How low can it go?
from David Ruccio
The United States is now more than eight years out from the end of the Great Recession and the one-side nature of the recovery is, or at least should be, clear for all to see.
Even as unemployment has dipped below the so-called “natural rate,” workers are far from recovering all they’ve last in the past decade.
According to the official data illustrated in the chart above, the labor share of national income remains just above the lowest level it reached in the entire postwar period. Using 100 in 2009 as the index value, the current labor share has fallen to 96.5—down from 110.24 in 2001 and 114 in 1960.
The question is, how low can the labor share go?
Update
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books

follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- The big three’s CEOs are ripping off their companies
- Chicago economics — nothing but pseudo-scientific cheating
- What is heterodox economics?
- Keen, Roubini and Baker win Revere Award for Economics
- Rizzo goes for the guild
- There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- The difference between logic and science
- The current state of game theory
- Is a US college degree worth it?
- Comments on RWER issue no 107
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Ilcd on There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- FROMTINATOTARA on Rethinking public debt
- David Harold Chester on What is heterodox economics?
- David Harold Chester on Rethinking public debt
- metaecongary on What is heterodox economics?
- Dr Keith McNaughton on What is heterodox economics?
- FROMTINATOTARA on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rizzo goes for the guild
- David Harold Chester on Rethinking public debt
- ghholtham on Rethinking public debt
- John Hermann on The Chinese threat in critical minerals
- graziaiettogillies on Diverting class warfare into generational warfare
- ghholtham on Casino capitalism
- Meta Capitalism on Cochrane on PRICE-GOUGING
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-

Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan

————— Herman Daly —————-

————— Asad Zaman —————

—————– C. T. Kurien —————

————— Robert Locke —————-

Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)



























And if you superimpose the 1%’s share ?
I’ve added the chart you’re looking for in an update to the original post.
Here’s the chart—with the labor share (in blue, measured on the left) and the top 1% share (in red, on the right):Sorry, it won’t let me post an image in the comments. I’ll try to find another way.
But here’s a link to the labor share, with bottom 50% and 90% shares: https://anticap.wordpress.com/2017/06/08/labors-declining-shares/
David
Unfortunately the NIPA data is accounting based and as the top billionaires command more capital they can sprint ahead in a Piketty way that is not measured here. If you drill down on the Forbes magazine website that is obsessed with and provides all sorts or information on top billionaires, there are tables of their wealth and even estimates of day to day changes. The stock market rally this week has make Larry Ellison at least one billion dollars richer, and when one divides that by the number of households in the US, it highlights the power mismatch.
All they’ve lost…?
1) The great economist John Maynard Keynes thought a 15-hour work week could be enough. He wrote in 1938 long before the Internet!2) In 2015, Anna Coote proposed reducing the work week to 30 hours. You can read an introduction to her book “Time on Our Side” on the Internet.