Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- The problem with electric vehicles
- Lost opportunities?
- Weekend read - A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- With a modest financial transactions tax, Jim Simons would not have been superrich
- Dystopia and economics
- Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- Reflections on the “Inside Job”
- Water Flowing Upwards: Net financial flows from developing countries
- Piketty’s response to Mankiw et al.: "and some consume academics.”
- Distribution and redistribution of wealth in USA
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- David Harold Chester on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- David Harold Chester on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- sackergeoff on With a modest financial transactions tax, Jim Simons would not have been superrich
- CBASILOVECCHIO on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- David Harold Chester on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- pfeffertag on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- CBASILOVECCHIO on Weekend read – A STIGLITZ ERROR?
- Arbo on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- spamletblog on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- bckcdb on Economics — a dismal and harmful science
- David Harold Chester on Real-world economists take note!
- Patrick Newman on Real-world economists take note!
- deshoebox on Real-world economists take note!
- felipefrs on The non-existence of economic laws
- Seeker on The non-existence of economic laws
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-
Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan
————— Herman Daly —————-
————— Asad Zaman —————
—————– C. T. Kurien —————
————— Robert Locke —————-
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
26 March 2016
Dear Lars Syll:
RE: “Why Game Theory Never Will Be Anything but a Footnote…” RWER Issue No. 83, March 26, 2018
For an alternate more optimistic viewpoint based on a broader (much less restrictive) conception of “game theory,” please see the recently published JEM paper cited below with abstract and preprint/talk links.
Comments welcome.
Best wishes,
Leigh Tesfatsion
ISU Research Professor
Leigh Tesfatsion, “Modeling Economic Systems as Locally-Constructive Sequential Games,” Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 24, Issue 4, 2017, 384-409.
Click to access EconSystemsAsLocallyConstructiveSequentialGames.LTesfatsionWP.pdf
Click to access EconSystemsAsLCSGames.TalkSlides.LTesfatsion.pdf
Abstract: Real-world economies are open-ended dynamic systems consisting of heterogeneous interacting participants. Human participants are decision-makers who strategically take into account the past actions and potential future actions of other participants. All participants are forced to be locally constructive, meaning their actions at any given time must be based on their local states; and participant actions at any given time affect future local states. Taken together, these essential properties imply real-world economies are locally-constructive sequential games. This paper discusses a modeling approach, Agent-based Computational Economics (ACE), that permits researchers to study economic systems from this point of view. ACE modeling principles and objectives are first concisely presented and explained. The remainder of the paper then highlights challenging issues and edgier explorations that ACE researchers are currently pursuing.
Eli Cook’s paper, “The great marginalization: why twentieth century economists neglected inequality” is a thoughtful analysis of the manner in which an agenda-driven economics, posing to be “value free”, has acted to serve the interests of rent-seekers, monopolists and free riders – particularly during the last quarter of the 20th century.
We must trust the new century will put an end to the ills of an economics which, whilst teaching that entrepreneurial skill and hard work offer potential success to all, it has directed the net income to a favoured few at vast cost to all others. As inequality worsens, it’s beyond time to revisit the idea of David Ricardo, Adam Smith, JS Mill and Henry George that, for markets to work both efficiently and fairly, economic rents–not wages and profits–need to be taxed away.