Home > Uncategorized > Capital links. Nature, France and a Marxist DSGE model

Capital links. Nature, France and a Marxist DSGE model

1) What is capital? The national accounts define capital as a monetary variable. Many people however also talk about ‘natural capital’, ‘The stock of living and non-living components of the earth that provide a flow of valuable ecosystem goods or services‘. That’s from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, which has issued a very good report ‘The environmental accounts landscape‘. They may underestimate the extent to which laws and regulations shape ‘capital’. But here’s an interesting graph from the report:

capital2

2. And here a graph of economic capital in France. Note the preponderance of households, dwellings and land (mainly land underlying dwellings): capital is not what you think it is.

Capital

3. Imagine there’s no capital. And no debts, too. A farmer who makes plans – without taking regard of the stock of cattle or the land he owns or rents. That is what many (not all) neoclassical macro-models assume. It is fun when neoclassical economists introduce capital in the models: you get a class of capital owners (called ‘entrepreneurs’, but one might also call them: ‘capitalists’)  and a class of households who have nothing to sell but their labour… (sounds familiar), as in this ECB report. Also, from the Stackexchange site (where economists can pose questions to other economists, the answer is much longer and sophisticated than just this excerpt):

Question: In New Keynesian models, like the ones in Gali’s simple New Keynesian model or even Mankiw-Reis NK model on sticky information, capital is often not included. Now people do say that there are modeling difficulties and that’s why capital (K) is not included, but is there another justifiable reason other than modeling difficulties?

Answer: Capital is included in all the big estimated New Keynesian models (Smets-Wouters, Christiano-Eichenbaum-Evans), etc. But you’re absolutely right that the stylized core NK model does not have capital – which is hard to defend on empirical grounds, since capital investment is a very important part of business cycle fluctuations and the response to monetary policy. Ultimately, the reason does basically boil down to the “modeling difficulties” that you mention. First, there is an obvious way in which capital makes the NK model more complicated: at an absolute minimum, it introduces at least one additional backward-looking state variable. In contrast, the two core equations (the intertemporal Euler equation and New Keynesian Phillips curve) of the ordinary log-linearized NK model are completely forward-looking. Adding capital to the mix eliminates this nice analytical feature.

  1. July 27, 2016 at 7:43 pm

    What is missing is knowledge. The greatest asset we have is the knowledge of how to transform things into something we can use. Knowledge is worthless until it is used. This means it does not fit our accounting system. The more knowledge we use, the greater the value. Our accounting practices attempt to include knowledge by restricting its use with patents, trade secrets, and copyright. The value of know-how increases by treating Knowledge as a Commons.

    We need to change our accounting practices to include the Magic Pudding of knowledge. Balance Sheets cannot handle Magic Puddings. Maybe it is time to rethink double entry book-keeping and concentrate on Profit and Loss. Perhaps discard Balance Sheets as the controlling mechanism? If we do that then economics will look very different.

  2. David Chester
    July 29, 2016 at 9:25 am

    In response to the first question in the article, capital is not money, which only represents wealth. Capital is one of the three Smithian factors of production (along with land and labor). Without capital production does not occur, except possibly at a very low rate for personal use. Capital consists of two kinds of articles, mostly used in the production process. These are:

    1. Durable Capital Goods–the buildings, tools, machines, vehicles, etc., that are requires for making goods and providing services. This includes the infrastructure of the place where the community lives, and which is shared. Less directly our homes are a part of this durable capital too, since this form of it provides us with shelter, a place to store/consume necessities, to raise children and to rest between working sessions.

    2. Raw Materials and Partly Finished Goods. It includes both durables and consumables still in production or waiting to be sold.

    Capital does not include land, because land values were not the result of human labor. Land values are due to population density, its opportunity-capacity (potential ground-rent) and its ease of availability of access through the developed infrastructure.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s