The age of Doris Day…
Let’s not forget that she once played a union worker, in ‘The pajama game’. With the song ‘racing with the clock‘. Also, here a blogpost of mine about how in ‘The Age of Doris Day’ apt new institutions enabled everybody to work less and have better lives, in stead of a part of the population being entirely unemployed and miserable.
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- DSGE models — a total waste of time
- Lost opportunities?
- Weekend read - A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- USA: The Great Prosperity / The Great Regression : 5 charts
- The problem with electric vehicles
- “If poor people knew how rich rich people are, there would be riots in the streets”
- The current state of game theory
- The irrelevance of the Ramsey growth model
- Comments on RWER issue no. 89
- The Keynes-Tinbergen debate on econometrics
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- George H. Blackford on DSGE models — a total waste of time
- ghholtham on Lost opportunities?
- ghholtham on DSGE models — a total waste of time
- ghholtham on DSGE models — a total waste of time
- David Harold Chester on DSGE models — a total waste of time
- David Harold Chester on Lost opportunities?
- Taco Bottema on Lost opportunities?
- George H. Blackford on DSGE models — a total waste of time
- Stuart.Mac McBurney on Lost opportunities?
- ghholtham on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- David Harold Chester on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- David Harold Chester on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- sackergeoff on With a modest financial transactions tax, Jim Simons would not have been superrich
- CBASILOVECCHIO on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- David Harold Chester on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-
Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan
————— Herman Daly —————-
————— Asad Zaman —————
—————– C. T. Kurien —————
————— Robert Locke —————-
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
History explains how we lost that and arrived at the present that is why I think understanding history should help us to avoid repeating the same mistakes again. Ted
The good old days of Doris Day are sadly gone. What we have now the vast majority of humans doing an involuntary twist around the very rich and the powerful just to survive them.
We have NOT learned from history and that is the saddest fact of it all. Any history that newer generations might learn from is likely to be numbed by marking ploys and/or a quest for surviving the unprecedented levels of unemployment they are facing.
We seem to have forgotten much history, I agree. Even so, evolution is accelerating at an accelerating rate and financially burdening young graduates at the very moment they are jumping into life is oxymoronish and boorish.
Very true indeed.
“One of our worst problems is that too many of us are too easily bamboozled; and the worse & longer we’re bamboozled, the less we want to know about it.” – Carl Sagan
Sigh…
Unfortunately, Dr. Sagan failed to provide a cure, a whole-system solution for our ecocidal whole-system problem. Subsequently, the 2012 WEA conference on economics & ethics clearly failed to solve the problem, by integrating economics & ethics. I once again suggest that the failure is due to the chronic lack of interest in completing a unitive foundation of metatheory supporting valid meta-economics. Anyone care to discuss the issue?
Where might one learn more?
Look back through what I’ve been trying to say. I agree with Michael’s ordering of events: there is no unitive foundation of metatheory because of chronic lack of interest in it. But that, I suggest, is because of a chronic lack of understanding of the difference between fundamental and applied science, and consequently lack of language for expressing it.
Roughly, I’m pointing to the difference between mapping and modelling, suggesting fundamental [meta] theory tells you where to look, whereas applied theory tries to enable one to predict the effects of realising possibilities “on paper”. that being much less costly than trying them out in practice before one is fairly sure that one knows what one is doing.
Are you the Rob Reno that expressed an interest in my work before? If so, apologies for my cautious response. At that time you seemed to be echoing Ken Zimmerman.
One could wonder if the lack of interest in a metatheory, among everyday people–who coincidentally vote on that lack–is actually at the feet of journalists and media talkers. In the day of Doris Day, wire services provided naked news, and local journalists analyzed and interpreted it for their readers, those everyday people.
There was time, it seemed, for thinking. Maybe the computer uber-enabled the CFOs of every business to see redundancy where there was none, and substituted a wire service analysis that has become so easy to buy off. Think of whole cable networks that repeat a sort of party line.
It is only after metatheories are spoken in every day English, that maps onto life as experienced, that caring could begin.