Home > Uncategorized > Cassandras whose counsel should no longer be ignored

Cassandras whose counsel should no longer be ignored

from John Benedetoo and RWER issue 93

In the 1980s and early 1990s, mainstream economists railed against heterodox economists and non-economist thinkers for questioning the appropriateness of “free trade” and for advocating national industrial policies. The debate was resolved, at least among the arbiters of acceptability, in favor of the mainstream economists. And yet, the heterodox arguments ring now like the unheeded warnings of prophets, while the mainstream economic view looks more and more debunked by reality.

The appearance of the United States as a unipower over 1990-2015 depended on policies that damaged the future of the United States and hurt a large segment of its population. It is likely that even during 1990-2015, the United States was never really a unipower. It was a very powerful Great Power that lived beyond its means, selling off the seed-corn of its past, in order to have the appearance of being far more powerful than it really was. Other nations engaged in a “rope-a-dope” strategy of staying out of the U.S. way, or appearing to fall into the ropes exhausted, while in reality building their strength.

The policy implications of such a conclusion should also be clear. Since the United States was never really a unipower, then it should certainly not be behaving like one now. Its policies should be to restore its own industrial economy and balance its trade, so that its own people’s living standards and infrastructure can again be world class. To do so, some alliances will need to go through deep and painful adjustments. Military bases in foreign countries may need to be shuttered and the troops relocated to U.S. soil. Diplomatic initiatives may need to be abandoned, and the United States may need to accept that some countries on the other side of the earth, that border each other, may wish to develop closer relationships with each other than they have with the United States, and do so on their own terms. And of course, the adjustment back to a balanced trade will present short-term adjustment pain for the U.S. economy.

There are many examples of nations past and present accepting the limits of their reach and thriving in the aftermath. Rome under Hadrian and Trajan slowed expansion and focused on internal infrastructure. It lasted another 300 years in the West. Similarly, many European nations with extensive colonies pulled back from those colonies after World War II. They recognized that they were no longer going to be able to hold other nations under thrall, and their own nations’ citizens benefitted greatly from ceasing to try to do so.

However, recognizing reality will require reexamining the belief that mainstream economists’ views on international trade are beyond question. Instead, the heterodox authors of several decades past were Cassandras whose counsel should no longer be ignored.  read more

  1. Greg
  2. Ken Zimmerman
    December 11, 2020 at 7:25 pm

    The answer to these questions depends on who is wanted to benefit, by how much, and for how long. Admitting that the US never was a unipower and racked up huge mistakes and liabilities when it pretended it was would mean shutting down financial markets while focusing on restoring its own industrial economy and balance its trade, so that its own people’s living standards and infrastructure can again be world class. Or, if not world class at least saved from total collapse. This will require deep and painful adjustments such as what you suggest. To military power projection, military aid and alliances to ‘enforce’ policies favorable to the USA, and USA may not be able to ‘punish’ those it considers ‘enemy’ states around the world. And certainly the diplomatic dominance of the USA will suffer great setbacks. And for the first time in its history the USA may be forced to support balanced trade and negotiations. No more international bullying. All of this will require widespread adjustments for many parts of America. But the one adjustment necessary to make all this work will not be allowed to happen. Those who oppose it are simply too powerful in the USA. This is the shut down or greatly reduced importance of America financial markets. The lure of easy money and the power of those who have lived ‘high on the hog’ from that money beginning in the 1980s and growing richer each year since simply do not care about the welfare of American workers, American industry, American infrastructure, or anything or anybody who interferes with their easy money from financial trading. They will scuttle any remedies proposed. Move to Singapore, Switzerland, Macao, etc. Continue to live the rich, easy life. While America sinks into despair and ruin.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.