U.S. real weekly wages, 1979-2016
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
RWER 26,369 subscribers
Regular Contributors
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Weekend Read - Stocks are up. Wages are down. What does it mean?
- U.S. billionaires profit from 10 months of pandemic
- A vaccine summit: Taking the pandemic seriously
- Reasoning in economics
- The “trickle down” assumption
- World map of COVID-19 deaths per capita by country
- More top-heavy than any other OECD country
- How economic orthodoxy protects its dominant position
- Reflections on the “Inside Job”
- 25 graphics showing upward redistribution of income and wealth in USA since 1979
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Ken Zimmerman on U.S. billionaires profit from 10 months of pandemic
- Ikonoclast on Weekend Read – Stocks are up. Wages are down. What does it mean?
- Edward Ross on A vaccine summit: Taking the pandemic seriously
- Ken Zimmerman on Weekend Read – Stocks are up. Wages are down. What does it mean?
- Ken Zimmerman on A vaccine summit: Taking the pandemic seriously
- Gerald Holtham on How economic orthodoxy protects its dominant position
- Gerald Holtham on Reasoning in economics
- Dave Marsay on Reasoning in economics
- Dave Marsay on Reasoning in economics
- Dave Marsay on Reasoning in economics
- pfeffertag on How economic orthodoxy protects its dominant position
- Lars Syll on Reasoning in economics
- Edward Ross on The “trickle down” assumption
- Craig on Weekend Read – Stocks are up. Wages are down. What does it mean?
- Ikonoclast on Weekend Read – Stocks are up. Wages are down. What does it mean?
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- Forthcoming WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
This is an interesting graph yet it is far more illustrative when it begins in 1970 or 1973.
This is my belief
The gradient of the curve would be more acute if the figures for the top 5% and 1% were plotted. Also important is the provision of public services which is a significant element in the standard of living for the bottom quintile. If the USA is anything like the UK there has been considerable funding removed in the last decade (and probably before) with consequential loss of value to users.
Curves showing some very basic living costs – energy, medical, child care, education might be usefully displayed alongside the bottom two near “flat-lines.”
Getting from these numbers to the “emotional charge” in the electorate in 2016, well, I’ve tried to make these connections. Savings for emergencies and retirement for the bottom 60% have been very hard hit.
But we all still believe in the American Dream, right? Candidates have to pledge fidelity to it. Mrs. Clinton wanted to make sure we could feel we could “get ahead” again.
When we “believe” in the American Dream, what is it we believe in? We can trace the answer to that question to James Truslow Adams, a popular historian of the 1930s. He wanted to write a popular history of the whole colorful pageant of the great epic which
is American history, but more than that he wanted to “discover” how America became what it became. That book was published in 1931 as “The Epic of America.” Adams had wanted to call the book “The American Dream” but was talked out of that by his publisher. Adams sets out the American Dream in the preface to the book. “…and, in especial, of that American dream of a better, richer, and happier life for all our citizens of every rank which is the greatest contribution we have as yet made to the thought and welfare of the world. That dream or hope has been present from the start. Ever since we became an independent nation, each generation has seen an uprising of the ordinary Americans to save that dream from the forces which appeared to be overwhelming and dispelling it. Possibly the greatest of these struggles lies just ahead of us at this present time – not a struggle of revolutionists against established order) but of the ordinary man to hold fast to those rights to ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’ which were vouchsafed to us in the past in vision and on parchment.” Adams took his cue from Henry David Thoreau in “Walden,” “I have learned this, at least, from my experiment: that if one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams, and endeavors to live the life he has imagined, he will meet with a success unexpected in common hours.” The American dream is an imagined dream. Historian after historian, journalist after journalist, commentator after commentator took up Adams’ “Dream” till it is as we see it today.