Herman Daly has passed away
Herman Daly (1938-2022) was an early supporter of and a frequent contributor to the Real-World Economics Review, and the week before last, eleven days before he died age 84, he submitted an essay to RWER with this email.
Dear Edward,
I hope that you are well and surviving still in our disintegrating world. RWER continues as a voice of sanity. I am still kicking, but slowly, which has its benefits.
Attached is an article that I am submitting to RWER. Suggestions welcome.
All good wishes,
Herman
Herman’s essay “Ecological economics in four parables” will appear in RWER‘s next issue, early December.
https://www.worldeconomicsassociation.org/library/essays-against-growthism/
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- The problem with electric vehicles
- With a modest financial transactions tax, Jim Simons would not have been superrich
- Weekend read - A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- CO2 since the start of the Industrial Revolution
- Comments on RWER issue no. 89
- Utopia and mathematics
- Commnts on issue 87
- USA: The Great Prosperity / The Great Regression : 5 charts
- Ayn Rand — a perverted psychopath
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- David Harold Chester on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- sackergeoff on With a modest financial transactions tax, Jim Simons would not have been superrich
- CBASILOVECCHIO on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- David Harold Chester on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- pfeffertag on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- CBASILOVECCHIO on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- Arbo on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- spamletblog on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- bckcdb on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- David Harold Chester on Real-world economists take note!
- Patrick Newman on Real-world economists take note!
- deshoebox on Real-world economists take note!
- felipefrs on The non-existence of economic laws
- Seeker on The non-existence of economic laws
- Hepion on Water Flowing Upwards: Net financial flows from developing countries
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-
Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan
————— Herman Daly —————-
————— Asad Zaman —————
—————– C. T. Kurien —————
————— Robert Locke —————-
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
I was trained as an economist at Berkeley in the 1960s. Some of us tried to petition the department to address ecological and environmental issues, to no avail. The most environmentally oriented author presented was Kenneth Boulding, still a favorite of mine, and one of those who influenced Daly. I became disgusted with the economics profession and left to pursue a career in another field. Herman Daly’s Steady-State Economics (1977) brought me back into an interest in the subject of economics. A good man is gone.
Thank you, Edward, for reminding me of a book in my Kindle I need to read. It is a wise soul who is able to coordinate science, philosophy, and religion, who considers facts, meanings, and values as all worthy of human reflection. Unfortunately, neoliberal economics has reduced “value” to solely pecuniary meaning, which impoverishes our ability to understand the role of economics in society and our individual lives.