The 15 largest arms exporters per capita
from Jorge Buzaglo
https://rwer.wordpress.com/2016/01/01/world-arms-industry-statistics-by-country-4-tables-and-charts/
It is interesting to see how the picture changes completely when we measure arms exports per capita for the 15 largest expporters (for the same year (2014), in million (1990) dollars): 1. Israel 96.9
2. Switzerland 42.2
3. Russia 40.9
4. Sweden 40.2
5. Netherlands 33.0
6. USA 31.7
7. France 29.7
8. United Kingdom 26.0
9. Spain 23.9
10. Ukraine 15.5
11. Germany 14.8
12. Italy 12.9
13. Canada 6.5
14. Turkey 3.5
15. China 0.8
Data from SIPRI and Wikipedia
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- The non-existence of economic laws
- Proper use of math in economics
- Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- USA: The Great Prosperity / The Great Regression : 5 charts
- The Great Transformation: poverty on a large scale
- Chicago economics — nothing but pseudo-scientific cheating
- What are axiomatizations good for?
- The difference between logic and science
- Comments on rwer issue no 93
- Ayn Rand — a perverted psychopath
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- energyasnumeraire on The non-existence of economic laws
- yoshinorishiozawa on The non-existence of economic laws
- Guy Dauncey on The non-existence of economic laws
- John Otto de Villiers on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- yoshinorishiozawa on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- energyasnumeraire on In search of radical alternatives
- CBASILOVECCHIO on Wealth catapulted up
- ghholtham on Basics of Monetary Economies
- ghholtham on Weekend read – Enlightenment epistemology and the climate crisis
- ghholtham on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- Jan Milch on The eclipse part wo
- geoffdavies1944 on The eclipse part wo
- Roger C on The eclipse part wo
- David Harold Chester on Chang’s “Edible Economics”
- David Harold Chester on Chicago economics — nothing but pseudo-scientific cheating
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-
Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan
————— Herman Daly —————-
————— Asad Zaman —————
—————– C. T. Kurien —————
————— Robert Locke —————-
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
There seems to be something very odd going on here. The population of the USA is 320 million plus, while the population of Russia is 145 million plus. In other words, the USA has more than twice the population of Russia. Now the raw figures for arms exports show that the USA exports more than 3.5 times the value of arms that Russia does. A factor of slightly over two cannot possibly cancel out a factor of 3.5. So, even per capita, it’s obvious that the USA still exports more arms by value than Russia.
Not having the raw figures for the smaller nations such as Israel, this is what my spreadsheet tells me (population in millions):
Value Pop Per capita
Sweden 5500 10 550
USA 36223 323 112
Russia 10200 142 72
France 4400 65 68
Netherlands 900 17 53
Spain 1200 47 26
Italy 1300 61 21
South Korea 1000 50 20
Ukraine 800 45 18
Germany 900 83 11
China 2200 1394 2
http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/
It should be noted that Russia, Ukraine, and China probably charge far less for a given capability. A Russian or Chinese tank or jet plane costs much less than a Western one of similar capability. On the other hand, Russia and China need to spend more on defence than they would wish to, because they are faced with massive threats from the USA and its NATO allies.
Sorry about the lack of formatting! But I hope it is clear what my “table” is trying to say. At least there is one space between each two fields.
Oh, and contrary to the article’s assertion, the final column value per capita of arms exports) is not in millions of dollars but in dollars. Thus Sweden exports $550 worth of arms per citizen, and so on.
Economics is politics. War is politics with other means. War is the business of empire. War is good business for imperialists.
Therefore, economics is politics is the intellectual, amoral, sophistic rationalization for large-scale, state-sponsored- and -enforced utilization of violence to expand empire for the purpose of resource expropriation, exploitation of cheap/slave labor, and tolerance/encouragement of genocide and ecocide in the process for fun and profit.
Imagine there’s no war.
Imagine ancient spice trails now turned to high speed rails,
pipeline and utility corridors for the great inner continent.
Beijing to Moscow and on down to legendary Terhan.
We’ll be rock’n and a roll’n ’till the break of dawn.
Then the US pirouettes to the pacific,
Chines chess masters build a base near the Filipines.
Ever body’s rock’n an roll’n in their ol’ blue jeans.
China, Russia and Iran sign together in solidarity.
Now your talking ’bout a we. The one’s with old spice trails
that’r leading t’ward Greece and Italy.
Genghis Kahn with tactical nukes.
Rock’n in the US
Rock’n in the US
Rock’n in the USSR
Growth of global real GDP per capita and trade is done with capital, credit, and trade flows and GDP PPP having reached parity between the three major geographical trading blocs. That is to say, like the British Empire’s “globalization” before it, the Anglo-American militarist-imperial trade regime’s global expansion is over.
But unlike the similar period during the late 19th century, there are more than 5 billion more human apes in deep population overshoot (see William Catton’s works, RIP) on a finite planet, with 7+ billion human apes and counting facing Peak Oil, resource depletion per capita, “Limits to Growth”, climate change, unprecedented indebtedness per capita and as a share of wages and GDP, and Gilded Age-like inequality.
A toxic brew if there ever were one, compadres.
Tom Walsh is right; the numbers are all screwed up. How can the UK come 7th in per capita arms exports yet not feature in the top 11 in absolute value? That would imply the UK has a small population. At some 65 million it is bigger than Ukraine, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, France or Sweden.
Russia and China only “need” to spend so much on armaments if they are respectively trying to restore the Russian empire and annex the South China Sea. No-one is trying to invade them – not even the USA. Mind you no-one is trying to invade the USA either so it certainly doesn’t need to spend so much on military kit. If countries weren’t so anxious to “defend” themselves other countries would have less “defence” to worry about.