Distribution and redistribution of wealth in USA
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States#/media/File:If-us-land-mass-were-distributed-like-us-wealth.png
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States#/media/File:US_Wealth_Inequality_-_v2.png
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books

follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Externality-downplaying economics
- Weekend read - The cause of stagflation
- Reflections on the “Inside Job”
- Ecological reasoning demands perspectives that economics is designed to obliterate
- Weekend read - Is human probability intuition actually ‘biased’?
- Economic forecasting — why it matters and why it is so often wrong
- Hyman Minsky and the IS-LM obfuscation
- An age of crisis
- Debt, deficits, secular stagnation and the which way is up problem in economics
- USA National Debt Graph by President – Roosevelt to Obama
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Gerald Holtham on Economic forecasting — why it matters and why it is so often wrong
- Gerald Holtham on Ecological reasoning demands perspectives that economics is designed to obliterate
- Gerald Holtham on Weekend read – The cause of stagflation
- Gerald Holtham on Externality-downplaying economics
- Michael P Totten on Externality-downplaying economics
- Steven Klees on Externality-downplaying economics
- Ikonoclast on Ecological reasoning demands perspectives that economics is designed to obliterate
- Greg Daneke on Externality-downplaying economics
- Eric on Debt, deficits, secular stagnation and the which way is up problem in economics
- Charlie Thomas on Weekend read – The cause of stagflation
- rsm on Hyman Minsky and the IS-LM obfuscation
- yoshinorishiozawa on Hyman Minsky and the IS-LM obfuscation
- Gerald Holtham on Econometric testing
- Gerald Holtham on Hyman Minsky and the IS-LM obfuscation
- Gerald Holtham on Hyman Minsky and the IS-LM obfuscation
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
Here’s a question. Is the unit of productivity weighted to capital or labor? The reason it matters is that the formula output/input is generally expressed in monetary units. But, what if a closer inspection revealed that real wages have not remained parallel with the effort of labor? If so, then changes in output over an artificially deflated input would be confounded.
Has anyone done any work in this area showing a hidden redistribution of wealth? It is somewhat like surplus and profit, but not articulated in the framework of that productivity divisor or denominator.
Productivity is a distraction from the more important matter for most people. Productivity can go up with the implementation of robotics or AI – but why should the worker on the line be paid anymore than he was before the robot came along. In the 50’s workers used to claim any productivity gains should be matched with higher pay to the worker. This is the typical labor union position on productivity. The Union’s focus on productivity gains was some sort of counterweight to capital investment on robotics.
Corporations loved the distraction as it avoided the discussion on profits.
Suppose productivity stayed the same but profits went up 30% – should the workers receive profit sharing bonuses or simply the same paycheck as the year before. I would argue that Total Real Median Income should track GDP. As the economy grows – all boats should float. Productivity is too easy to manipulate – to your question productivity per dollar paid or productivity per hour of work? Output in units or output in dollars sold? I would also argue that all labor contracts should have a profit incentive bonus that parallels executive bonus payouts. If the CEO gets x% – same for the working crew.