For the bottom 60 percent of households in the US, wealth declined from 1983 to 2010 (chart).
from David Ruccio
The chart, from the twelfth edition of the State of Working America, highlights the increase in wealth inequality grom 1983 to 2010 by showing how different groups in the wealth distribution accumulated which portion of the increase in household wealth during that period.
Nearly 40 percent (38.3 percent) of the increase in average household wealth during that period accrued to the top 1 percent, and nearly three-fourths (74.2 percent) accrued to the top 5 percent of the distribution. For the bottom 60 percent of households, wealth declined from 1983 to 2010.
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Weekend read - A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- With a modest financial transactions tax, Jim Simons would not have been superrich
- Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- Dystopia and economics
- Comments on RWER issue no. 91
- Reflections on the “Inside Job”
- There ain’t no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all the money to the rich
- Comments on RWER issue no. 89
- USA: The Great Prosperity / The Great Regression : 5 charts
- Keynes and the casino
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- sackergeoff on With a modest financial transactions tax, Jim Simons would not have been superrich
- CBASILOVECCHIO on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- David Harold Chester on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- pfeffertag on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- CBASILOVECCHIO on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- Arbo on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- spamletblog on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- bckcdb on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- David Harold Chester on Real-world economists take note!
- Patrick Newman on Real-world economists take note!
- deshoebox on Real-world economists take note!
- felipefrs on The non-existence of economic laws
- Seeker on The non-existence of economic laws
- Hepion on Water Flowing Upwards: Net financial flows from developing countries
- yoshinorishiozawa on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-
Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan
————— Herman Daly —————-
————— Asad Zaman —————
—————– C. T. Kurien —————
————— Robert Locke —————-
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
Please note that the top 1-10% of US households own 85% of all US financial wealth, the top 20% own 93%, and the bottom 80% hold 7% of financial wealth.
The overwhelming share of “wealth” presumably owned by the bottom 80% is/was in the form of residential unreal estate equity, which is actually, in fact, the equity of the lien holder(s), not the mortgage debtor. The debtor must borrow “his money” at compounding interest from the lender to realize purchasing power of “his money”.
Now that the unreal estate bubble has burst and federal gov’t has become the lien holder of mortgage debt of last resort, a majority of US mortgage (land price) debtors are akin to modern-day peasants “bound to land” by their own gov’t with a claim of 3-4 times the mortgage debtor’s labor income in perpetuity.
The US (and English-speaking world) is due radical land and labor (tax code) reform to overthrow the private rentier oligarchic landlordism enabled and enforced by the imperial corporate-state.
It appears that Madame Guillotine needs another outing.