Home > Uncategorized > Greece: keep the Euro add the Geuro

Greece: keep the Euro add the Geuro

from Claude Hillinger

The Syriza party under Alexis Tsipras won the Greek election on a promise to end austerity. Negotiations between the new Greek government and the European Union have at this writing not yet begun. It is clear that whatever the outcome of the negotiations, the EU will at most finance a tiny fraction of all the expenditure programs that Syriza has planned and is already implementing: Re-hiring government employees, raising the minimum wage, stopping many privatization projects, and other measures. Equally evident is the fact that under present conditions, the Greek government does not have sufficient own resources to finance what it has planned. To think that the programs can be paid for by taxing the Greek Oligarchs is fantasy. So what can be done?

I have a proposal: There are according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_currency about 2500 local currencies in existence throughout the world. Their purpose is always the same—to create additional demand in a depressed economy. In this they have some success, as evidenced by their popularity. The success is however limited. They are local initiatives that create some additional demand for local small businesses and some additional employment, mainly in the service sector. They cannot accomplish more because they do not enable payments at regional or national levels; they do not involve a banking system for making payments or issuing loans; they cannot finance any of the large transactions on which a modern economy depends. But, is it not possible to take the basic idea from the local to the national level, keep the basic feature of increasing demand while eliminating the shortcomings of merely local currencies. I believe that it is not only possible, but highly desirable, specifically in the case of Greece, but also for other countries of the Euro area, that by design have lost control over their money supply.

Here is my proposal: The Greek government should create a second currency to be named the GEURO. The Geuro would be legal tender with the same value as the Euro, but for domestic payments only. Any payment, in the private sector, or to the government, for example for taxes or fees, could be made equally in Euros, Geuros, or any combination of the two.

The government would start to make all payments, for wages, transfers, etc. with a combination of the two currencies. For example, they could set a ratio of 80% Euro, 20% Geuro.Without any further aid from the EU, the Greek government could increase its spending in this example by 20%.

The government should mandate banks to open a Geuro account parallel to every Euro account so that the Geuro could be freely used in payments through the banking system. There would however be no obligation for a bank to exchange Geuros for Euros. Also, banks would be prohibited from making loans in Geuro, so that there would be no additional instability introduced because of possibly nonperforming Geuro loans.

Under my proposal, the Greek government could quickly and very substantially increase domestic demand, which was its principal campaign promise and it could do so without the need for agreement on the part of some external authority.

I can see further long term benefits from such a system, not only for Greece, but for all countries of the Euro zone. The introduction of the Euro was a mistake, but abandoning it now would be very costly both in real and psychological terms. Under my proposal, the Euro could be maintained, while giving to the individual countries the possibility of a flexible anticyclical fiscal policy, a possibility that they now lack.

For Greece there would be still another advantage: Should negotiations with the EU at some point fail, then an independent Greek currency would already be in existence and would not have to be created under crisis conditions. Having to fear the Grexit less, Greece would gain some bargaining power in the negotiations.

  1. January 29, 2015 at 2:52 pm

    Brilliant. Britain maintained a dual-note system, with unlimited Treasury notes circulating alongside Bank of England notes between 1914 and 1928. Not quite the same as the proposal, but similar in that the Treasury note issue allowed a large increase of money supply in defiance of existing legislation. Needs to be communicated to Varoufakis. He will appreciate it, if he hasn’t thought of it already.

    • Claude Hillinger
      January 29, 2015 at 5:24 pm

      Thank you for this very interesting and relevant information. Without knowing details, it is clear that the episode you describe is based on essentially the same idea. It would be very valuable to know how it worked out. If it served its purpose, that would be a strong argument for trying a similar idea again. Do you have any reference where this episode is described?

      • January 29, 2015 at 6:12 pm

        It originated during the August 1914 crisis as a way of suspending the Gold Standard, since the Treasury notes (unlike Banknotes) were not redeemable in gold. So quite similar to the Euro conundurm in Greece today. It comes up in every account of British monetary history of the period. Before commenting, I checked in Glyn Davies, A History of Money ((1994), where it is described briefly on pp. 369, 374-5. Will check out one or two more items this evening. It was too successful, and prevented Lord Cunliffe and his successor Montagu Norman, Governors of the Bank of England, of pressing austerity as hard as they wanted. The attempts to get rid of it are mentioned repeatedly in Boyle’s biography of Norman (1967). A book worth checking would be A. Feavearyear, *The Pound Sterling* (1963), which I don’t have. Also Sayers, *The Bank of England 1891-1944* (3 vols. 1976). I have a feeling that it is still awaiting a proper study.

  2. graccibros
    January 29, 2015 at 3:20 pm

    Everyone who wishes Greece well should be open minded. I believe this is the economic template, below, the “Modest Proposal,” that is going to be used. Have I missed the public airing of the ideas:

    MODEST PROPOSAL

    The document’s latest date is July of 2013. The authors are Yanis, James Galbraith and Stuart Holland.

    • Claude Hillinger
      January 29, 2015 at 7:07 pm

      You are referring to a proposal that can only be implemented by the European Union as a whole. Mine can e implemented by the Greek government alone.

      • January 29, 2015 at 8:07 pm

        Precisely!

        But do it as electronic money, mobile-phone-mediated, no bills and coins. Advantages list: http://www.itk.ntnu.no/ansatte/Andresen_Trond/econ/mobile-dollars.pdf

      • graccibros
        January 29, 2015 at 9:53 pm

        Understood Claude, I don’t disagree, except to say that the proposals by the three authors in the “Modest Proposal” for a New Deal type of public spending, all come from existing Euro Institutions, no new ones are needed. This is important tactically and legally – and it almost goes without saying, politically.

        When the Greek crisis first broke (I know, I know, when hasn’t Greece been in a crisis economically or politically)…about four or five years ago, I did some digging and research so that I understood the terrain better. In terms of jobs from green infrastructure, from your currency proposal or the bonds talked about in the paper, Greece has sun, wind and water in abundance, time to get off conventional fuels ASAP. Greece hasn’t done much in this area.

  3. January 29, 2015 at 5:53 pm

    I have been advocating this since 2010. See for instance this report, a collection of papers from a seminar in Berlin, July 2012, convened by (of all!) The German Association for Small and Medium-sized Businesses.

    My proposal is on page 14:

    Click to access sammelpublikation_parallelw%C3%A4hrung.pdf

    Most papers in German, mine and another in English. The whole purpose was to discuss the need for introducing national parallel currencies in eurozone crisis countries. The seminar resulted in an open letter signed by the participants and published in Handelsblatt :

    http://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/euro-krise-aufruf-fuer-eine-parallelwaehrung-im-wortlaut/6937954.html

    Among the signatories was Thomas Mayer, former chief economist at Deutsche bank. I believe he is the inventor of the term “geuro”.

  4. Herb Wiseman
    January 29, 2015 at 6:25 pm

    This proposal speaks to the whole issue of government created money versus bank created money. Part of the reason that Greece is in trouble is that banks get to create most of the money and governments use quantitative easing to support the private financial sector do do so. There is no reason why the same quantities of money created by the private banks could not be created by the government and it would not be inflationary. The private sector would have to have controls on it such as reserves but that is anathema to them which actually is how we got into this mess. The governments would spend the money on infrastructure providing jobs and a revenue stream from properly taxed workers and corporations.

  5. Marko
    January 29, 2015 at 6:46 pm

    I like it. I think they should do this post-haste , even if they intend and are allowed to stay within the Eurozone. But if negotiations go south and they decide to leave or are booted out , at least they’ll have currency , printing presses , etc. ready to roll as an independent state. It would be a devalued currency , to be sure , but better to have it in advance so they can focus on all the other problems they’d have once outside the EU.

  6. merijnknibbe
    January 29, 2015 at 7:06 pm

    Check Philip Pilkington on the MEFO bills and Hjalmar Schacht (NAZI Germany). Terrible succesful. http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/12/philip-pilkington-hjalmar-schacht-mefo-bills-restoration-german-economy-1933-1939.html

  7. January 31, 2015 at 10:45 am

    Marko says:

    “at least they’ll have currency , printing presses , etc. ready to roll as an independent state”.

    Agree. But why do this with physical currency? Yanis Varoufakis use the argument against a national currency that it takes 8 months to get it up and running. Then do it instead via the mobile network. And circumvent the private banking system by giving any person and firm an account directly at the national central bank. Some advantages listed here: http://www.itk.ntnu.no/ansatte/Andresen_Trond/econ/mobile-dollars.pdf

    • Claude Hillinger
      January 31, 2015 at 11:53 am

      It is difficult enough to introduce any single reform in society; it is not made easier by trying to introduce two unrelated reforms at the same time. So lets keep the issue of introducing a supplementary payment system separate from changing the technology involved. Regarding your proposal: 1) Security risks associated with smart phones are well known. 2) I am sure that in empowerished Greece many people don’t have a smart phone, 3) I also suppose that many rural Greek communities don’t even have a decent internet. Electronic payment systems are now being introduced in the most advanced economis. Once they are established there, they can diffuse.

      • January 31, 2015 at 12:44 pm

        “It is difficult enough to introduce any single reform in society; it is not made easier by trying to introduce two unrelated reforms at the same time. So lets keep the issue of introducing a supplementary payment system separate from changing the technology involved. ”

        It is much easier, cheaper and faster to get a mobile-phone mediated system up and running, than to establish a system for printing bills and making coins. Software and organisational solutions can easily be copied from other places where they are already implemented.

        Secondly, we both want a parallel currency system to the euro. there will be much less confusion when the parallel currency does not consist of notes and coin, like with the euro.

        Thirdly, electronic currency makes it much more difficult to evade taxes and do other types of economic crime.

      • Claude Hillinger
        January 31, 2015 at 3:21 pm

        I don’t know enough about electronic payment systems to know if it would conflict with my proposal. Could the governmentr easily pay wages and make all other payments with this system?

      • January 31, 2015 at 6:05 pm

        Claude: “I don’t know enough about electronic payment systems to know if it would conflict with my proposal. Could the governmentr easily pay wages and make all other payments with this system?”

        Yes. It only requires that recipients (employees, pensioners, providers) accept having a checking account at the central bank. Which could be free or cost next to nothing, since the CB doesn’t need to run any branches.

  8. January 31, 2015 at 12:27 pm

    1) “Securiy risks” are much less a problem than what you have with physical currency (theft, robbery).

    2) Mobile-mediated payments (“M-Pesa” in Swahili) have been in use in the poor countryside in Kenya since 2007, a resounding success. M-Pesa expanded into Mozambique, Lesotho, and Egypt in May, June, and July 2013, respectively. Mobile money is also spreading to India, Afghanistan, South Africa, Tanzania.

    On 1 december 2014 Ecuador became the first country in the world to circumvent the private banking system and offer anyone a mobile money account directly at the Central Bank. This country, less developed than Greece and with Andean mountains and deep valleys, has good coverage, 15 million inhabitants and 15 million mobile subscriptions.

    And the payment system does not require a smartphone. SMS capacity is sufficient.

    3) “I also suppose that many rural Greek communities don’t even have a decent internet.”
    But you don’t need the internet, this goes via the mobile phone network.

    “Electronic payment systems are now being introduced in the most advanced economies. Once they are established there, they can diffuse.”

    No, when it comes to using mobile phones, the situation and history is the opposite: Mobile money was introduced in developing countries to offer the population a solution for monetary exchange where there is far between and few bank branches and ATMs, and where opening and having a regular bank account is costly and inconvenient for the poor.

  9. Robert W. Parenteau
    February 22, 2015 at 11:58 pm

    Claude: Might have a stronger chance of getting this to fly without being immediately ruled out as a violation of treaty provision on legal tender etc, if you structured this as a tax anticipation note along the lines of one I sketched out in Athens in late 2013. Here is a more recent discussion of the TAN proposal, which also allows nations to exit austerity without exiting the euro. http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/02/robert-parenteau-get-tan-yanis-timely-alternative-financing-instrument-greece.html Best, Rob

    • February 24, 2015 at 8:15 am

      Rob: Thank you for your comment. I have become pretty pessimistic regarding the impact of discussions such as we are having on the minds of the political actors. Be that as it may. I am not familiar with the treaty provisions, but history of the EU shows that if one wants, one can always get around such provisions. Would Greece be thrown out of the Euro if they adopted the Drachma as second currency? I doubt it. If they did adopt the Drachma as second currency, it would strengthen their bargaining position more than the TAN proposal. Of course, either proposal is much better than doing neither!
      Claude

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.