Map of the day : the world’s billionairs
from David Ruccio
This map of the world’s billionaires—all 2,325 of them (an all-time record high), with a total wealth of $7.3 trillion (which is higher than the market capitalization of all the companies that make up the Dow Jones Industrial Average)—comes from the new census by Wealth-X and UBS
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Real-World Economics Review
WEA Books
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- The non-existence of economic laws
- Proper use of math in economics
- USA: The Great Prosperity / The Great Regression : 5 charts
- Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- The Great Transformation: poverty on a large scale
- In search of radical alternatives
- Weekend read - Blood and Oil in the Orient: A 2023 Update
- RWER issue 56: Egmont Kakarot Handtke
- Macro-economic policy and votes in the thirties: Germany (and The Netherlands) during the Great Depression
- Problems with Pareto optimality
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein
Regular Contributors
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
WEA online conference: Trade Wars after Coronavirus
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- energyasnumeraire on The non-existence of economic laws
- yoshinorishiozawa on The non-existence of economic laws
- Guy Dauncey on The non-existence of economic laws
- John Otto de Villiers on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- yoshinorishiozawa on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- energyasnumeraire on In search of radical alternatives
- CBASILOVECCHIO on Wealth catapulted up
- ghholtham on Basics of Monetary Economies
- ghholtham on Weekend read – Enlightenment epistemology and the climate crisis
- ghholtham on Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
- Jan Milch on The eclipse part wo
- geoffdavies1944 on The eclipse part wo
- Roger C on The eclipse part wo
- David Harold Chester on Chang’s “Edible Economics”
- David Harold Chester on Chicago economics — nothing but pseudo-scientific cheating
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- More WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-
Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan
————— Herman Daly —————-
————— Asad Zaman —————
—————– C. T. Kurien —————
————— Robert Locke —————-
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
Family Links
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
meanwhile, according to World Bank insider Lant Pritchett, 88% of humanity exists in poverty:
http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/1040.php#continue
and then there’s this to consider, too:
http://www.michaelparenti.org/Superrich.html
from that very short article:
The super rich, the less than 1 percent of the population who own the lion’s share of the nation’s wealth, go uncounted in most income distribution reports.
All such reports about income distribution are based on U.S. Census Bureau surveys that regularly leave Big Money out of the picture. A few phone calls to the Census Bureau in Washington D.C. revealed that for years the bureau never interviewed anyone who had an income higher than $300,000. Or if interviewed, they were never recorded as above the “reportable upper limit” of $300,000, the top figure allowed by the bureau’s computer program.
Media publicity that focuses exclusively on a handful of greedy top executives conveniently avoids any exposure of the super rich as a class.
Indeed, most of the really big money is inherited — and by a portion of the population that is so minuscule as to be judged statistically inaccessible.
That top 0.25 owns more wealth than the other 99 percent combined.
For years now, as the wealth of the few has been growing, the number of poor has been increasing at a faster rate than the earth’s population.
(The rest is at the link of course)
We humans could invest in Fairpay Justice and reap the biggest-ever dividends for all of humanity. Fairpay Justice waits in the wings, ever-prepared to bestow great economic, social, and psychological riches upon our entire species. But alas it seems we utterly lack the self-respect required to demand equal pay for equal sacrifice to working.