Score card: 16% vs. 288%
From Edward Fullbrook
David Ruccio‘s post yesterday on the 34-year (and still continuing) period of radical income redistribution in the United States featured a graph from a new report from the Economic Policy Institute. Below, from the same EPI report, is a table no less shocking than yesterday’s graph.
Change in annual wages, by wage group, 1979–2011 (2011 dollars)
|
Average annual wages (2011 dollars) |
Change |
||||||||
|
Wage group |
1979 |
2004 |
2007 |
2011 |
1979– 2004 |
1979– 2011 |
|||
|
Bottom 90% |
$27,110 | $31,344 | $31,626 | $31,050 | 16% | 15% | |||
|
Bottom fifth |
6,569 | 7,471 | – | – | 14 | – | |||
|
Second fifth |
16,369 | 18,192 | – | – | 11 | – | |||
|
Middle fifth |
27,236 | 30,787 | – | – | 13 | – | |||
|
Fourth fifth |
42,173 | 48,234 | – | – | 14 | – | |||
|
Next tenth |
59,293 | 72,724 | – | – | 23 | – | |||
|
90th to 99th percentile |
$88,670 | $123,588 | $128,857 | $130,473 | 39% | 47% | |||
|
90–95 |
75,191 | 98,319 | 100,801 | 102,429 | 31 | 36 | |||
|
95–99 |
105,519 | 155,175 | 163,927 | 165,527 | 47 | 57 | |||
|
Top 1.0% |
$255,760 | $580,976 | $655,171 | $598,570 | 127% | 134% | |||
|
99.0–99.5 |
179,591 | 299,742 | – | – | 67 | – | |||
|
99.5–99.9 |
272,532 | 525,903 | – | – | 93 | – | |||
|
99.9–100 (Top 0.1%) |
569,521 | 2,207,437 | 2,633,800 | 2,158,892 | 288 | 279 | |||
Source: Authors’ analysis of Kopczuk, Saez, and Song (2010) and Social Security Administration wage statistics
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Real World Economics Review
Real World Economics Review
WEA – May 2011 – 11,500+ members
5800 people follow this blog on Twitter
Recent Comments
- davetaylor1 on A letter from the president of Cyprus, about the bail-in of his country
- Herb Wiseman on A letter from the president of Cyprus, about the bail-in of his country
- Fred Zaman on Adam Smith, F. Zaman’s RWER paper and the 99% Movement
- cesar on Meme-bashing of the day: Spanish exports are not increasing
- Mark Friedman on A letter from the president of Cyprus, about the bail-in of his country
- davetaylor1 on The Neoclassical conspiracy against Post Keynesian Economics (1)
- merijnknibbe on Did high unemployment enable the Nazi’s to increase their share of the votes? Yes. Unequivocally: yes.
- davetaylor1 on Did high unemployment enable the Nazi’s to increase their share of the votes? Yes. Unequivocally: yes.
- Robert Locke on The Neoclassical conspiracy against Post Keynesian Economics (1)
- davetaylor1 on The Neoclassical conspiracy against Post Keynesian Economics (1)
- sergio on Finding a framework for a New Economics
- Robert Locke on Did high unemployment enable the Nazi’s to increase their share of the votes? Yes. Unequivocally: yes.
- Robert Locke on The Neoclassical conspiracy against Post Keynesian Economics (1)
- BFWR on The Neoclassical conspiracy against Post Keynesian Economics (1)
- davetaylor1 on The Neoclassical conspiracy against Post Keynesian Economics (1)
Top Posts and Pages- last 48 hours
- Did high unemployment enable the Nazi's to increase their share of the votes? Yes. Unequivocally: yes.
- Meme-evaporating of the day: the Nazis could rise to power because of high unemployment, not because of high inflation
- The Spanish economy is suffering from contagion
- A letter from the president of Cyprus, about the bail-in of his country
- The Neoclassical conspiracy against Post Keynesian Economics (1)
- IS-LM is bad economics no matter what Krugman says
- Meme-bashing of the day: Spanish exports are not increasing
- Adam Smith, F. Zaman’s RWER paper and the 99% Movement
- Economics is a science?!
- The Real Dow
Revere Award in Economics
Dynamite Prize for Economics
Blog Authors
- anmayhew
- Lewis L. Smith
- bruceedmonds
- Kevin P. Gallagher
- deanbaker1
- Steve Keen
- Deniz Kellecioglu
- David F. Ruccio
- donaldgillies
- Peter Dorman
- Editor
- frankackerman
- frankrotering
- Edward Fullbrook
- iettogg
- jamieamorgan
- Jim Stanford
- julieanelson
- Mark Weisbrot
- merijnknibbe
- paul davidson
- Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra
- Peter Earl
- pesod
- peterradford
- paul ormerod
- Peter Earl
- staveren
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
RWER Contributors
Editor: Edward Fullbrook. Associate Editor: Jamie Morgan. PAST CONTRIBUTORS: James Galbraith, Frank Ackerman, André Orléan, Hugh Stretton, Jacques Sapir, Edward Fullbrook, Gilles Raveaud, Deirdre McCloskey, Tony Lawson, Geoff Harcourt, Joseph Halevi, Sheila C. Dow, Kurt Jacobsen, The Cambridge 27, Paul Ormerod, Steve Keen, Grazia Ietto-Gillies, Emmanuelle Benicourt, Le Movement Autisme-Economie, Geoffrey Hodgson, Ben Fine, Michael A. Bernstein, Julie A. Nelson, Jeff Gates, Anne Mayhew, Bruce Edmonds, Jason Potts, John Nightingale, Alan Shipman, Peter E. Earl, Marc Lavoie, Jean Gadrey, Peter Söderbaum, Bernard Guerrien, Susan Feiner, Warren J. Samuels, Katalin Martinás, George M. Frankfurter, Elton G. McGoun, Yanis Varoufakis, Alex Millmow, Bruce J. Caldwell, Poul Thøis Madsen, Helge Peukert, Dietmar Lindenberger, Reiner Kümmel, Jane King, Peter Dorman, K.M.P. Williams, Frank Rotering, Ha-Joon Chang, Claude Mouchot, Robert E. Lane, James G. Devine, Richard Wolff, Jamie Morgan, Robert Heilbroner, William Milberg, Stephen T. Ziliak, Steve Fleetwood, Tony Aspromourgos, Yves Gingras, Ingrid Robeyns, Robert Scott Gassler, Grischa Periono, Esther-Mirjam Sent, Ana Maria Bianchi, Steve Cohn, Peter Wynarczyk, Daniel Gay, Asatar Bair, Nathaniel Chamberland, James Bondio, Jared Ferrie, Goutam U. Jois, Charles K. Wilber, Robert Costanza, Saski Sivramkrishna, Jorge Buzaglo, Jim Stanford, Matthew McCartney, Herman E. Daly, Kyle Siler, Kepa M. Ormazabal, Antonio Garrido, Robert Locke, J. E. King, Paul Davidson, Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra, Kevin Quinn, Trond Andresen, Shaun Hargreaves Heap, Lewis L. Smith, Gautam Mukerjee, Ian Fletcher, Rajni Bakshi, M. Ben-Yami, Deborah Campbell, Irene van Staveren, Neva Goodwin, Thomas Weisskopf, Mehrdad Vahabi, Erik S. Reinert, Jeroen Van Bouwel, Bruce R. McFarling, Pia Malaney, Andrew Spielman, Jeffery Sachs, Julian Edney, Frederic S. Lee, Paul Downward, Andrew Mearman, Dean Baker, Tom Green, David Ellerman, Wolfgang Drechsler, Clay Shirky, Bjørn-Ivar Davidsen, Robert F. Garnett, Jr., François Eymard-Duvernay, Olivier Favereau, Robert Salais, Laurent Thévenot, Mohamed Aslam Haneef, Kurt Rothschild, Jomo K. S., Gustavo Marqués, David F. Ruccio, John Barry, William Kaye-Blake; Michael Ash, Donald Gillies, Kevin P.Gallagher, Lyuba Zarsky, Michel Bauwens, Bruce Cumings, Concetta Balestra, Frank Fagan, Christian Arnsperger, Stanley Alcorn, Ben Solarz, Sanford Jacoby, Kari Polanyi, P. Sainath, Margaret Legum, Juan Carlos Moreno-Brid, Igor Pauno, Ron Morrison, John Schmitt, Ben Zipperer, John B. Davis, Alan Freeman, Andrew Kliman, Philip Ball, Alan Goodacre, Robert McMaster, David A. Bainbridge, Richard Parker, Tim Costello, Brendan Smith, Jeremy Brecher, Peter T. Manicas, Arjo Klamer, Donald MacKenzie, Max Wright, Joseph E. Stiglitz. George Irvin, Frédéric Lordon, James Angresano, Robert Pollin, Heidi Garrett-Peltier, Dani Rodrik, Marcellus Andrews, Riccardo Baldissone, Ted Trainer, Kenneth J. Arrow, Brian Snowdon, Helen Johns, Fanny Coulomb, J. Paul Dunne, Jayati Ghosh, L. A Duhs, Paul Shaffer, Donald W Braben, Roland Fox, Marco Gillies, Joshua C. Hall, Robert A. Lawson, Will Luther, JP Bouchaud, Claude Hillinger, George Soros, David George, Alan Wolfe, Thomas I. Palley, Sean Mallin, Clive Dilnot, Dan Turton, Korkut Ertürk, Gökcer Özgür, Geoff Tily, Jonathan M. Harris, Thomas I. Palley, Jan Kregel, Peter Gowan, David Colander, Hans Foellmer, Armin Haas, Alan Kirman, Katarina Juselius, Brigitte Sloth, Thomas Lux, Luigi Sapaventa, Gunnar Tómasson, Anatole Kaletsky, Robert R Locke, Bill Lucarelli, L. Randall Wray, Mark Weisbrot, Walden Bello, Marvin Brown, Deniz Kellecioglu, Esteban Pérez Caldentey, Matías Vernengo, Thodoris Koutsobinas, David A. Westbrook, Peter Radford, Paul A. David, Richard Smith, Russell Standish, Yeva Nersisyan, Elizabeth Stanton, Jonathan Kirshner, Thomas Wells, Bruce Elmslie, Steve Marglin, Adam Kessler, John Duffield, Mary Mellor, Merijn Knibbe, Michael Hudson, Lars Pålsson Syll, Korkut Erturk, Jane D’Arista, Richard Smith, Ali Kadri, Egmont Kakarot-Handtke, Ozgur Gun, George DeMartino, Robert H. Wade, Silla Sigurgeirsdottir, Victor A. Beker, Pavlina R. Tcherneva, Ali Kadri, Egmont Kakarot-Handtke, Ozgur Gun, George DeMartino, Robert H. Wade, Silla Sigurgeirsdottir, Victor A. Beker, Pavlina R. Tcherneva
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
Family Links
- David Ruccio’s Blog
- Dean Baker Op-Eds and Columns
- Global Development and Environmental Institute
- Mark Weisbrot Op-Eds and Columns
- No Apparent Motive
- Real Climate Economics
- real-world economics review
- Richard Wolff
- Steve Keen’s Debtwatch
- The Progressive Economics Forum
- The Radford Free Press
- Triple Crisis
- Walking Against Australia's Property Mania
Contact
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
Are there similar tables / statistics for other ‘developed’ countries?
This should not be a surprise to anyone with a basic economics education. At the heart of our system of property and tax laws is a fundamental redistribution of wealth from producers to non-producers. This is in the form of the claims on production by landed interests as recipients of rents (imputed and as charges to lessees). Economics and economists as a group have largely ignored the moral question of whether societally-created rents need to be publicly collected as the logical source of revenue to pay for necessary public goods and services. The privatization of rents (which is unearned income to individuals and entities) has meant the taxation of legitimately earned income flows, capital goods and other assets as well as commerce, imposing heavy debt weight losses on the economy.
Silly Ed, even Real-World economists don’t get land.
This chart being about “wages”, are enrichment via profits, interest and property rents even taken into account? On rents, curious how rents in all these forms continue to go up even as the number of people who can afford to pay them goes down: surely an example of market failure which government ought to be correcting, regulating and making good by developing a more reasonable method of distributing income (hopefully one less “privatised” than some people paying others wages).
The one effective solution is societal collection of rents via taxation. Regulation affects the rental value a potential user of land will pay to control some aspect of nature. For example, banning clear-cutting by timber companies imposes higher costs of timber extraction, which would lower the ground rent the company would bid for access to land. The community would yield less rent via taxation but would also have much lower costs of environmental remediation. As a probable positive side-effect, the rental value of adjacent lands with a different highest, best use (e.g., residential) would increase because the surrounding forests would remain intact, greatly reducing the potential for destruction due to soil runoff during heavy rains, etc.
And some people claim America doesn’t have an inequality problem . . . .
Important to remember the role of feminism in any wage growth from the 70′s onwards. Mens wages have been basically stagnant in that period, so any (even modest) increase in the wages of ordinary people is probably a rise in women’s wages, which have increased as a result of political conflict not market forces.
From a working class man’s point of view the situation is even starker than the table indicates.
The struggle by women for equal treatment in the workforce continues, but women have acquired the education and training to be compete for all manner of jobs. The entry of women into the workforce is not a cause of stagnant wages for men. The cause is a failed economic system to provide sufficient employment opportunities for everyone who needs to and desires to offer their labor. Unfortunately, neither our policymakers nor very many economists have grasped the fundamental reason being the concentrated ownership and control over land and natural resource values that enables these interests to enjoy monopoly returns as rent-seekers.
Hi Edward,
I think you may have mis-read me. I wasn’t arguing that women entering the workforce lowered men’s wages. Simply that feminism had raised women’s wages. My point was to emphasize the importance of popular struggle in raising wages. I’ve argued it in a little more detail in this vlog here called “unions and feminism are good for the economy”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptiEyWxzEhM
Regarding your comments on our failed and highly unequal economic system, I agree entirely.
Peace.