A sobering graphic
from David Ruccio
Now, that’s a sobering graphic. The map shows one zip code on Chicago’s South West Side, 60629.
This neighborhood has been gutted. The red dots represent all of the properties in that zip code that are either in pre-foreclosure or are already bank owned.
Now, according to the Washington Post, Chicago has become a foreclosure-free zone.
It wasn’t the banks or judges that instituted the moratorium, because they were still moving cases forward at a rapid clip. The holdup was elsewhere: at the sheriff’s office.
Sheriff Thomas J. Dart, whose office is responsible for physically evicting delinquent homeowners, announced Oct. 19 that his deputies would “no longer be doing the banks’ work for them anymore.”
I wonder what the bottoms-up, free-market types think of this solution to the current housing crisis. . .
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Weekend read - A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- With a modest financial transactions tax, Jim Simons would not have been superrich
- Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- Dystopia and economics
- Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- Reflections on the “Inside Job”
- USA: The Great Prosperity / The Great Regression : 5 charts
- There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- Keynes and the casino
- Comments on RWER issue no. 91
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- CBASILOVECCHIO on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- David Harold Chester on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- pfeffertag on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- CBASILOVECCHIO on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- Arbo on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- spamletblog on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- bckcdb on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- David Harold Chester on Real-world economists take note!
- Patrick Newman on Real-world economists take note!
- deshoebox on Real-world economists take note!
- felipefrs on The non-existence of economic laws
- Seeker on The non-existence of economic laws
- Hepion on Water Flowing Upwards: Net financial flows from developing countries
- yoshinorishiozawa on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- Jan Wiklund on The non-existence of economic laws
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-
Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan
————— Herman Daly —————-
————— Asad Zaman —————
—————– C. T. Kurien —————
————— Robert Locke —————-
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
All power to the Sheriff.
Long live the revolution!
What is the source for the map?
I’ve revised the post to supply the missing link for the map. Here’s the link itself: http://prof77.wordpress.com/the-20/foreclosures-maps/
WP: “Dart asked that attorneys for mortgage companies sign something personally confirming that evictions are justified. None did. So Dart has refused to honor their requests.”
I don’t see how private property fundamentalists could possibly have a problem with this. Sheriff Dart is just asking the would-be foreclosers to demonstrate to his satisfaction that they do, in fact, own the right to foreclose. He is protecting the property rights of the true owners, whoever they are.
Once upon a time, in 1580, there was a revolution. In Friesland, a little statelet somewhere along the North sea coast. The new protestant government seized the lands of the catholoic church – an action which only a few decades before would have been literally unthinkable, evicted rentier monks and started to use the rents to combat the Habsburgs. But guess what – the farmers farming the land did not care and kept on farming, as always. The cows kept grazing, the maids kept on churning the milk and the butter and cheese markets kept functioning. To the surprise of the fundamentalists, the sun did not fall from the sky.
Alas, today the situation is different. Again, there is a revolution. The banks seize masses of houses from the people living in and owning these houses – an action literally unthinkable just three years ago. So, the banks did not only take undue risks, create an administrative and legal mess and receive 700.000.000.000 of tax payers money to finance their mistakes but they also ended up owning the rest of the USA, de facto buying this property for an absolute rock bottom price. And were did all the people go?
How idiotic. If anything, this sheriff is doing the banks a favor. All that property repossessed at once is disastrous for the banks. This way they can blame some sheriff while they carefully cull the value from the rot.
That is a mess of bad loans! I would love to see a breakout on the lenders, the history of the loans, etc. How many of these loans are older than five years, ten?
I can only imagine that no matter what points and fees were paid up front to the lenders, this has proven to be a very bad series of investments.