Decolonization: a necessary first step
from Asad Zaman
This is part 3 of a talk on Current Economic Crisis in Pakistan and Solutions, from an Islamic Perspective. A summary of the first two parts is given below. This third part explains that colonization requires the assent of the colonized, which is achieved by an educational system which teaches the inherent superiority of the colonizers, and the inferiority of the colonized. To solve the problems created by colonial institutions meant for extraction of resources, we must first decolonize our minds. In this process, learning to see through economic theories which keep us dependent is a necessary first step. Read more
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books

follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Irrational Exuberance — Robert Shiller’s modern classic
- India’s central bank launches new campaign against cash
- In Thrall to the Infallible Hand
- Economic methodology — Lawson, Mäki, and Syll
- The Religion of Economics
- Comments on rwer issue no 93
- CO2 since the start of the Industrial Revolution
- The Keynes-Tinbergen debate on econometrics
- We can do better with a thousand years
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Ikonoclast on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Asad Zaman on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- George H. Blackford on Economic methodology — Lawson, Mäki, and Syll
- Ikonoclast on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Ikonoclast on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Steven Klees on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Asad Zaman on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Ikonoclast on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Asad Zaman on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Gerald Holtham on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Steven Klees on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Gerald Holtham on Why Krugman and Stiglitz are no real alternatives to mainstream economics
- Gerald Holtham on Economic methodology — Lawson, Mäki, and Syll
- Meta Capitalism on The Religion of Economics
- Meta Capitalism on In Thrall to the Infallible Hand
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
I wrote The End Of The Prractical Man, 1984, which Alfred D Chandler. Jr brought to the attention of he Englishih sspekking world through his extensive networking. You seem to be ignorantt of these events. Your story is old hat. It is German Busibess Ecoomics BWL that you ignore, the most important major in German academia.
I am indeed ignorant of your work about the End of Practical Man. But I suspect that you are not clear on the meaning of “decolonization”. This involves rejecting Eurocentric thought, and building on our own indigenous intellectual traditions. In fact, Eurocentric thought denies the possibility of such traditions because it holds that only Europeans are capable of rational thought. This was affirmed by Kant and by Weber, both Godfathers of German thought. Sandew Hira in his recent book on Decolonizing The Mind provides an excellent introduction to the non-Eurocentric intellectual traditions which we must build upon, to avoid the racism inherent in Eurocentric worldviews.
German BWL had widespread influence, in Turkey, in Japan, for example, as wellas in the Spanish Speaking world. What you call your own own intellectual tradiions are us and british and a product of anglosaxonia. Open your mind to alternative international traditions.
The deep Eurocentrism of this comment is mind-boggling! Only the white man has the capability of intellect. The rest can only imitate. Learn some history.
Japan. In order to modernize, Japan borrowed extensively from Europe, but they did it the Japanese way. it was Europeanization through Japanization.
Many non-“european” economists have made first-class contributions to economics. Amartya Sen is universally respected. Arthur Lewis and Abhijit Banerjee also won Nobel prizes. Bhagwati, Dixit, Morishima and others too numerous to mention have all contributed to the literature . I do not know whether they are guilty of not “decolonizing their minds” but evidently race has got nothing to do with it.
“I do not know whether they are guilty of not “decolonizing their minds” but evidently race has got nothing to do with it.” Thanks for that comment, Gerry! As Ghanaian political philosopher Ato Sekyi-Otu writes in his Left Universalism: “Race obstructs our perceptual horizon, distracts us from attending to other, foundational questions of human being and social existence, so we should move on to those other questions, questions we would still have to address were the domination of racist culture as a world system ever to come to its long overdue end.”