Home > Political Economy > Is there hope?

Is there hope?

from Peter Radford

I suppose we should start to ask the obvious questions.

I read a couple of days ago an analyst arguing that the world should move on and begin to make more concrete plans for a post-America era. One main part of his argument was that the American political system is now so outdated and defunct that it can no longer make sensible long term decisions. It seems the US is stuck in what I call post-illusion denial. Most everything it has done over the last thirty years turns out to have been an error. The after effects of the Cold War left America with no plan B of how to behave. Its politics were ill equipped to deal with the more modern problems of serious economic competition and commodity constraints on its life style – by which I mean higher priced oil. When faced with a challenge, the response was to huff and puff about American “exceptionalism” and to pout. Worse: American style economic doctrine, so deeply flawed as it was to turn out to be, was foisted on others.

The error, or course, was to revert to happy face politics. That was what Reagan sold the country on back in 1980. The happy face was plastered everywhere in order to avoid confrontation with fundamental issues. The idea, such as it was, being that free market magic would solve any ills. All we had to do was get government out of the way and things would work out.

What actually happened is that we used debt to paper over the fact that real growth was insufficient. We never paid for the wars we engaged in. We never paid to renew our infrastructure. We allowed our factories to decay. We cut taxes, but not costs. We pumped money into fantasy assets in any number of get rich quick schemes – the result being the succession of destructive bubbles we have lived through. Our policy leadership drifted into a zombie like self congratulatory dream world where it genuinely thought it had conquered history. Business cycle history that is. The magic worked we were all told. As recently as 2004 and 2005 top officials were slapping themselves on the back for having solved the problems of infinite growth.

Economics became a Disney like cartoon of itself. It became disconnected from the serious goal of solving problems for the benefit of all. It simply served to justify the aggrandizement of a few. It constructed utopias and imaginary worlds to explore. This was because it gave up on the more messy problems encountered here on earth. Prizes were awarded on the basis of magic and sleight of hand.

When your intellectuals leave the real world to inhabit a parallel universe and convince themselves that’s fine, no one can blame everyday folk for believing in the market magic fairy as well.

Someday someone will write a great satirical commentary on just how stupid all our clever people were. Right now all we can do is turn away in disgust. But how do you tell a whole cohort of highly educated and self satisfied people that they wasted their own and our time? Or that they led us into a dead end that will cost a generation of hard work to recover from?

Those leaders – should we even dignify them with that name any longer? – fell into a trance. They were beguiled by the great illusion that they could construct something solid on the shifting sands of finance. More importantly they totally ignored the corrosive effect of the debt being piled up in our private sector as households desperately sought to maintain a rising standard of living in the face of very mediocre income growth. These were great times if you were highly educated and well connected. Your income soared. Your wealth accumulated. For the rest? Not so much. The middle class festered in an ever increasingly vain effort to replicate the golden years of the immediate post-war era.

The disconnect between productivity and wages has come home to roost. It was severed by corporate incompetence and short sightedness: the pursuit of shareholder value came at the cost of undermining the demand that drives stock prices and real value over the longer term.

Now we learn the hard way.

Private sector debt is still far too high to allow much long term growth. It will have to be reduced. It is our Great Constraint.

We did not cure our banking system. We are still infested with badly mismanaged banks lurching about the landscape capable destroying value and sinking our economy at any moment. We held back from punishing poor investment decisions by creditors. We bailed them out. So the debt remains instead of having been written off.

We persist in discussing problems that don’t exist – debt and inflation – rather than ones that do – unemployment.

The irony is that we lectured the Japanese on exactly these topics when they drifted off course decades ago. Take your medicine, we said. Close those banks. Slash you debt. Rebuild from a realistic, and smaller base. Clean up. Face reality.

Did we?

Are we?

Is there any hope we will?

And our leading Republican candidate for the presidency, Mitt Romney, today announces that we are “inches away from abandoning capitalism”.

Huh?

It was unfettered capitalism that drove this illusion. It was deregulation that allowed the banks to upend the economy. It was the unleashing of markets that drove bubble manias. It was capitalists, not workers, who gouged shareholders for enormous and undeserved bonuses. It was market driven finance that misallocated capital into real estate and away from factories. It was a belief in market magic that created the illusion we could borrow and not tax to pay our bills. Indeed it was that part of our leadership – that word again – who most profoundly sought to re-engineer society in the grand tradition of the neo-liberal thinkers like Hayek and his misguided or ill-informed followers, who led us furthest astray.

Institutions matter in actual economies. They matter mightily. Like the banks of our great rivers, they bind capitalism into a channel where we can extract value from it without falling prey to its anti-social extremism. We get the work. We get the energy. But we avoid most of the mayhem. When those institutions are kicked away, when the river banks are breached, the system wobbles off course. Strange and very nasty things happen. Ordinary people drown. In particular, democratic society is torn apart. Political cliques dominate over the majority. The agenda narrows to serve a few. Unrest builds. Until …

With our elite now indulging in a self-referential discussion about problems that exist only within its small and exclusive world. With the recovery clearly showing signs of slowing down. With debt burdens forcing household retrenchment. And with unsafe banking ready to undermine everything. I have to ask:

Is there hope?

I, for one, wonder.

  1. Alice
    June 3, 2011 at 10:17 am

    Peter says ” The idea, such as it was, being that free market magic would solve any ills. All we had to do was get government out of the way and things would work out.”

    Yes this was the ethos. Government was seen as the problem by a man called Greenspan under the influence of a woman called Rand who happened to be standing right next to Greenspan when he got his first appointment in the Ford administration… and these two egotists (or one working for the other) proceed to dismantle governmental controls on everything they possibly could in the name of free markets. We need to all stop, stop buying the line, stop listening to egotistical experts with a pretty picture, a pretty model of how ther new world will work…especially when in the US we see nothing right now but an economy on its knees, brought down by these very policies of market freedoms.

  2. Alice
    June 3, 2011 at 10:50 am

    Peter says “The magic worked we were all told. As recently as 2004 and 2005 top officials were slapping themselves on the back for having solved the problems of infinite growth.”

    Greenspan solved the business cycle and Bernanke bought the line. Together they had moderated the “the business cycle”.
    Lets take a trip back to 1928 and 1929 when policy economists were patting themselves on the back for the same reasons and with the same sense of self congratulation. Its there in history. Same sort of self contragulations in the middle of a huge bubble they couldnt even see. The bubble of blindness.

    History repeats. Fools and foolish statements live forever.

  3. Georg R. Baumann
    June 3, 2011 at 1:32 pm

    I there hope?

    There is always hope, to me the point is that currently there are not enough people around expressing their hopes in a concise way, loud and clear!

    Hypothetically, say a device would be possible that enables each household to generate more than enough electricity that they require and the cost to building this device would be around $1000 in mass production, the device would be available worldwide, it would not contribute to CO2 emissions, and would be small enough to fit in a corner of a Garage. Bigger devices would be available as well, capable to serve entire blocks, and so on… You guessed it, the controversial and disputable Rossi reactor is on my mind, and to be clear, I do not believe it unless it is published in one of the respected journals. But for the same of an argument, say it would work…

    What do you think would happen?

    When Bolivia’s Morales announced in April that he establishes a ministry of mother earth and committed to communities the authority to monitor and control the industries and businesses that are polluting the environment, he did exactly that, he expressed hope and common sense, and acted upon this common sense.

    There is no need to let this situation escalate to the point of no return where brute force and chaos would take over, if from the 99% of people who do not belong to the Insider club of parasite economies only 10% would start to stand up and state demands to those elected or empowered, their voice would make a difference, and perhaps more people would join in then as well.

    We saw such things in germany recently with the Stuttgart 21 Demonstrations, while the trigger was a megalomaniac Government building project, the demonstrators expressed many more points of dissatisfaction with a disconnected and self serving government, the spectrum of people who went there every day for many weeks was really astonishing.

    Such expressions of hope are required urgently, because one thing is for certain, time is of the essence, the other side of the developments, the fascist movements that are going from strengths to strengths not only in Europe, are on a collecting spree, catching scared souls as new members, and this really worries me.

    Best wishes
    Georg

  4. June 3, 2011 at 3:36 pm

    The price of freedom is never ending vigilance. Those who want power will forever try, and will succeed as soon as you ease off. Just like weeds in the garden.

  5. June 3, 2011 at 4:58 pm

    Just to tout my current campaign:

    It should not be called the “business cycle.” It’s the financial cycle.

    Words matter. Spread the word.

  6. Alice
    June 5, 2011 at 10:16 am

    Helge and Steve R. Too true. The financial cycle is what is decimating the US and like weeds, those who once wanted to control finance now want to control entire governments and their political activities. The Financial sector (and the rights of the financials sector) have been placed on such a pedestal by government in the Us yet the dominance of this sector is bleeding the real producing sector dry. This can only end in more misery, even for the financial sector, who thought (and still presume) themselves impervious to the activities and buying habbits of ordinary people.

  7. Ron Goldring
    June 8, 2011 at 9:01 am

    Inequality Cycles:
    There is a financial cycle. It is never symmetrical: It grows slowly and then crashes abruptly, with a huge crisis. The pattern of “rich getting richer and poor getting poorer” has been observed for centuries. It appears unavoidable without government intervention. How long can this pattern proceed? In a finite world something gets exhausted at some point: In some cases the suckers run out for the Ponzi scheme. In other cases people take to the streets and revolution erupts. In some cases it’s a fascist regime that takes over and starts a war. This is what happens when governments fail to address these processes.
    You can clearly see this pattern in long series of Gini indices, or other inequality indices. Gini indices grow steadily. They never make a u-turn and start decreasing without government action, often after a great upheaval such as a war or major crisis sending the government to do something about inequality.
    Most Economics curricula pay very little attention to questions of inequality. Macro Economics is about “aggregates”, completely hiding distribution. Much talk is about “growth”, nearly nil about “inclusive growth” or “pro-poor growth”.

    The cycles are long. Long enough for most people to be totally oblivious to previous cycles. Long enough for Economics departments to ignore them. “Equilibria” reign supreme while long term processes are left alone to manage somehow.

    Isn’t all this trivial to understand? I believe it is, but trenched interests hide these insight deep. It is an extremely rare event that someone understanding this insight and willing to act upon it gets to power.

  8. June 9, 2011 at 5:38 am

    Capitalism can’t work without a global hegemon, this is the foundation for understanding modern political science. If the US can’t sustain global hegemony then the entire structure collapses.

    There really isn’t any country internationally that can challenge the US. , however the demands of empire are rotting the country from within. Internal collapse will come first, and it will come.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.