Home > Uncategorized > Crime, starvation and incarceration in America (2 charts)

Crime, starvation and incarceration in America (2 charts)

Subject to an unregulated free market for labor, Polanyi believed that “workers would die as the victims of acute social dislocation through vice, perversion, crime, and starvation”. The US has the most “flexible” labor market of all OECD countries, meaning the freest market for labor, with the least intervention by government or social institutions, as defined by Polanyi. “Essentially, to get high ratings, a country must have low marginal tax rates, a low minimum wage, a high degree of flexibility in hiring and firing, a small amount of centralized collective bargaining, and low unemployment benefits” (Lawson, Robert A. & Bierhanzl, 2004 p. 122). Advocates of laissez-faire “free market” policies believe that the threat of starvation will motivate people to seek employment. The number of people on food assistance reached an all-time high after the 2008 financial crisis, and currently in the U.S. around one of six people in the country (14% as of Jan 13, 2015, US Dept. Ag[1]), and one in five of children (US Census Bureau, Jan. 28, 2015)[2] are on the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps. Polanyi’s claim that without mitigating social institutions, an unregulated free market in labor would result in starvation is proven to be true. Without SNAP these people would starve. 

flomenhoft-2

 Increase in incarceration with neo-liberal era

flomenhoft-3

The United States has 5% of the world population and 25% of the prison inmates. The incarceration rate is more than double all other OECD countries. It is noteworthy that the era of neo-liberal supremacy began with the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, and accelerated with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Policies in the US became more consistent with unregulated markets than ever before, in accord with Margaret Thatcher’s claim that “There is No Alternative” (TINA), to the “Washington Consensus” of privatization, liberalization, free trade, free movement of capital, structural adjustment, and all the other policies promoted by market fundamentalists since 1980. There was an inflection point in 1980 when US incarceration rates began to increase drastically (figure 16). Before that time the US was in line with other OECD countries. This increased incarceration was not a result of an increase in violent crime as the violent crime rate dropped during this same period. Although it cannot be directly blamed on flexible labor markets, this increase in incarceration rate is consistent with Polanyi’s claim that treating labor as a market commodity will result in “crime and starvation”.

Gary Flomenhoft
Escaping the Polanyi matrix: the impact of fictitious commodities: money, land, and labor on consumer welfare 

  1. patrick newman
    November 7, 2016 at 9:03 am

    The UK has its own story to tell of incarceration although not on the scale of the USA but in relation to other European countries is an outlier (prison population 95,000+ – only Russia and Turkey lock up more people). Matters are not helped by the reduction in prison officers fron 27,000 in 2011 to the current complement of 18,000 mostly through privatisation and austerity cuts. The very recent Bedford jail riot is a harbinger of things to come and the Justice Secretary has instituted a panic recruitment of 2000 additional officrers having realised it costs more (she quotes £15bn a year) to deal with re-offending than to provide the resources to be more effective in rehabilitation. I dont have the figures but I suspect there is a similar correlation with social and economic factors in the UK to that of the shocking position in the USA.

  2. November 10, 2016 at 6:55 pm

    This stark presentation brings home facts which are absolutely shocking.

    I find even more shocking the lack of comments here: folk seem dumbfounded rather than angry about it, which is perhaps why nothing gets done. Thanks for drawing attention to our shameful British situation, Patrick: your comparisons help.

  3. November 11, 2016 at 4:46 am

    This is very much in line with chronology in many other posts, including mine: The Power of Economic Theory. I wonder about the extent to which privatization of prisons has contributed to this. Also, what are the other drivers of this dramatic increase — that is, is it that laws have been changed to be more severe, more mandatory prison sentences, zero-tolerance laws, scope of “crimes” enlarged, or what? Probably a combination of several factors, but a breakdown would be interesting.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s