiss frivolous claims and instituting a range of other procedural and substantive safeguards.”

    Taken at face value the provisions of the TPP could be beneficial to many countries and many workers in those countries. But the TPP will not be taken at face value. I’ve read the agreement cover to cover. There are literally dozens of openings in the document’s language and structure for mischief and there are hundreds of companies, questionable lawyers and diplomats, and just plain greedy bastards who will exploit each of these word turns or document structure. As for the US don’t expect the Congress or the President (whether Clinton or Trump) to fight to protect us from this gross exploitation. How’s the saying go, “we have met the enemy and it is us?” The results will be a bloody mess and a wholesale slaughter of worker welfare and income, and political and most particularly economic democracy.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s