Home > Uncategorized > Farhad Manjoo promotes billionaire ideology in proposal to get rid of billionaires

Farhad Manjoo promotes billionaire ideology in proposal to get rid of billionaires

from Dean Baker

New York Times columnist Farhad Manjoo tells us that he likes to “explore maximalist policy visions” in his columns. He falls well short of this goal in a piece calling for abolishing billionaires, which actually helps legitimate their existence.

The piece repeatedly tells us that their wealth is driven by technology, a point that first appears in the subhead which refers to “tech-driven inequality.” The problem with Manjoo’s piece is that the inequality is not in fact driven by technology, it is driven by our policy on technology, specifically patent and copyright monopolies. These forms of protection do not stem from the technology, they are policies created by a Congress which is disproportionately controlled by billionaires.

If the importance of these government granted monopolies is not clear, ask yourself how rich Bill Gates would be if any start-up computer manufacturer could produce millions of computers with Windows and other Microsoft software and not send the company a penny. The same story holds true with most other types of technology. The billionaires get rich from it, not because of the technology but because the government will arrest people who use it without the patent or copyright holder’s permission.

This point is central to the debate on the value of billionaires. If we could get the same or better technological progress without making some people ridiculously rich, then we certainly don’t need billionaires (I discuss alternatives in chapter 5 of my book Rigged [it’s free].) But in any discussion of the merits of billionaires, it is important to understand that they got their wealth because we wrote rules that allowed it. Their immense wealth was not a natural result of the development of technology.

It is unfortunate that this idea is apparently too radical for Manjoo.

  1. patrick newman
    February 9, 2019 at 12:01 pm

    The effort to reward ratio rapidly becomes massively out of proportion. Patents/copyright should be strictly time/condition limited. Entrepreneurs/innovators exit their creative burst in a fairly short time scale. In no time at all they become rentiers.

  2. EDWARD K ROSS
    February 9, 2019 at 8:36 pm

    This is the sort of information that any thinking member of the public can understand and relate it to their concerns with the present political economic system. Thus the question becomes how to present these sort of articles to the public. On this subject I would like to see Hardgrave heaps become involved because of his earlier comments on the subject in RWEA.
    Ted

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.