Home > economic journals, economics profession > Fred Lee’s departing words of wisdom

Fred Lee’s departing words of wisdom

Fred Lee, the much-loved founder of the Heterodox Economics Newsletter, is stepping down as its editor. In his final editor’s message he offers non-neoclassical economists the following advice.

First, heterodox economists need to cite heterodox journals (whether in the SSCI or not) more extensively in their journal articles. In fact, as a whole, in their articles heterodox economists cite mainstream journals more often than heterodox journals (and mainstream journals simply do not cite heterodox journals), which give the mainstream journals a higher ranking relative to heterodox journals. Thus, perhaps a reduction in the citation of mainstream journals would in the long term have a positive impact on the rankings heterodox journals. Second, heterodox economists should become more involved in the literature of the ranking of journals and departments and in the research assessment literature. Constructing alternative rankings and critically evaluating national and local research assessment activities is one step in the right direct. A second step would be to query your favorite heterodox association and/or heterodox journal editor why they are so reluctant to deal with or publish articles on these topics. A third point is that heterodox economists need to be more active in challenging the dominance and anti-intellectual behavior of mainstream economics and economists. Not being respectable, standing up and just saying NO, pursuing heterodox research, and working with and through groups that are not part of the social-political-economic elite to promote better social-economics policies that benefit the non-elite are just some of the things heterodox economists can do. Of course, such behavior is frown upon, discouraged by the critics of heterodox economics—they would rather you be docile, embrace conformity, and behave as mainstream economist do. All I can do is to urge you to not crave respectability, but to develop a content-based heterodox economic theory and associated economic policy that contributes to building a better world out of the shell of the old.

Fred Lee

  1. May 18, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    I believe I should mind my manners.

  2. October 26, 2014 at 10:09 am

    Fred Lee emphasizes certain personal qualities needed by those who would be successful heterodox economists. Maria Alejandra Madi and Jack Reardon are editing a volume of articles on “Challenging the Current Economics Curriculum” based on the recent WEA online conference on the topic. The paper I contributed to this volume is entitled “Creating Challengers and Change –” which focuses on personal characteristics that those who would challenge the orthodoxy need to cultivate. This paper is available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2469546. The opening paragraphs describe the personality considered admirable by neoclassicals, and the remaining paper focuses on the necessity of cultivating the opposite characteristics in order to be a living embodiment of errors of neoclassical thinking. The first two paragraphs of the paper are reproduced below:

    How does it happen that we have given our quiet assent to a situation where the richest 85 individuals have more money than the bottom 3.5 billion? Where vultures wait for starving children to die, while others eat luxurious meals on private resort islands? Where horrendous military and commercial crimes leading to deaths, misery, and deprivations of millions are routinely committed by highly educated men with multimillion dollar salaries in luxury corporate and government suites?

    A core component of the answer to these critical questions is that we have been educated to believe that this is a normal state of affairs, which comes about through the operation of iron laws of economics. Economic theories currently being taught in universities all over the world are an essential pillar which sustains the economic system currently in operation. These theories state that we (human beings) are cold, callous, and calculating. Microeconomic theory says rational individuals are concerned only with their own consumption. They are callous; completely indifferent to the needs of others. They maximize, calculating personal benefits to the last penny. They are cold – their decisions are not swayed by emotions of any kind. All this theorizing is not without power – it creates the world we live in, and the rules we live by.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.