Home > Uncategorized > India’s central bank launches new campaign against cash

India’s central bank launches new campaign against cash

from Norbert Häring

India’s central bank will withdraw the largest banknote from circulation. The then largest note is only worth about as much as the smallest in the euro area. The move is intended to force people to use electronic money instead of cash. With this, they can be better monitored and controlled and the financial and IT industries get their percentages and data with every purchase. India, as a favorite guinea pig of the global cash abolitionists, often provides the blueprint for what is in store for us.

The Reserve Bank of India announced on 20 May that it will withdraw the 2000 rupee note, worth the equivalent of almost 23 euros, from circulation by 30 September. The new largest banknote will then be the 500 rupee note worth about 5.7 euros.

Clearly, this makes the use of cash very unwieldy and forces many traders and buyers to switch to digital money. By using digital money, a bank account becomes a logbook of a bank customer’s life. This helps to monitor and control people by use of computer algorithms. Sanctions can be imposed in the event of unacceptable or simply suspicious behaviour.

In 2016, the central bank, already under the current Modi government, had declared all larger currency notes invalid with only four hours’ notice. They could only be brought to the bank. With this radical measure, the central bank and the government had plunged many millions of people into severe and often existential hardship.

The cash shortage, which lasted for months, was aggravated by the central bank’s simultaneous replacement of the 1000 rupee note by the physically larger 2000 rupee note, which did not fit into the slots of the ATMs.

This 2000 rupee note is now to be abolished without the 1000 rupee note being reintroduced. It is obvious, that this inconsistent reform policy is pure harassment of cash users.

India has been a member of the anti-cash organisation Better Than Cash Alliance since 2014. Its key members, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Mastercard, already had a major influence on India’s anti-cash and anti-people banknote reform in 2016.

Indian-born long-time Mastercard boss Ajay Banga, one of the key warriors and strategists in the global “war on cash” that Mastercard declared in 2005 was elected president of the World Bank in May at the suggestion of the USA.

The European Central Bank stopped printing the 500-euro note in 2016. This was preceded by propaganda pressure from the USA. Those who exerted this pressure, such as the former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, Ken Rogoff, demand that in the long term only the smallest euro notes remain in circulation, as is now being practised in India.

  1. Romar Correa
    June 9, 2023 at 5:18 am

    You credit the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) with a purpose behind the latest demonetisation of the Rs 2000 note which it does not lay claim to, Norbert Häring! True, on occasion one or other government functionary, ranging from an RBI officer to a politician of the ruling party, will throw digitalisation of the rupee into a speech but the expression is no more than hot air. The last occasion in 2016 was a shock, and half-assed reasons were tossed off after the fact. The common factor on both occasions is absence of mind (not to be confused with non-application of mind or absentmindedness). “Inconsistent reform policy” is putting it mildly. Proof of my claim is two propositions voiced by the government this time. The first is that the note will continue to be legal tender. The second is that the note was introduced on a schedule in any case (Your guess is as good as mine). That writ is run.
    The space that should be filled by intellectual capital in the establishment is empty. The Governor of the RBI, Raghuram Rajan, around the first demonetisation was in the dark and revulsed. The current incumbent is a bureaucrat. Since economic arguments are unavailable, political explanations hold sway. The country is predominantly non-formal, and exchanges with murdering and rapist politicians must still be conducted via gunny sacks of cash. The demonetisation of 2016 occurred on the eve of elections in a prominent wild-north state. Demonetisation was intended to be drones targeting the cash godowns of the opposition party, programmed to steer away from own mountains of cash. The claim is weaker this time but national elections are scheduled for 2024.
    If we restrict ourselves to economics, however, and impute the motive you propose to the Indian authorities, Norbert Häring, the implications are serious. As more and more Indians are thrown to the tender mercies of the informal sector, the physical cash nexus can only get stronger. Digitalisation of money, in that case, means the extinguishing of this class. What is explicit is the ferocious commitment of this regime to the financialisation of assets (The word used is monetisation, another illustration of the ignorance of the authorities of monetary economics). Financialisation of real private sector assets is well underway. Finance capital tumbles over itself into the country. The most populous country in the world is divided into two, the wealthy (those whose income is returns on the holdings of financial instruments) and the invisible.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.