Global average temperature 1850 – 2018
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books

follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Chicago economics — nothing but pseudo-scientific cheating
- The big three’s CEOs are ripping off their companies
- What is heterodox economics?
- Keen, Roubini and Baker win Revere Award for Economics
- Rizzo goes for the guild
- There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- Rethinking public debt
- Re-thinking the Definition of “Public Goods”
- Comments on RWER issue no 107
- The difference between logic and science
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Ilcd on There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- FROMTINATOTARA on Rethinking public debt
- David Harold Chester on What is heterodox economics?
- David Harold Chester on Rethinking public debt
- metaecongary on What is heterodox economics?
- Dr Keith McNaughton on What is heterodox economics?
- FROMTINATOTARA on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rizzo goes for the guild
- David Harold Chester on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rethinking public debt
- John Hermann on The Chinese threat in critical minerals
- graziaiettogillies on Diverting class warfare into generational warfare
- ghholtham on Casino capitalism
- Meta Capitalism on Cochrane on PRICE-GOUGING
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)


























Who measured what temperatures where over that period? Meaningless data.
It’s a version of the data compiled by NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
It would be interesting to superimpose the build up of CO2 in the atmosphere over the same period. I suspect there will be a strong similarity between the two curves.
Of course. We have known for about 200 years that carbon-dioxide could produce a greenhouse effect and have been capable of accurately calculating the scale of the effect for over a century. We know that there is a causal link between concentration of carbon-dioxide partial pressure and the greenhouse effect. This is because carbon-dioxide is transparent to UK and visible light from the sun but absorbs infrared light emitted as heat from the earth’s surface.
There is of course a correlation between average surface temperature and greenhouse gases, however the relationship is interactive – replete with feedback mechanisms. That is, increased temperatures at the earth’s surface (including the oceans) will release more greenhouse gases to the atmosphere than would otherwise be the case. This is one complication that makes it difficult to make a definitive statement about a causal relationship.
Yes and that is positive feedback, a condition that is inherently unstable.
There is traceable, human-sourced CO2 causing oceanic acidification. 2014 Columbia University summary: https://phys.org/news/2014-11-global-human-caused-ocean-acidification.html
Did the editor upload this graph merely to stress the notion that disputes about political economics may whet the brain, but in effect are just as useful as the proverbal rearranging of deck chairs on the Titanic? I admit he does have a point.
More meaningless data…. I’d laugh out loud but it’s for real…
https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science-and-impacts/science/temperature-is-rising
Thanks Mike Ryan for linking to a description of the wide range of data supporting human-caused global warming – as in Ten Indicators of a Warming World.
Helge Nome and other sceptics – so a superficial assessment of one kind of data by a non-expert outweighs all the work of thousands of scientists?
Did you think they never thought of all the little excuses you come up with to avoid the uncomfortable conclusion?
A simple truth is that warming is proceeding pretty much as predicted thirty years ago, or perhaps a bit faster.
Let’s not forget the unpredictable effects of multiple interacting environmental feedback loops. In early 2005, before Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” I predicted unpredictably nonlinear acceleration of increasingly radical thermodynamic & hydrodynamic dysequilibria, globally.
My unheeded (and published) prediction was proven correct within 6 years, as accelerating glacial melting and movement exceeded all prior official predictions by nearly an order of magnitude.
Anyway, we should also consider the insanity of current crypto-coin mining & the illogic architecture & basic concepts. If alt.coin mining continues at the rate recently au current, analysts predict that it could raise the global average temperature by an extra 2*C (degrees Celsius). We should also remember that nearly 70% of us live within coastal disaster zones that will become much more dangerous much more rapidly than predicted.
Thus, I predict that global failure to embrace sane, truly appropriate emergency measures NOW will doom us to self-extinction and MELE much sooner than any current models predict.
Nick – I agree, 100%. If you haven’t read it yet, you may enjoy Ralph Metzner’s “Green Psychology” – wherein he points out that, as in the HMS Titanic, all us lower-class passengers (the losing class 99% of us) are locked into the lower decks, while the winning-class kleptocrats eat, drink, dance and play musical deck chairs as the Titanic ship of state goes down (and drags everything else along with it). Thus, Chomsky’s warnings about potential omnicide, though I think “ecocide” is more precise. After all, the real bottom of the food chain exists very deep in the Earth’s crust (seemingly solid rock) and around volcanic vent environments (without light, etc.) at the floor of the oceans and in their deepest depths.
However, unlike Metzner, I realize that the locks are illusory and that us 99%ers are the ones who keep us locked in and, possibly, doomed. It is no help to blame the winning-class for brainwashing us into am idiocracy disguised as hypnocracy masquerading as kleptocracy posing as plutocracy pretending to be republican democracy for a free world. It takes the vast majority of us to keep the game going as is.
Yet, changing the rules, the goal and the purpose of the world game is no more difficult than changing the rules, the goal and purpose of a card game, or changing the script and ending of an unfinished screenplay.
PS: As most well-informed observers know, methane release threatens much more lethal effects, nearly 22 times more potent than CO2. The CO2 level increase accelerates sequestered methane release that can accelerate at an unstoppably exponential rate.
Ho hum, right? Oh, well… Hi Ho!
The real answer lies in the absorption spectra of CO2 and methane and the emission spectra of the earth.
And please let us not forget the new “Silk Road” that is being built in Asia and who is financing it and against whom. And all the floods, and almost daily fires and climatic disasters that have engulfed the world and are now so commonplace that most people just turn a blind eye and walk by.
The denouement of Sapiens and most other forms of life on earth is near. Since 1900, over 500 species of animals have gone extinct. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution and capitalism 400 years-ago, more than 650 plant species and more than 480 animals have gone extinct. More are added to the endangered species list on a regular basis. Over 3000 animals and more than 2600 plants are currently considered endangered. Sapiens survived for over 200,000 years through imagination and creativity. And by being unable or choosing not to interfere too much in the nonhuman actions and events that sustain it. Today these seem to be failing Sapiens, as they lead to faulty understandings and no solutions to these problems. When Sapiens dies and takes most of the other life on earth with it, all the blame belongs to Sapiens, the now most powerful species on earth.