Home > The Economy > Doggie paddle economy

Doggie paddle economy

from Peter Radford

Remember the doggie paddle? That’s what the economy’s doing. Lots of effort. Lots of splashing about. Even more huffing and puffing. All to little or no avail. We’re going nowhere. And we’re not going there very quickly.

On Tuesday we learned from the Institute for Supply Management that the manufacturing sector has lost momentum. Less than half of our factories are reporting growing business. The ISM index slipped very slightly to 49.6% in August from july’s 46.8%. That decline is meaningless, but that fact that both months saw readings below 50% is not. Obviously manufacturing is not as robust as it was earlier in the year. The combination of Europe’s continuing woes, and our own tepid growth more than explains why factories are not expecting more business. Still there is no sign of a collapse, so we can add this news to the steady trickle of mediocrity that is now all too familiar. 

A little more surprising was Tuesday’s news of a 0.9% drop in construction spending in July. The biggest decline was in private residential construction, which fell at an annual rate of 1.6%. The unusually warm weather appears to have distorted the year’s activity and allowed more construction earlier. This phenomenon, when combined with a seasonal adjustment unable to compensate for it, is the most likely cause of the drop. As ever, we need to wait for a few months to determine whether there is a real downward shift taking place or whether this is simply an oddity of statistics.

So the week started off on a weaker note.

Then, however, things perked up somewhat.

The monthly report from ADP, the private payroll processor, gave better news for employment. According to ADP private payrolls rose 201,000 last month, up from 173,000 in July. This gave brief hope that today’s government employment report would beat expectations and would break the recent trend of utter mediocrity.

It didn’t.

If anything it merely confirmed what we all know: we are mired deeply in a terrible mess with no momentum at all.

This, of course, surprises no one. Well not us at least. In an economy struggling to shed debt, slowed by miserly pay increases – if any, burdened by ongoing retrenchment by state governments, and with a gridlocked and viciously partisan political environment, of course we aren’t going anywhere.

There are some who blame the uncertainty supposedly propagated by a supposedly anti-business Obama administration. That is preposterous. Businesses are not investing not because of red tape or excessive regulation. Nor because of the prospect of higher taxes. They are not investing because they see, correctly, that there is no demand. Without people buying stuff only the insane invest to make more of it.

Now, as you all know, I happen to think the lack of demand is the logical result of policy error combined with the long term corporate self-defeating obsession on shareholder value. These two tragic mistakes have created a perfect storm to swamp the middle class and put and end to most of what we all thought was endless: namely the steady march towards greater prosperity for the vast majority of Americans. Indeed those two mistakes have started a dangerous and potentially devastating reversal. By gutting the current and prospective purchasing power of that vast majority, and by redistributing our gain in wealth upwards to an ever more exclusive minority, those policies and corporate obsessions have undermined the very engine they hoped to build.

If you don’t pay your workers enough to buy the stuff you make eventually you sell less. The downward spiral is your doing. It is unreasonable, indeed it is stupid, to expect households to continue to consume by taking on more and more debt. At some point the reliance on ponzi finance topples the entire system into the abyss. This is eminently predictable. It is simple to understand. It is clearly our misfortune – or our own error – to have fallen for the snake oil embodied in those policies and obsessions.

Deregulation, the unbridled pursuit of shareholder value, and the consequent redistribution of wealth upwards starves the economy, eventually, of its lifeblood. Especially when those who benefit, the upper echelon of our society, have no allegiance to the society they are exploiting. When they can shovel their gains abroad they starve the economy of investment. When they skew the tax code in their own favor, they starve the government of revenues. When they cut costs to beef up profits they reduce the purchasing power of their own communities. When they shift jobs abroad to lower costs they increase profit but undermine their homeland. And when they start to feel the rot of their actions, they spend to influence the government that enables and encourages those actions.

Continuous and excessive deregulation coupled with a corporate culture dominated by the pursuit of profit at all costs is the basic cause of our malaise. And we cannot break out until we reverse course.

In that context the upcoming election could not present a more stark contrast.

The Republicans want to deepen and extend the trends that caused the problem. The Democrats want, at least in part, to undo them. The outcome remains in doubt because of economic news like today’s. The stupor and continuous tepid response are alarming. They allow extreme notions and ideas to fester. And they encourage a cynical disregard for balanced thought.

Given our political climate I doubt this election will resolve much. This will hearten the extremists and those who harbor utopian visions. The rest will suffer as the extremes batter each other with competing and utterly unreal solutions.

As for economics: it will continue its slide into irrelevance as it either offers up its own utopias or it recycles old ideas that no longer fit well with economic reality. The paucity of new, truly new, ideas will ensure it withers. Perhaps it deserves to. After all the doggie paddle economy is built on the sands of orthodox economics with its call for deregulation, more open markets, and its underpinning of the paraphernalia of modern finance. Utopias don’t exist anywhere, least of all in our real world. Too bad that’s all orthodox economics talks about.

Paddle away folks. It’s a long way to shore.

  1. September 7, 2012 at 6:24 pm

    Peter says : “If you don’t pay your workers enough to buy the stuff you make eventually you sell less. The downward spiral is your doing. It is unreasonable, indeed it is stupid, to expect households to continue to consume by taking on more and more debt.”

    The problem is Peter when Obama reduced the payroll tax on workers — the equivalent of approximately a 3 per cent wage increase for almost all American workers, most workers did not spend this additional after tax income on domestically produced goods.

    To the extend they bougth additional goods [rather than pay down outstanding consumer debt] , most of that money was spent at Walmart and other retailers to buy goods produced in China and other low wage countries — thereby increasing demand and perhaps jobs in these countries rather than the USA.

    The tax multiplier of the textbooks is really applicable to a closed economy — and basically irrelevant in the global economy as it stands.

    What we need, in order to increase demand by the private sector for domestically produced goods significantly (and also expand exports) is a 21st century version of the “Keynes Plan” which Keynes presented at Bretton Woods. The plan was defeated by the US delegation headed by Harry Dexter White.

    In the last 20 or so years I have been arguing for a version of Keynes’s Plan that I have developed called the IMCU –the International Monetary Clearing Union. This plan can easily be seen in my THE KETNES SOLUTION; THE PATH TO GLOBAL ECONOMIC PROSPERITY book. It is a win-win plan where both the low wage countries and the high wage countries such as the USA will experience growth in the demand for their domestically produced goods! This Clearing Union was Keynes’s generalization of the policy for resolving problems of a lack of effective domestic demand in a global open economt context.

    Those who defend outsourcing as part of the law of comparative advantage where the uSA will replace blue collar jobs with high wage high tech jobs (e.g., Mankiew) — just do not know what they are talking about even if they proclaim themselves to be New Keynesians!

    For Keynes explictly recognized that the law of comparative advantage was ONLY applicable to natural resources and climate affected industries (e.g., agriculture).

    All this I have been arguing and writing about in great detail for years — but even heterodox economistssuch as readers of this blog have failed to get behhind a single Post Keynesian program based on the principles Keynes laid down in the GT for an entrepreneurial economy that used money contracts (not real contracts) to organize al market oriented production and exchange transactions.

    What do I have to do to organize readers to at least look at the KEYNES SOLUTION in discussing the economic problems of our tiome?

  2. Nell
    September 9, 2012 at 10:47 am

    It would help if you explained (or linked to an explanation) of your central idea, rather than defaulting to ‘read my book’, which means buy my book. Constant plugging of ‘my book’ by posters on this blog site is off putting. Keen on the other hand made his ideas freely available to read on his blog – and this encouraged people, like me, to buy his book. No doubt as a contributor to this blog there is older material here that would interest me. I am now going to do a search. However, if you want more people to listen then link more. Or perhaps I am getting the wrong end of the stick and you are not talking to lay people but others in your profession? If so, my apologies.

  3. September 9, 2012 at 3:02 pm

    sorry but the understanding of how an entrepreniurial economy that uses money contracts to organize all market production and exchange transactions can not be summarize in a “tweet” — or even a few paragraphs of a comment.

    The IMCU plan version of the Keynes Plan requires a whole chapter to see all its provisos and ramifications — and then another chapter to explain why the mainstream argument for leaving international trade and money transactions to the free market can be disasterous — and why in the 21 century (as Keynes noted in rhe 1920s) the law of comparative advantage is applicable only to natural resouces and climate affected industries. In these days of industrialization and hi tech industries, free trade patterns will encourage production in any country that permits sweat shops, child labor, no health and safety conditions for workers, no employee provided health insurance, etc — all conditions that we in the USA and other developed nations believe are the characteristics of an uncivilized economy. [Whoops! sorry but this is an off-the -cuff plug for the book I co-authored with my son etitled ECONOMICS FOR A CIVILIZED SOCIETY]

    After all I said read my book — not necessarily buy it. You can take it out of your local library–or you can go to my home page and read the more than 20 published articles that are listed there to be downloaded.

    Paul Davidson

  4. charlie thomas
    September 9, 2012 at 3:28 pm

    for the past year i have been traveling I-10 between LA and Phx. The last time truck traffic was up by 100% both going to CA and coming back. What is going on? Is shipping out of sync with the economy’s trajectory? Or is there a suppression of the economic activity. or is the traffic irrelevant?

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.