Home > Uncategorized > “Never have corporate profits outgrown employee compensation so clearly and for so long”

“Never have corporate profits outgrown employee compensation so clearly and for so long”

from David Ruccio

fredgraph (3)

Those aren’t my words. The quotation that forms the title of this post is from a recent Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louisblog post.

And they’re important to keep in mind in light of the news coverage (e.g., by the New York Times) of last week’s Labor Department report on hiring and unemployment. Yes, 250 thousand jobs were added in the U.S. economy last month and average earnings did rise by 0.2 percent and are up 3.1 percent over the past year. 

But. . .

fredgraph (1)

The rate of growth of American workers’ wages (the blue line in the chart above) is only a hair above the increase in consumer prices (the red line). So, for all intents and purposes, real wages remain stagnant.

fredgraph (4)

Meanwhile, the profits captured by American corporations continue to grow, reaching new record highs.

fredgraph (5)

It should come as no surprise, then, that the labor share of national income (the light blue line in the chart above) remains below its pre-crash level (and much lower than any earlier year in postwar history), while the share of national income that is distributed to wealthy households in the form of dividends (the light green line) is still much higher than it’s been throughout the postwar period.

Never have corporate profits and dividends outgrown workers’ wages so clearly and for so long. And the political party dominating all three branches of the U.S. government is doing everything in its power to make sure that trend continues.

That’s the proper context for the latest jobs report—and for tomorrow’s elections across America.

  1. Helen Sakho
    November 8, 2018 at 1:44 pm

    Indeed, worse is yet to come and to be exported.

  2. November 19, 2018 at 8:14 am

    “Never have corporate profits and dividends outgrown workers’ wages so clearly and for so long. And the political party dominating all three branches of the U.S. government is doing everything in its power to make sure that trend continues.”

    When the House of Plantagenet (longest reigning royal house in UK history) fell after a long decline, it was replaced by the House of Lancaster. This struggle was not just about who ruled the UK but who owned it. For by divine right the monarch owned all the lands, forests, lakes, etc. of the UK. The monarch dispersed these properties to loyal subordinates who served the monarch staunchly. This is the tradition in the UK which lasted till the 18th century. It explains why the monarch and her/his aristocracy is even today richer, better housed and fed, and more powerful in conflicts than the many thousands of others who inhabit the UK. My question, what is the tradition in the USA that allows those persons owning and corporations to obtain and keep wealth, well-being, and power beyond any possible for the many thousands of others who inhabit the USA? Why has the US Constitution been abandoned in adhering to these arrangements? And why has there not been a civil uprising to reverse these arrangements?

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.