Devil’s dung
from David Ruccio
Pope Francis’s recent references to money as the “dung of the devil” (or, alternatively, the “devil’s dung“) brought to mind lots of different references (from the etymology of dung in terms of different classes of workers to Freud’s tale of the devil whose gifts of money turn to excrement upon his leaving).
But, at the suggestion of a friend [ht: ja], I also began to imagine how we might retitle basic economics courses in a Catholic university. Consider the following:
Econ 101—Mephistopheles’ Market Manure
Econ 102:—Satanic Sewers of National Economies
or just get right to the point,
all intro-level courses—Beezelbub’s Bourgeois Bullshit
Any other suggestions?
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Real-world economists take note!
- Keynes and the casino
- The non-existence of economic laws
- Water Flowing Upwards: Net financial flows from developing countries
- USA: The Great Prosperity / The Great Regression : 5 charts
- Comments on RWER issue no 92
- Reflections on the “Inside Job”
- “If poor people knew how rich rich people are, there would be riots in the streets”
- Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- The current state of game theory
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Patrick Newman on Real-world economists take note!
- deshoebox on Real-world economists take note!
- felipefrs on The non-existence of economic laws
- Seeker on The non-existence of economic laws
- Hepion on Water Flowing Upwards: Net financial flows from developing countries
- yoshinorishiozawa on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- Jan Wiklund on The non-existence of economic laws
- yoshinorishiozawa on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- ghholtham on The current state of game theory
- ghholtham on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- ghholtham on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- yoshinorishiozawa on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- energyasnumeraire on The non-existence of economic laws
- yoshinorishiozawa on The non-existence of economic laws
- Guy Dauncey on The non-existence of economic laws
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-
Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan
————— Herman Daly —————-
————— Asad Zaman —————
—————– C. T. Kurien —————
————— Robert Locke —————-
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
Considering previous statements I think that the Pope refers to the monetary policy. If this is the case the contribution to a new syllabus seems to make the point.
I really liked the third suggestion for all intro classes. So for us economists here some ways in which we should rename our profession:
Excrementologists
Bullshit Artists
Evil doers
Devil’s advocates
Dung experts
Environmental economists, could also be re labelled as excrement recyclers
:)